Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: b k mall · Page 1 of about 4 results (0.144 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 09 1986

Commissioner of Income-tax, Calcutta Vs. Biju Patnaik

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-09-1986

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 256(2)

Reported in : AIR1986SC1428; (1986)58CTR(SC)65; [1986]160ITR674(SC); 1986(1)SCALE885; (1986)3SCC310; [1986]3SCR26

Advocate for Appellant : P.N. Gupta and; P.N. Mishra, Advs

Sabyasachi Mukharji, J.1. Whether, question of law referable to the High Court, arises out of the order of the Appellate Income-tax Tribunal in this case, is, the question that arises in these appeals by special leave...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 25 1993

Lachhmi Batri Vs. the State

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Jun-25-1993

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 299, 302, 320 and 326

Reported in : 1994CriLJ1171

Advocate for Appellant : B.K. Mall, Adv.

A. Pasayat, J.1. In this appeal from jail Lachhmi Batri (hereinafter referred to as the 'accused') calls in question legality of his conviction for an offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 18 1963

Kalinga Tubes Ltd. and ors. Vs. Shanti Prasad JaIn and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Apr-18-1963

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 3, 9, 31, 81, 105C, 166, 172, 173, 255 to 259, 397, 397(1), 398, 399(1), 399(3), 402, 403 and 433; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 2; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114; Companies (Amendment) Act, 1960

Reported in : AIR1963Ori189

Advocate for Appellant : B.K. Pal, S. Choudhury and Bijoy Pal, Advs.;Attorney General of India, ;R. Choudhury, ;M.K. Banerjee, ;B.C. Sen and ;S. Patnaik, Advs. (in No. 13/61), ;B.K. Behura, Adv. (in No. 2/62), ;P.C. Misra, Ad

Misra, J.1. AHO. 13/61-- This appeal arises out of an application by Sri Shanti Prasad Jain under Sections 397, 398, 402 and 403 of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter caned the Act). As there are large...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 20 1961

Shanti Prasad JaIn Vs. Kalinga Tubes Ltd. and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Nov-20-1961

Subject : Company

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114 and 115; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 10, 81, 173, 397 to 407 and 643; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 11 - Order 8, Rule 2

Reported in : AIR1962Ori202

Advocate for Appellant : B.N. Dutta Roy, ;S. Rai Choudhury, ;R.N. Misra and ;G. Das, Advs.

ORDERS. Barman, J. 1. Sri Shanti Prasad Jain, an industrialist and financier,--who until lately was Chairman of the Board of Directors of Kalinga Tubes Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the Company), is the petitioner in the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial