Advanced Search Results

Tejmal Vs. Rajesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Stamp Act, 1983 - Sections 35 - Schedule - Article 23; Stamp Duty Act - Sections 36 and 61; Bombay Stamp Act

Reported in : AIR2006MP131; 2006(2)MPHT149

Advocate for Appellant : B.I. Mehta, Adv.

ORDERN.K. Mody, J.1. Being aggrieved by the Order dated 1-11-2004 passed by IInd ADJ, Indore, in Civil Suit No. 1-A/2003 whereby the objection of the petitioner that the document in question is not properly stamped was...

Shri Faloudi Pulse Mills Vs. M.P. Financial Corpn.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Company

Acts : State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 - Sections 29; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : [2004]52SCL18(MP)

Advocate for Appellant : B.I. Mehta, Adv.

ORDERA.K. Shrivastava, J.1. The petitioner by this Writ Petition has prayed this Court to invoke extraordinary jurisdiction conferred under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India for granting the following relief :(a) That, the...

Dr. Naresh Purohit Vs. Dr. P.K. Shobhana

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act,1955 - Sections 13(1)

Reported in : AIR1999MP108; 1999(1)MPLJ714

Advocate for Appellant : B.I. Mehta, Adv.

J.G. Chitare, J. 1. Shri B.I. Mehta submitted that the learned trial Judge has committed an error of law in not accepting the evidence of the petitioner which has been totally unchallenged. He further pointed-out that...

Smt. Snehlata Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2006)200CTR(Mad)317

Advocate for Appellant : B.I. Mehta, for the Petitioner , A. Patankar, for the Respondents

ORDERS.L. Kochar, J.The petitioner has filed this petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 30-12-1999 passed and conveyed to the petitioner by respondent No. 2, CIT, Bhopal (Annex. P/1) whereby,...

Acce Vs. Priyakant Carbon and Chemical Industries Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Excise

Reported in : 2001(96)LC17(Gujarat)

M.S. Shah, J.1. This application has been preferred by the Assistant Commissioner, Central Excise (Rural Division), Ahmedabad-II praying for a direction to the Customs, Excise & Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, West Regional Branch at Mumbai to...

Mangilal and ors. Vs. Dambarlal and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR2008MP118; 2008(1)MPHT68; 2007(4)MPLJ200

ORDERViney Mittal, J.1. The plaintiffs are the petitioners before this Court. They are aggrieved against an order dated November 8, 2006 passed by the Trial Judge, whereby an application filed by the plaintiffs under Section 49...

Commissioner of Central Excise, Ahmedabad-i Vs. Gujarat Medicraft Pvt. ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 52A and 57G; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35H

Reported in : 2001(75)ECC256

Advocate for Appellant : P.J. Davawala, Adv.

M.S. Shah, J.1. All these applications are filed by the concerned Commissioner of Central Excise under Section 35H of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The question sought to be raised in these applications is - 'whether...

Kantilal Moghabhai Solanki Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Service

Reported in : (1992)1GLR561

R.K. Abichandani, J.1. The petitioner, who was a Superintendent of Prohibition and Excise (Class-11) seeks to challenge the impugned order dated 9th April, 1986 removing him from service.2. By charge-sheet dated 1st September, 1982 issued against...

Banne Singh Vs. Proprietor, Ambar Hawai Chhappal and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 3

Reported in : II(2001)ACC26; [2000(87)FLR830]; (2001)IIILLJ256MP

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. B.I. Mehta

A.M. Sapre, J.1. Appellant is challenging the dismissal of his application by the Commissioner Workmen's Compensation (Labour Court Indore) on December 9, 1996 in claim case No. 57/92, by filing this appeal under Section 30 of...

Asst. Commissioner, Central Excise (Rural Div.) Ahmedabad-ii Vs. Priya ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Excise

Reported in : 2001(75)ECC14

Advocate for Appellant : Bipin I. Mehta, Adv.

M.S. Shah, J.1. This application has been preferred by the Assistant Commissioner, Central Excise (Rural Division), Ahmedabad-II praying for a direction to the Customs, Excise & Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, West Regional Branch at Mumbai to...