Advanced Search Results

Sonam Zangpo Bhutia Vs. State of Sikkim

Court : Sikkim

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 201, 302, 380 and 382

Reported in : 2005CriLJ1937

Advocate for Appellant : B.K. Gupta, Legal Aid Counsel

A.P. Subba, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 31-5-2002 passed by Shri S. W. Lepcha, learned Sessions Judge (East & North) at Gangtok in Criminal Case No. 21 of 2002 convicting the appellant...

Pema Tamang Vs. State of Sikkim

Court : Sikkim

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300, 302 and 304

Reported in : 2006CriLJ2999

Advocate for Appellant : B.K. Gupta, Adv.

N. Surjamani Singh, J.1. This appeal is directed against judgment dated 28-3-2005 and order of sentence dated 31-3-2005 passed by the learned Sessions Judge (Special Division-II) Sikkim at Gangtok in Sessions trial case No. 3 of...

Resham Bai Vs. Shakuntalabai

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Family

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 384

Reported in : II(2000)DMC724

Advocate for Appellant : B.K. Gupta, Adv.

ORDERA.M. Sapre, J.1. The decision rendered in this appeal shall also govern the disposal of other connected MA being MA 8/98 as both these appeals arise out of one case and questions the legality and validity...

Arbind Chettri Vs. State of Sikkim

Court : Sikkim

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302, 304 and 324; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 428

Reported in : 2005CriLJ984

Advocate for Appellant : B.K. Gupta, Legal Aid Counsel

A.P. Subba, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 13-8-2001 and order dated 28-8-2001 passed by Dr. S. W. Lepcha, Sessions Judge (East and North) in Criminal Case No. 7 of 2000, convicting the...

Panna Lal Gupta Vs. State of Sikkim

Court : Sikkim

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2010CriLJ825

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. B. K. Gupta

Aftab H. Saikia, C.J.1. Heard Mr. A. Moulik, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. B. K. Gupta, learned Counsel for the appellant. Also heard Mr. J. B. Pradhan, learned Public Prosecutor with Mr. Karma Thinlay, learned...

Dabur India Ltd Vs. M/S Mughals Herbal Products and anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property

* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 388/2009 Decided on:18. h September, 2013 % DABUR INDIA LTD Through ..... Plaintiff Ms. Meenakshi Singh, Adv. versus M/S MUGHAL'S HERBAL PRODUCTS & ANR...

Decta Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Authority for Advance Rulings

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (1999)237ITR190AAR

For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: B.K. Gupta, F.C.A. and Sandeep Malhotra, Adv.For Respondents/Defendant: R.K. Tanwar, Assistant Commissionr of Income-tax 1. This application under Section 245Q(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ("the Act"), raises a very interesting question for consideration.2....

B.R. Singhal Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1985)14ITD380(Delhi)

1. This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the AAC relating to the assessment year 1978-79. In order to understand the grounds of appeal, it appears that some background facts may...

Krishna Prasad and ors. Vs. Shyam Narayan Prasad and ors.

Court : Sikkim

Subject : FamilyProperty

Reported in : AIR2006Sik25

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. N. G. Sherpa

A.P. Subba, J. 1. This Appeal is directed against the Judgment and Decree dated 19th November, 2004 passed by the learned District Judge, Special Division-II, Sikkim in Title Appeal No. 2 of 2003, who had dismissed...

Dabur India Ltd. Vs. Alka Ayurvedic Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trademark Act, 1999 - Sections 17, 28(3), 29, 30(2) and 124

Reported in : 164(2009)DLT131; 2009(41)PTC614(Del)

Advocate for Appellant : Sudhir Chandra, Sr. Adv.,; Sudhir K. Makkar and; Meenakshi

Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J.1. The application of the plaintiff for interim injunction in a suit for permanent injunction restraining infringement of trademark and passing off, is for consideration. The plaintiff as registered proprietor of trademark 'HAJMOLA'...