Advanced Search Results
Laxmi Narasingha Swami Mahapravu and anr. Vs. Patta Sahuani and ors.
Orissa
Apr-26-1956
Contract
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100 and 101; Hindu Law; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 230, 235 and 237
AIR1957Ori86
B.K. Pal and ;A.K. Tripathy, Advs.
P.V.B. Rao, J.1. The appellant is the Collector of Ganjam who was appointed Receiver in Title Suit No. 44 of 1948 which was a suit for succession to the Mahantship of Haradakhandi Muth. He filed the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDraupadi Beherani and anr. Vs. Sambari Behera and ors.
Orissa
Apr-08-1958
FamilyProperty
Hindu Law; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 5
AIR1958Ori242
B.K. Pal, Adv.
G.C. Das, J.1. This is an appeal by the plaintiffs against a reversing judgment of the learned Subordinate Judge of Berhampur dated 31-1-1953. The plaintiffs commenced an action for recovery of possession of certain lands with...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBanchhanidhi Giri and ors. Vs. Mst. Jema and ors.
Orissa
Oct-28-1960
Family
Hindu Law
AIR1962Ori48
B.K. Pal, Adv.
S. Barman, J.1. The question,--whether, in the circumstances of the case, there was partition by severance of status, though not by metes and bounds,--is the only point involved in this second appeal filed by the plaintiff...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Bhikari Prusti Vs. Madan Mohan Jiu Thakur and ors.
Orissa
Oct-23-1952
Civil
Hinud Law; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 4; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101 to 103
AIR1953Ori73
B.K. Pal, Adv.
Mohapatra, J.1. This is a defendant's Second Appeal against the reversing judgment of Sri C.C. Coari, District Judge of Cuttack, decreeing the plaintiffs' suit for declaration of the deed of Sebasamarpanpatra as invalid.2. The deity (Madan...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSouth Eastern Railway Vs. Epari Satyanarayana
Orissa
Apr-18-1960
Civil
Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 72; Goods Tariff General Rules - Rule 15
AIR1961Ori141
B.K. Pal, Adv.
ORDERS. Barman, J.1. The defendant railway is the petitioner in this Civil Revision directed against the judgment of the S. C. C. Judge, Berhampur, in S. C. C. Suit No. 120 of 1957 whereby the learned...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNilmoni Hota Vs. Govinda Chandra Das
Orissa
Sep-26-1950
Tenancy
Tenancy Law; Orissa Tenancy Act, 1913 - Sections 26(2); Bengal Tenancy Act, 1885 - Sections 22(2)
AIR1951Ori233; 16(1950)CLT245
B.K. Pal, Adv.
Panigrahi, J.1. This appeal raises a point of some novelty but not of difficulty. The facts necessary to be stated are that the father of the deft-applt was the owner of two-thirds share in touzi No....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKartik Ramachandran R. Vs. P.O., Labour Court and anr.
Delhi
Oct-19-2005
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 4(4), 10(1), 12(5) and 25F; Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1972; Apprentices Act, 1961
[2006(109)FLR100]; (2006)IILLJ160Del
B.K. Pal, Adv
Gita Mittal, J.1. The issue in the present case is as to whether a 'trainee steno clerk expeditor' would be covered within the definition of workman under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India (Uoi) Vs. the Cuttack Cycle Supply and Co.
Orissa
Apr-07-1964
Civil
Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 74D; Railways (Amendment) Act, 1961
AIR1965Ori4
B.K. Pal and ;Bijoy Pal, Advs.
S. Barman, J.1. Defendant No. 1 Union of India as owner of South Eastern Railway is the appellant. The suit out of which this appeal arises was filed by the plaintiff against the Railway and also...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India (Uoi) Vs. Mahammad Khan
Orissa
Aug-04-1958
Civil
Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 71; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 403
AIR1959Ori103
B.K. Pal, Adv. (in F.A. No. 4 of 1951) and ;P.C. Chatterji, Adv. (in F.A. No. 5 of 1951)
S. Barman, J. 1. The defendants are appellants from a decision of the Additional Subordinate Judge of Sambalpur, granting a decree in favour of the plaintiff- respondent against the defendants-appellants to the extent of Rs. 8,902/6/-,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Sheobux Satyanarayan
Orissa
Jul-24-1962
Civil
Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 72 and 72(1); Railways (Amendment) Act, 1961; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 73 and 161
AIR1963Ori68
B.K. Pal, Adv.
G.K. Misra, J. 1. Defendants are the appellants against the reversing judgment of the learned District Judge of Cuttack decreeing the plaintiffs' claim for Rs. 680/10/- in each of the suits. Second appeal No. 240/60 and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »