Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: b g vaidya · Page 1 of about 15 results (0.088 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 14 1996

Parashram Gangadhar Fugat and anr. Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-14-1996

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302, 304(II) and 323; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 45 and 59; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 235

Reported in : 1996(5)BomCR741

Advocate for Appellant : B.G. Vaidya, Adv.

Vishnu Sahai, J.1. Vide judgment and order dated 31-12-1981 the Additional Sessions Judge, Nashik in Sessions Case No. 62 of 1981 convicted and sentenced the appellants in the manner stated hereinafter:---Appellant Parashram Gangadhar Fugat:--- (i) under...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 14 1996

Babu Bhika Jadhav Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-14-1996

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 147, 148, 149, 302, 303, 304, 307, 323, 324 and 325; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 147, 148, 149, 302 and 313; Evidence Act - Sections 101 and 105

Reported in : 1996CriLJ3952

Advocate for Appellant : B.G. Vaidya, Adv.

Vishnu Sahai, J. 1. The appellant aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 7-5-83 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nashik in Sessions Case No. 109 of 1982 convicting and sentencing him to undergo imprisonment for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 23 1994

Philip Bhimsent Aind Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-23-1994

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300, 302, 304, 307, 392, 394 and 397; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 377(1) and 377(3); Evidence Act - Sections 114

Reported in : 1995CriLJ1694

Advocate for Appellant : K.R. Sutrale, Adv.

Vishnu Sahai, J.1. As both these matters arise from the same set of facts we propose disposing them of by a common judgment.2. The appellant Philip Bhimsent Aind has challenged his convictions and sentences for offences...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 27 1994

Ashok Nivruti Desai and Others Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-27-1994

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 109, 354, 363, 366, 376 and 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313

Reported in : 1995(1)BomCR288; (1994)96BOMLR167; 1995CriLJ826

Advocate for Appellant : Mrs. V.V. Thorat, Adv.

1. Vide order dated 30-11-1987 passed by the IInd Additional Sessions Judge, Satara in Sessions Case No. 38 of 1987 the appellants were convicted and sentenced as under : Appellant No. 1 Ashok Nivruti Desai was...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 21 1994

Mrs. Nandabai Balu Dusing Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-21-1994

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 306 and 498A; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 32 and 60

Reported in : 1995(1)BomCR567

Advocate for Appellant : Anita Agarwal, Adv.

Vishnu Sahai, J.1. The appellant, aggrieved by the order dated 27-11-1987 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, in Sessions Case No. 52 of 1987, convicting her under section 498A I.P.C. and 306 I.P.C. and sentencing...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 07 1992

Babu Magbul Shaikh Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-07-1992

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1993(3)BomCR309; 1993CriLJ2808; 1993(2)MhLj1118

Advocate for Appellant : B.G. Vaidya, Adv.

1. A very unusual situation has arisen in this appeal. During the investigation, assistance of tracker-dog Kumar was made use of by the police and the bag and clothes of the accused were recovered with the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 22 1991

Jagannath Maruti Tekade Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-22-1991

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 161; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 5(1), 5(2) and 19; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3

Reported in : 1992(1)BomCR255; 1991(1)MhLj976

Advocate for Appellant : B.G. Vaidya, Adv.

M.F. Saldanha, J.1. The appellant in this case, at the relevant time working as a clerk under the Executive Magistrate at Nasik, was tried for a corruption charge in Special Case No. 2 of 1982 by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 17 2004

Hirabai Ramdas Vyavahare and anr. Vs. State

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-17-2004

Subject : CriminalFamily

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34 and 498A

Reported in : II(2004)DMC724

Advocate for Appellant : B.G. Vaidya, Adv.

P.B. Gaikwad, J.1. Original Accused Nos. 2 and 3, viz. Hirabai Ramdas Vyavahare and Sanjay Ramdas Vyavahare being dissatisfied with the order of conviction and sentence passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nashik dated 29th March,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 30 2000

M/S. Atul Textiles and Others Vs. Shivaji M. Shende and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-30-2000

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 33-C(2)

Reported in : 2000(3)BomCR857; (2001)ILLJ127Bom

Advocate for Appellant : B.G. Vaidya, Adv.

ORDERR.J. Kochar, J.1. These writ petitions have arisen from the Common Judgment and Order dated 16-3-1993 passed by the Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Sangli in Applications (IDA) Nos. 86/88 to 132/88 (47 in Nos.) against the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 19 2004

Shri Mallikarjun Gundappa Patil and ors. Vs. Ambadas Baburao Vardekara ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-19-2004

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Workmen's Compensation Act

Reported in : III(2004)ACC743; 2005(1)ALLMR21; 2004(6)BomCR626; [2005(105)FLR657]; 2005(2)MhLj124

Advocate for Appellant : B.G. Vaidya, Adv.

Nishita Mahatre, J.1. This First Appeal arises from the judgment and order of the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation. The Commissioner has assessed the compensation payable to the appellants on the basis that the deceased, who was...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial