Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: b k choudhry · Page 1 of about 8 results (0.061 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 24 1976

Bansi Dhar Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-24-1976

Subject : Service

Acts : Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1968 - Rule 25

Reported in : 1977LabIC1636; 1977RLR100

Advocate for Appellant : G.D. Gupta,; B.K. Choudhry and; U.S. Dhir, Advs

H.L. Anand, J.(1) The principal question that this petition raises is as to the interpretation of Rule 25 of the Railway Servants (Discipline & Appeal) Rules, 1958 (for short, the Rules) and in particular whether the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 23 1972

N.K. Baslas Vs. Krishan Lal

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-23-1972

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 15(10)

Reported in : 1973RLR14

Advocate for Appellant : B.K. Choudhry and; R.S. Oberoi, Advs

V.S. Deshpande, J.(1) Landlord Krishan Lal let out his premises to tenant Baslas on an agreed rent of Rs. 250.00. It is not disputed that the tenant was using a telephone which was in the premises...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 05 1987

Sant Ram Sodhi Vs. G.N.S. Roddey

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-05-1987

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 15(1)

Reported in : 34(1988)DLT114

Advocate for Appellant : B.K. Choudhry and; Pardeep Nandrajog, Advs

H.C. Goel, J. (1) Sant Ram Sodhi, appellant, earlier had filed a petition for eviction of G.H.N.S. Roddey, respondent-tenant, from the demised premises in the court of the Additional Rent Controller on the ground of non-payment...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 23 1981

Ram Kali Devi and ors. Vs. Ramesh Chander and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-23-1981

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 22, Rule 3

Reported in : AIR1982Delhi14; 20(1981)DLT40; 1981RLR330

Advocate for Appellant : B.K. Choudhry,; Daya Kishan,; A.P. Singh and;

ORDER 43(1) An appeal shall lie from the following orders under .the provisions of Section 104, namely:- (a) ..................................... (k) an order under rule 9 of Order Xxii refusing to set aside the abatement or dismissal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 01 1997

Mansingh Gupta and Co. Vs. Ashok Kumar Jain

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-01-1997

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 35B

Reported in : 70(1997)DLT575

Advocate for Appellant : B.K. Choudhry, Adv

S.N. Kapoor, J.(1) This revision petition is directed against an order dated 30th January, 1989 rejecting an application to review closing plaintiff's evidence on the ground of non-payment of costs.(2) This order has been assailed by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 20 1987

P.K. Nangia Vs. the Land and Development Officer, New Delhi and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-20-1987

Subject : Property

Acts : Registration Act, 1872 - Sections 17

Reported in : AIR1988Delhi260; 1988(14)DRJ112

Advocate for Appellant : B.K. Choudhry and; A.C. Aggarwal, Advs

G.C. Jain, J. (1) ADMITTED.(2) The petitioner, Pushap Kumar Nangia, and three others, namely Smt. Sita Devi Nangia, Shashi Kumar Nangia and Ravinder Kumar Nangia, were the owners of property bearing No.32-E/21, East Patel Nagar, New...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 24 1992

Raj Kumari Walia Vs. P.N. Premanandan

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-24-1992

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 21

Reported in : 1993(25)DRJ17; 1992RLR531

Advocate for Appellant : B.K. Choudhry and; A.P. Aggarwal, Advs

Santosh Duggal, J.(1) This is landlady's petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, feeling aggrieved by an order passed by the Rent Control Tribunal dated 15th November 1990, whereby respondent/tenant's appeal was allowed....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 01 1996

Union of India Vs. Diwan Singh

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-01-1996

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 140

Reported in : 1996VAD(Delhi)566; 1996(39)DRJ820

Advocate for Appellant : S.S. Sabharwal,; Mona Aneja and ; B.K. Choudhry, Advs

Usha Mehra, J.(1) The Union of India felt aggrieved by the order of the Additional Senior Civil Judge whereby he accepted the appeal of the respondents thereby reversing the finding of the Sub Judge. The First...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial