Advanced Search Results

Banerji Memorial Club represented by its Secretary P.V. Thomas Vs. Tal ...

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

Ashok Bhushan, C.J. 1. This Writ Appeal has been filed against the judgment and order dated 16.10.2008 by which W.P(C) No.28735 of 2008 filed by the appellant has been dismissed. Writ Petition was filed by the...

Manmohan Singh and anr. Vs. the Director of Estates,

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. B. Krishan

1. The applicants are aggrieved by the letter issued by the respondents dated 14.3,1997 rejecting their request for regularisation of allotment of Government Quarter No. C-101, Hanuman Road, New Delhi, in the name of Applicant 1...

Sharma Montessori Sch.and Oriental College Vs. Socy Vs. Uoi and ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. B. Krishan

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:23. 04.2013 W.P.(C) 3219/2000 SHARMA MONTESSORI SCH.& ORIENTAL COLLEGE Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. B. Krishan, Adv. versus SOCY VS. UOI & ORS...

Atul Anand and Anr Vs. M M Bhardwaj

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 156/2015 & CM34782015 (stay) Decided on:22. d May, 2015 % ATUL ANAND & ANR Through ..... Petitioners Mr. Deepak Agarwal, Adv. versus M M...

Collector of C. Ex. Vs. Vikshara Trading and Invest. P. Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Reported in : 2003(157)ELT4(SC); 2003(27)PTC603(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Nisha Bagchi,; K.C. Kaushik and; B. Krishan Prasad, Advs

ORDERCivil Appeal No. 2240/1997 1. There are two respondents in this appeal. Insofar as respondent No. 1 - M/s. Vikshara Trading & Investment Pvt. Ltd. is concerned the Tribunal has fully discussed the matter and decided...

Jitender Singh Bhatia Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Commercial

Reported in : 2002IVAD(Delhi)167; 96(2002)DLT384; 2002(62)DRJ179

Advocate for Appellant : B. Krishan, adv

Manmohan Sarin, J.1. Rule.With the consent of the parties, writ petition is taken up for disposal.2. Petitioner has filed this writ petition, seeking a writ of certiorari to quash the decision dated 21.8.2000, passed by respondent...

Amar Singh Vs. Jai Singh and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 40, Rule 1

Reported in : 31(1987)DLT82

Advocate for Appellant : B. Krishan and; G.D. Gandhi, Advs

Sunanda Bhandare, J. (1) This civil revision is directed against the order of the Additional District Judge. Delhi dated 2nd December 1985 passed on an application filed by the plaintiff under Order 40, Rule 1 read...

Smt. Dhanpati Devi Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 - Sections 9

Reported in : 2003VIAD(Delhi)410; 112(2004)DLT610

Advocate for Appellant : B. Krishan, Adv

Badar Durrez Ahmed, J.1. In this petition, the petitioner has prayed for the quashing and setting aside of, inter alia, the judgment and order dated 5.11.98 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Delhi in appeals...

Smt. Ganeshi Bai Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 - Sections 4(2) and 4(3); ;Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Rules, 1971 - Rule 4 and 4(3)

Reported in : 122(2005)DLT140; 2005(83)DRJ1

Advocate for Appellant : B. Krishan, Adv

Vikramajit Sen, J. 1. 'Be you never so high, the law is above you' is an acclaimed oft quoted aphorism of over three centuries vintage. In Regina vs. Woodley the Chief Justice had remarked that -...

Shri Subhash Bindra Vs. Govt. of Nct and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17

Reported in : 95(2002)DLT891; 2002(61)DRJ265

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. B. Krishan, Adv

Mukul Mudgal, J.1. CM.9040/01, filed by the petitioner under Order VI Rule 17 CPC seeks amendment in the writ petition. None of the parties have any objection to this application being allowed. Application is accordingly allowed....