Advanced Search Results

Simplex Engineering and Foundry and ors. Vs. Ministry of Railways and ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration and Conciliation

Acts : Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 34, 11, 36; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Section 115

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Pramod B. Agarwala; Mr. P.J. Mehta, Advs.

1. In these Appeals, a neat question of law has been raised which is of grave general importance. Some learned Single Judges have adopted the practice, while dealing with Objections under Section 34 of the Arbitration...

Jorhat Tea and Industries (P.) Ltd. Vs. State of Meghalaya

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 3(1), 58A and 58(2); Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 1975 - Rules 1, 2, 2(6), 3(1), 10 and 11; Companies (Amendment) Act, 1974 - Sections 58A(3), 58A(4), 58A(5) and 58A(6); Companies (Amendment) Act, 1998 - Sections 58; Mines Act - Sections 66 and 79; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 468, 468(3) and 482

Advocate for Appellant : A.K. Bhattacharyya, P.C. Borpujari and B.K. Singh, Advs.

B.K. Sharma, J.1. By this application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, the petitioner seeks quashing of the criminal proceeding in C.R. Case No. 364/98 which at the time of moving the application...

Nand Lal Singh Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Subject : Civil

Acts : Bihar Agricultural Produce Market Committees Act, 1960 - Sections 4, 9 and 14

Advocate for Appellant : R.N. Mukhopadhya and Dhananjay Kumar, Advs.B.K. Singh 'Chouhan' and Binod Kumar Singh, Advs.

S.N. Jha and P.M. Yadav, JJ. 1. This writ petition coming on reference by a learned Single Judge of this Court involves interpretation of Section 9 (4)(i) of the Bihar Agriculture Produce Market Committee Act, 1960...

Hyderabad Lamps Ltd. Vs. Asiatic Oxygen Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Company

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138

Reported in : [1998]93CompCas851(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : B.K. Singh, Adv.

M. Karpagavinayagam, J.1. These revisions are directed against the orders passed in Crl. M.P. Nos. 1382 and 1383 of 1996 in C.C. Nos. 214 and 215 of 1995 dated November 7, 1996, on the file of...

Pandian Vs. V. Sowrirajan

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 118, 138 and 139; Evidence Act - Sections 73 and 101; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313

Reported in : 1999CriLJ1364

Advocate for Appellant : B.K. Singh, Adv.

ORDERM. Karpagavinayagam, J.1. Pandian is the petitioner in Crl. R. C. No. 104 Of 1997 challenging the conviction and sentence for the offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act to undergo R.I. for one year...

Ravi Shah and anr. Etc. Vs. State and anr. Etc.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 304B and 498A

Reported in : II(1999)DMC582

Advocate for Appellant : S. Ramaswamy and ;B.K. Singh, Advs.

M. Karpagavinayagam, J.1. These appeal and revision are being disposed of by this common judgment, as both arise out of a single case and the parties are the same.2. Ravi Shah and Narayan Shah (Al and...

Ravi Shah and anr. Etc. Vs. State and Etc.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 103, 105 and 106; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 302, 304, 304(B), 306, 498 and 498(A); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 174 and 313

Reported in : 1999CriLJ188

Advocate for Appellant : S. Ramasamy, Adv. and ;B.K. Singh, Adv. in Cri. R.C. No. 485/93

M.K. Arpagavinayagam, J.1. These appeal and revision are being disposed of by this common judgment, as both arise out of a single case and the parties are the same.2. Ravi Shah and Narayan Shah (A1 and...

M/S Loknath Prasad Gupta Vs. Cce, New Delhi

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Excise

Advocate for Appellant : For the Appellant : S.K. Bagaria, Sr. Advocate, Shri Gopal Prasad. For the Respondent : B.K. Singh, Jt CDR, Nitin Pathak, DR.

Archana Wadhwa, Member (Judicial) The prayer in the application is to dispense with the condition of pre-deposit of duty of Rs. 14,55,88,277/- confirmed against the applicant for the period 1.4.2006 to 29.2.08 along with imposition of...

Mrs. Mani Shandly and anr. Vs. the State and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Delhi Municipal Corporation Act - Sections 347 and 461; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 71, 76, 82, 82(2), 82(1), 83, 87, 89, 251, 436 and 446; Delhi High Court Rules - Rule 3

Reported in : 2008(102)DRJ578

Advocate for Appellant : Arjun Bhandari and; B.K. Singh, Advs

Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J.1. Temperance is the hallmark of judicial authority. The exercise of judicial authority is not 'show of strength' but a duty to be performed with humility and yet firmness. This cardinal principle seems...

Cce, Lucknow Vs. M/S India Polyfibres Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Excise

Advocate for Appellant : Shri B.K. Singh, Authorized Representative (Jt. CDR) for the appellant. S/Shri J.C. Patel, Tarun Gulati and Sparsh Bhargava, Advocates for the Respondent.

The facts leading to filing of this appeal by Revenue are, in brief, as under. 1.1 The respondents are manufacturer of Polyester staple fiber (PSF) chargeable to Central Excise Duty under Chapter 55 of the Central...