Advanced Search Results

Commissioner of Customs and C. Ex. Vs. Kesari Steels

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : CivilExcise

Acts : Central Excises Act, 1944 - Sections 35G(3); Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 57A

Reported in : 1997(57)ECC91; 1996(87)ELT34(MP)

Advocate for Appellant : B.G. Neema, Adv.

ORDERA.R. Tiwari, J.1. The applicant (Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise, Indore) has filed this application Under Section 35G(3) of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 seeking direction to the Tribunal to state the case...

Shri Bajrang Extraction Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. the Secretary to the Go ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : AIR1993MP202

Advocate for Appellant : G.M. Chafekar and ;Saboo, Advs.;T.N. Singh, Addl. Adv. General;B.G. Neema, Adv.

V.S. Kokje, J. 1. The order passed in this case shall also govern the disposal of Misc. Petition No. 1559/90. 2-3. The petitioner/company carries on the business of extraction of oil by the solvent extraction process....

Union of India (Uoi) and anr. Vs. Chhajjoomal and Sons and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : ArbitrationLimitation

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 8, 20, 29, 30, 33 and 39

Reported in : 2002(5)MPHT354

Advocate for Appellant : B.G. Neema, Sr. Standing Counsel

ORDERA.K. Gohil, J.1. We are deciding these Misc. Appeals which have been preferred by both the parties under Section 39(vi) of the Arbitration Act, 1940 being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 29th March, 1985...

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Bajaj Tempo Ltd.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2 and 11A; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1945; Central Excise and Tariff (Amendment) Act, 1985; Constitution of India - Article 226; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 9(2)

Reported in : 1995(51)ECC102; 1995LC40(MP); 1995(80)ELT774(MP)

Advocate for Appellant : B.G. Neema, Adv.

ORDER1. This appeal and the other connected appeals have been preferred against the order of the learned Single Judge passed on 8-9-1994 in M.P. No. 779/89, M.P. No. 1099/88, M.P. No. 1101/88, M.P. No. 1356/88, M.P....

Shree Synthetics Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : SICA

Acts : Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 22

Reported in : [2001]107CompCas339(MP); 2000(72)ECC280; 2000(122)ELT338(MP)

Advocate for Appellant : Dholakiya and ;R. Saboo, Advs.

N.K. Jain, J. 1. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks quashment of the notice of detention dated August 12, 1997 (Annexure F) issued under Rule 230 of the...

Kirloskar Brothers Limited and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : CivilConstitution

Acts : Custom Act; Finance Act, 1995 - Sections 11BB, 27A, 28AA and 75; ;Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2001(75)ECC250; 2001(5)MPHT519

Advocate for Appellant : J.P. Gupta, Sr. Adv. and ;Abhyankar, Adv.

ORDERA.M. Sapre, J.1. Petitioner, a limited company, has filed this writ under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India, claiming following relief by way of issuance of writ of mandamus against the respondents:-'The petitioner be...

Neo Sack Ltd. (Export Division) Vs. Commr. of Cus. and C. Ex.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 143; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Custom (Provisional Duty Assessment) Regulations, 1963

Reported in : 2001(76)ECC145; 2001(132)ELT555(MP)

Advocate for Appellant : A.M. Mathur, Sr. Adv. and ;B. Pandya, Adv.

ORDERA.M. Sapre, J.1. What is challenged in this writ filed by the petitioner under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India is, an order dated 27-11-2000 (Annexure P5-A), passed by Deputy Commissioner of Customs...

General Foods Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Excise

Reported in : 1989(19)ECC183

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. A.K. Chitale, Shri. Chitale

ORDER1. Shri A.K. Chitale, learned Counsel for the petitioner; Shri J.P. Gupta, learned Counsel with Shri B.G. Neema, learned Counsel for the respondents. 2. Shri Gupta, learned Counsel for the respondents, stated that after the petition...

H. and R. Johnson (India) Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : ConstitutionExcise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 226 and 300A

Reported in : 1993(41)ECC283; 1992(61)ELT73(MP)

Advocate for Appellant : D.Y. Chandrachud, Adv.

ORDER1. Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, learned counsel for the petitioner heard on admission. Shri B.G. Neema learned standing counsel of G.O.I.2. This is a petition under Articles 226, 14 and 300A of the Constitution of India against...

Dayal Laminates Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Excise

Reported in : 1993(41)ECC9

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. S.L. Bagdi

ORDER2.11.19921. Heard Shri S.L. Bagdi, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Shri B.G. Neema, learned standing Counsel for the Union of India.2. Shri Bagdi submits that in view of the decision of the CEGAT, West Regional...