Advanced Search Results

Ram Pal Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300

Reported in : 2004CriLJ2972

Advocate for Appellant : B.K. Nigam, Amicus Curiae

Kamal Kishore, J.1. This is an appeal against the judgment and order dated 13-2-1998, passed by the then learned III additional Sessions Judge, Rae Bareli sentencing the convict appellant to undergo imprisonment for life for the...

Barkat Ullah Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300 and 304

Reported in : 2004CriLJ4482

Advocate for Appellant : B.K. Nigam, ;Mrudul Rakesh and ;Krishna Mohan, Advs.

Vishnu Sahai, J. 1. This appeal has been preferred by Barkat Ullah against the judgment and order dated 30-4-1981, passed by the Sessions Judge, Sultanpur, in Sessions Trial No. 41 of 1981, whereby he has been...

Asha Ram and anr. Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300

Reported in : 2004CriLJ4470

Vishnu Sahai, J. 1. Six persons, namely, Asha Ram, Magan, Chandrika, Ram Chhattar, Shiv alias Shiv Prasad and Ghan Shyam were tried by the IInd Additional Sessions Judge, Bahraich in Sessions Trial No. 70 of 1997...

Shri Bhola Sugar Mills (P.) Ltd. Vs. State of U. P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Khandsari Sugar Manufacturer Licensing Order, 1967; Constitution of India - Article 226; Uttar Pradesh Sugarcane (Purchase Tax) Act, 1961

Reported in : 1999(1)AWC811

Advocate for Appellant : B.K. Nigam, ;Krishna Mohan and ;S.C. Misra, Advs.

R.H. Zaidi, J.1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and also perused the record.2. By means of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner prays for issuance of a writ, order or...

State of U.P. Vs. Balak Ram and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 149 and 307; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 378

Reported in : 2004CriLJ1549

Advocate for Appellant : B.K. Nigam, Addl. Public Prosecutor

Vishnu Sahai, J.1. This appeal has been preferred by the State of U.P. against the judgment and order dated 6-12-1979, passed by III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Hardoi, in Sessions Trial No. A-9 of 1979,...

M.P.Nauriyal Vs. Delhi Development Authority

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: March 10, 2015 + W.P.(C) 8045/2012 M.P.NAURIYAL Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.R.K.Saini, Advocate. Versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Respondent Represented by:...

Khedat Mazdoor Chetna Sangath Vs. State of M.P. and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 21 and 141; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 406

Reported in : AIR1995SC31; 1995CriLJ508; JT1994(6)SC60; 1994(4)SCALE40; (1994)6SCC260; 1994(2)LC771(SC)

ORDERS. Mohan, J.1. The petitioner Khedat Mazdoor Chetna Sangath is a registered Trade Union of Bhil, Bhilala, Mankar and Nasik tribals of Alirajpur Tehsir in Jhabua District of Madhya Pradesh. It was started in October 1982....

M.P. Dwivedi and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Police Regulations - Regulation 465; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 148, 231 to 254, 302 to 304, 307 to 308, 311 and 395

Reported in : AIR1996SC2299; 1996(1)ALD(Cri)789; (1997)1GLR39; (1996)4SCC152; [1996]1SCR347

Advocate for Appellant : G.L. Sanghi,; Prashant Bhushan,; Sakesh Kumar,;

ORDER1. These contempt proceedings have been initiated in pursuance of the order dated June 4, 1993 passed in Writ Petition No. 239 of 1993, Khedut Mazdoor Chetna Sangath v. State of Madhya Pradesh and Ors. The...

Smt. Indira Rai Vs. Iaf Educational and Cultural Society and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 20

Reported in : 94(2001)DLT282

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. D.P. Sharma and; Mr. Sandeep Shrama, Advs

ORDERVijender Jain, J. 1. The claimant filed a suit No. 288/90 under Section 20 of the Arbitrator Act, 1940 for appointment of Arbitrator in terms of Arbitration Clause in the Contract. This Court on 27th September,...