Advanced Search Results
Rajinder Singh @ Manu and Bijoy Singh Vs. State of West Bengal
Kolkata
May-14-2004
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 120B and 302; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 207, 304 and 313; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 137 and 146; ;Arms Act - Sections 25 and 27
2004(3)CHN99,2004CriLJ4023
Dilip Dutt, ;Jyotirmoy Adhikari, ;Anasuya Sinha, ;D. Mitra and ;Avishek Sinha, Advs. in Cr. A. No. 333 of 2002, ;Sekhar Basu, ;D. Roy, ;Kallol Mondal and ;Firoj Edulji, Advs. in Cr. A. No. 348 of 2002
Arun Kumar Bhattacharya, J. 1. The hearing stems from 14 sets of appeals preferred by 19 convicts against the judgment and order of their conviction and sentence passed on 31.08.2002 by Mr. Intaj Ali Shah, ld....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGundila Manjappa Shetty Vs. Manjakke Shedthi and ors.
Karnataka
Nov-18-1960
Property
Easements Act, 1882 - Sections 7 and 35; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 47 - Order 2, Rule 2 - Order 21, Rule 32(1) and 32(5)
AIR1961Kant268; AIR1961Mys268; ILR1961KAR67
N.T. Raghunathan, Adv. for ;M. Gopala Krishna Shetty, Adv.
1. This is a judgment-debtor's appeal from an order made against him in execution proceedings.2. In a suit brought by the decree-holder, who is the respondent in this appeal, a permanent injunction was made against the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPaul Vs. Cheeran Narayanan
Kerala
Mar-08-1968
PropertyCivil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21, Rule 32(1)
AIR1969Ker232
S. Narayanan Potti and; N.K. Varkey, Advs.
T.S. Krishnamoorthy Iyer, J.1. The plaintiff-decree-holder is the appellant, and the matter arises in execution of the decree. The judgment-debtor is admittedly a kudiki-dappukaran in the plaint property belonging to the decree-holder. The decree is for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
G. Venkat Ram Reddy Vs. the State
Andhra Pradesh
Jan-09-1990
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 441(4)
1990CriLJ2741
B. Krishna Rao, Adv.
ORDER1. This Criminal Revision is preferred by the accused in S.C. No. 126 of 1985 on the file of the II Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge. Hyderabad against order dated 22-12-1989 dismissing Crl.M.P. No. 819 of 1989....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVenkatamma and ors. Vs. the Special Land Acquisition Officer, City Imp ...
Karnataka
Jan-31-1972
Property
City of Mysore Improvement Act, 1903 - Sections 14, 14(2), 14(3), 15, 16, 16(2), 17, 18, 18(1) and 23(2); Mysore Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 4(2), 5, 5A, 6, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 23, 23(1), 23(2) and 50(2); Constituion of India - Article 31; Mysore High Court Act, 1961 - Sections 7(1); Bihar Town Planning and Improvement Trust Act, 1951; Kanpur Urban Area Development Act, 1945; City of Bangalore Improvement Act - Sections 27
AIR1972Kant193; AIR1972Mys193
B. Krishna Rao and ;R.J. Babu, Advs.
E.S. Venkatakamiah, J. 1. The question of law referred to the Full Bench in all the above cases is as follows:-- 'Whether the relevant date for determining the market value of the property acquired under the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskC.S. Reddy Vs. Yamuna Reddy
Karnataka
Sep-20-1974
Family
Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 - Sections 6 and 13; Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 - Sections 7, 17, 17(1), 17(2) and 25; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 9
AIR1975Kant134; ILR1975KAR537; 1975(1)KarLJ306
B. Krishna Rao, Adv. for ;B.K. Ramachandra Rao, Adv.
Honniah, J.1. This is an appeal from the decision of the District Judge, Bangalore, on petition presented by the father of two minors under Section 6 of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act 1956, hereinafter referred...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskN. Balakrishna Hegde Vs. K. Shankara Hegde and ors.
Karnataka
Feb-23-1961
ServiceConstitution
Constitution of India - Article 16
AIR1962Kant233; AIR1962Mys233
Krishnarao, ;N.G. Kamath and ;B. Krishna Rao, Advs.
Narayana Pal, J.(1) The point of controversy in this Writ Petition is the propriety of an order of appointment made in respect of the office of the patel of Anjar village, Udipi Taluk, South Kanara District....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShri K. Ramadas Shenoy Vs. the Chief Officers, Town Municipal Council, ...
Supreme Court of India
Aug-09-1974
Media and CommunicationConstitution
Madras Town Planning Act, 1920
AIR1974SC2177; (1974)2SCC506; [1975]1SCR680; 1974(6)LC553(SC)
S.V. Gupte,; K.N. Bhatt and; B. Krishna Rao, Advs
A.N. Ray, C.J.1. This is an appeal by special leave from the judgment dated 22 September, 1972 of the High Court of Mysore.2. Vidya Varidhi Thirtha Swaraiar of Shri Kaniyoor Muth, Udipi is the third respondent....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSista Venkatachalam Vs. Bhamidipalli Saramma
Chennai
Nov-03-1952
Insurance
Hindu Law; Madras Local Boards Act, 1920; Provident Funds Rules - Rules 5, 10 and 10(2); Provident Funds Act, 1925 - Sections 2
AIR1953Mad508; (1953)IMLJ337
M.S. Ramachandra Rao and ;B. Krishna Rao, Advs.
Rajagopalan, J.1. The plaintiff-respondent in, second appeal is the mother of the late Venkatanarayana who died without issue on 21-11-1937. Subhadramma was the widow of Venkatanarayana. On his death, she succeeded to his separate properties which...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMr. Sakil Mohammed Vakil Khan Vs. Dr. Miss PerIn Irani and Others
Mumbai
Feb-01-1999
Consumer
Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 2(1)
1999(4)BomCR65
Sanjeev Ahooja @ ;Dr. Kamath, Adv.
ORDERSmt. Rajyalakshmi Rao, Member1. The complainant Mr. Sakil Mohammed Vakil Khan filed this complaint on behalf of his wife Mrs. SalmaKhan for negligence against Dr. Perin Irani-anaesthetist, O.P. No. 1- Dr.C.K. Dave-Anesthetist O.P. No. 2 and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »