Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: b d sharma · Page 1 of about 511 results (0.144 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 07 1992

Kailash Lal Mathur Vs. Hindustan Zinc Ltd. and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Sep-07-1992

Subject : Service

Reported in : 1992WLN(UC)179

R.S. Verma, J.1. Both these writ petitions filed by Kailash Lal Mathur, as officer serving under respondents of 1 to 3, raise interconnected and interlinked questions of facts and law. Hence, they have been heard together...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 30 1970

Commissioner of Income-tax, Punjab Vs. Kulu Valley Transport Co. P. Lt ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-30-1970

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 22(1), 22(2A), 22(3), 24(2) and 24(3)

Reported in : AIR1970SC1734; [1970]77ITR518(SC); (1970)2SCC192; [1971]1SCR452

Advocate for Appellant : Jadish Swarup,; Solitcitor General and; B.D. Sharma, Adv

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeals Nos. 859 and 860 of 1966. Appeals from the judgment and order dated April 6, 1966 of the Punjab High Court in Income-tax Reference No. 42 of 1962. Jagadish Swarup,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 03 1992

Surendra Kumar Gyani Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-03-1992

Subject : Service

Reported in : AIR1993SC115; 1993(1)ALT9(SC); [1992(65)FLR878]; JT1992(5)SC293; (1993)IILLJ903SC; 1992(2)SCALE432; (1992)4SCC464; 1992(2)LC465(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Sushil Kumar Jain,; B.D. Sharma and; Aruneshwar Gupta, Advs

G.N. Ray, J.1. Civil Appeal No. 833 of 1986 and Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos. 6597-6686 and special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 12528 of 1986 have been heard analogously as the common question of law and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 06 2001

Ram Bharose Sharma Vs. Mahant Ram Swaroop and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-06-2001

Subject : PropertyTenancy

Acts : Jaipur Matmi Rules, 1945; Rajasthan Land Reforms and Resumption of Jagirs Act, 1952 - Sections 2, 22, 23 and 23(1); Rajasthan Public Trust Act, 1954; Indian Trusts Act, 1882

Reported in : 2001VIIIAD(SC)393; 2001(7)SCALE44; (2001)9SCC471

Advocate for Appellant : B.D. Sharma,; Narottam Vyas and; Vidyasagar, Advs

ORDER1. These two appeals arise from two judgments and orders of the Division bench of the High Court of Rajasthan at Jaipur. Civil Appeal No. 1616 of 1994 is from the judgment and order of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 24 1997

Tara Chand Vyas Vs. Chairman and Disciplinary Authority and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-24-1997

Subject : Service

Reported in : JT1997(3)SC500; (1997)IILLJ26SC; RLW1997(1)SC141; 1997(2)SCALE569; (1997)4SCC565; [1997]2SCR472

Advocate for Appellant : B.D. Sharma, Adv

ORDER1. The petitioner was imputed with the charges that while working as a Branch Manager of the respondent-Gramin Bank, Khareri Branch between March 17, 1982 to August 8, 1983, he deselected in the performance of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 26 1974

Dhiren Kiri Vs. Suraj Balram Sawhney and Sons

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-26-1974

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 30, Rule 1

Reported in : 10(1974)DLT211

Advocate for Appellant : B.D. Sharma and; K.L. Sethi, Advs

V.S. Deshpande, J. (1) What is the meaning of 'procedure'? Is Order Xxx rule-I Civil Procedure Code 'procedure' or substantive law The question arises in this way. (2) The petitioner Dr. Dhiren Kiri is a tenant...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 27 1974

R. Dhiren Kiri Vs. Suraj Balaram Sahni and Sons

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-27-1974

Subject : CivilTenancy

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 105

Reported in : ILR1974Delhi210; 1975RLR73

Advocate for Appellant : B.D. Sharma and; K.L. Sethi, Advs

V.S. Deshpande, J.(1) It is the distinction between the general principle of rest judicata (not confined to section 105 Civil Procedure Code) and the statutory finality of an order of remand under section 105(2) Civil Procedure...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 23 1994

State of Rajasthan and anr. Vs. Purkha Ram and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-23-1994

Subject : Property

Acts : Rajasthan Colonisation Act, 1954 - Sections 28; Rajasthan Colonisation (Rajasthan Central Project Government Land Allotment and Sale) Rules, 1967 - Rules 8(1) and 23; Rajasthan Colonisation (Allotment and Sale of Government Land in the Rajasthan Canal Colony Area) Rules, 1975 - Rule 4

Reported in : JT1994(4)SC219; 1994(2)SCALE341; 1994Supp(2)SCC169; [1994]2SCR130; 1994(2)LC218(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : B.D. Sharma,; S.K.Bisaria,; G.Prakash and;

ORDER1. Leave granted in Special Leave Petitions.2. These appeals by special leave arise from the judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court of Rajasthan in Civil Special Appeal No. 660 of 1986 and batch...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 19 1996

Jagannath Vs. Yugal NaraIn Purohit, Advocate and Ohters

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-19-1996

Subject : PropertyContract

Reported in : AIR1997SC1914; JT1996(11)SC603; 1997(1)SCALE273; (1997)9SCC90; [1996]Supp10SCR867

Advocate for Appellant : B.D. Sharma, Adv

1. This appeal by special leave arises from the judgment of the division Bench of the Rajasthan High Court, made on November 15,1983 in Special Appeal No. 18/81. The respondent had purchased the property from Bhadarmal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 14 1982

Om Parkash and ors. Vs. the State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-14-1982

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 147

Reported in : 1982CriLJ751; 23(1983)DLT50

Advocate for Appellant : B.D. Sharma and; D.R. Sethi, Advs

Leila Seth, J. (1) This appeal is directed against the judgment and order of the Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi in case No. 69 of 1979 dated 29th January, 1980 convicting the five appellants under Sections 147,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial