Advanced Search Results
Manmohan Vs. Gangabai and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Dec-10-1993
Motor Vehicles
1994ACJ1213
B.L. Agarwal, Adv.
A.R. Tiwari, J.1. This revision petition, presented under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, (for short 'the Code') is directed against the order dated 14.5.1993 rendered by the Labour Court, thereby declining the prayer...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State of Rajasthan Vs. Nawal Kishore and ors.
Rajasthan
Dec-14-1982
Civil
1982WLN(UC)464
Kanta Bhatnagar, J.1. The respondents were tried for the offence under Section 6 of the Indian Boilers Act, 1923 (hereinafter to be referred as 'the Act') by the Munsif and Judicial Magistrate, Chittorgarh. By the judgment...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA.P. Singh (Dr.) Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Allahabad
Jan-05-2001
Service
(2001)1UPLBEC638
Rakesh Bahadur, Adv.
S.R. Singh and D.R. Chaudhary, JJ.1. The petitioner, a teacher in K. K. Post Graduate College, Etawah (hereinafter referred to as the College) has filed this writ petition for issuance of a direction to the respondents...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Balbeer Kumar JaIn and anr. Vs. Tripti Kumar Kothari
Rajasthan
Oct-22-2003
Tenancy
Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001 - Sections 6, 32 and 32(3); Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950 - Sections 6 and 7
RLW2004(2)Raj819; 2003(4)WLC790
R.K. Agarwal and; J.S. Rastogi, Advs.
Goyal, J.1. Following common question of law arises in these four appeals:-'Whether the proceedings for fixation of standard rent under the repealed Act pending on the date of commencement of the Rajasthan Rent control Act, 2001,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSantosh Kumar Agarwal Vs. Oriental Bank of Commerce and ors.
Kolkata
Jan-18-2001
Banking
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Section 21
[2001]105CompCas976(Cal)
Ajoy Kumar Chatterjee, Adv.
Amitava Lala, J.1. This is a suit for : (a) a decree for a declaration that the lien purported to be created and orally claimed by the defendant-bank on the fixed deposits mentioned in the schedule...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGem Motors Vs. Income Tax Officer
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata
Jun-30-2003
Direct Taxation
(2004)83TTJ(Kol.)886
1. The assessee is in appeal against the order of the learned CIT(A) who confirmed the penalty levied under Section 271B by the AO holding that the assessee had not enclosed the tax audit report as...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDevki Nandan Sharma (Dr.) Vs. Director of Education (Higher Education) ...
Allahabad
Jan-19-2001
Service
Uttar Pradesh Higher Education Service Commission Act, 1980 - Sections 4; Uttar Pradesh State Universities Act, 1973 - Sections 37(2)
(2001)1UPLBEC690
Ashok Khare, Adv.
S.R. Singh, J.1. These petitions are inter connected in the sense that the orders sought to be quashed in Writ Petition No. 43156 of 2000 is the basis of claim in the other one. Dr. Shiv...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskG.C. Oil Mills Vs. Kundan Mal
Rajasthan
Apr-28-1995
Civil
1995(2)WLN240
Shri. Ashok Choudhary
Arun Madan, J.1. The petitioner, who is a judgment-debtor in Civil Suit No., 19/85 and against whom a decree has been passed by the Court of Addl. District Judge No. 3, Jaipur City, Jaipur, for recovery...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Daljeet Kaur Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Guwahati
Sep-15-1989
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 263 and 263(1)
J.P. Bhattacharjee, G.K. Joshi, B.P. Todi and B.L. Agarwal, Advs.
A. Raghuvir, C.J. 1. This reference is made at the instance of the assessee under the Income-tax Act, 1961. Daljeet Kaur is the assessee in the case. She was married on April 13, 1975. Her spouse...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBrij Mohandas Gokulchand Vs. Narsinghdas Manoharilal and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Apr-17-1971
CommercialLimitation
Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 14 - Schedule - Article 22; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 34 - Order 7, Rule 10
AIR1971MP243
J.M. Anand and ;B.L. Agarwal, Advs.
Bhave, J. 1. This is plaintiff's appeal. 2. The plaintiff's case was that he had deposited Rs. 10,500/- with Manoharilal, the original defendant, on condition that the defendant shall pay out of the said amount any...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »