Advanced Search Results
Salim Son of Yaseen Vs. First Additional Civil Judge, Senior Division, ...
Allahabad
Jan-17-1996
Family Property
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2(A); Constitution of India - Article 227; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 44, 52 and 53-A; Partition Act, 1893 - Sections 4
AIR1996All342
B.D. Mandhyan, Adv.
ORDER1. Leave is granted on the prayer of Shri B. D. Mandhyan. Learned counsel for the petitioner to correct the cause, title so as to convert the petition into one under Article 227 of the Constitution...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSarad Kumar Srivastava and ors. Vs. High Court of Judicature at Allaha ...
Allahabad
Sep-17-2004
Service
Uttar Pradesh Subordinate Civil Court Ministerial Establishment Rules, 1947 - Rule 14(3)
2005(1)AWC246
Ravi Kant, ;B.D. Mandhyan, ;R.S. Misra, ;M.K. Pandey, ;Arun Kumar, ;Satish Mandhyan and ;L.R. Khan, Advs.
Sunil Ambwani, J.1. Heard Sri Ravi Kant senior counsel assisted by Manoj Kumar Pandey, Sri R.S. Misra, assisted by Sri Arun Kumar, Sri B.D. Mandhyan, senior advocate, assisted by Sri Satish Mandhyan, and Sri L.R. Khan...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKrishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti and anr. Vs. Mahan Proteins Ltd.
Allahabad
Nov-26-1998
Civil
Uttar Pradesh Krishi Utpadan Mandi Adhiniyam, 1964 - Sections 17; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Uttar Pradesh Krishi Utpadan Mandi (Amendment) Act, 1987
(1999)1UPLBEC490
B.D. Mandhyan, Adv.
D.P. Mohapatra, C.J.1. The short question that arises for determination in these cases is whether in the facts and circumstances of the case as revealed from the record the trial Court was right in passing the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Giriraj Kapoor Son of Late Sri N.C. Kapoor and Vs. Government of India ...
Allahabad
Mar-08-2006
Property
Evidence Act - Sections 35 and 114; Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 280; Cantonment Land Administration Rules, 1925 - Rules 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8
2006(3)AWC2287
B.D. Mandhyan and ; Satish Mandhyan, Advs.
B.S. Chauhan, J.1. This petition has been filed for quashing the notices dated 14.12.2001 and 05.02.2001 and the Order No. 179 dated 12.09.1836 of Governor General-in-Council.2. The notice dated 14th December, 2001 has been issued by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKrishi Uptadan Mandi Samiti, Bareilly Vs. Vith Additional District Jud ...
Allahabad
Nov-23-1989
Other Taxes
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 17 - Order 39, Rules 1, 2, 71 and 76(12); Constitution of India - 226; Uttar Pradesh Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti Adhiniyam, 1964 - Sections 9; Bengal Municipal Act, 1932 - Sections 123 and 124; Bengal Municipal (Amendment) Act, 1980;
AIR1990All136; (1990)1UPLBEC262
B.D. Mandhyan, Adv.
ORDER1. Petitioner, Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti, Bareilly has preferred this writ petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India for issuing a writ of certiorari for quashing the orders dated 4-7-87 and 14-8-87 passed by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGulshan Kumar Vs. the Collector, Ghaziabad and Others
Allahabad
Oct-13-1993
Civil
Oaths Act, 1969 - Sections 8; Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 - Rule 17; Procedure of High Court Act, 1869 - Sections 3 and 4; Constitution of India - Article 226; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 191 and 193; Uttar Pradesh Public Moneys (Recovery of Dues) Act, 1972 ; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 409; Indian Oaths Act, 1872
AIR1994All243
B.D. Mandhyan and ;Smt. P.I. Sawhney, Advs.
ORDERRavi S. Dhavan, J.1. By this petition, and the facts averred in it, the Court was led to pass an ad interim order on 21 September, 1993, as the petitioner had contended that therecovery certificate, issued...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKishan Lal Vs. Radhey Shyam and ors.
Allahabad
Feb-14-2002
PropertyCivil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100
2002(2)AWC980
B.D. Mandhyan, ;S.C. Mandhyan and ;Satish Mandhyan, Advs.
B.K. Rathi, J. 1. The appellant filed a suit for injunction forrestraining the respondents from dispossessing him from the disputed premises otherwise than by due process of law. The premises in dispute is first floor portion...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVipIn Krishna Garg and anr. Vs. Shyam Lal Garg and anr.
Allahabad
Mar-12-2004
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100; Indian Easements Act, 1882 - Sections 15 and 18
AIR2004All386; 2004(2)AWC1865b
B.D. Mandhyan, ;S.C. Mandhyan and ;Kumar Anis, Advs.
Tarun Agarwala, J.1. The plaintiff filed a suit for a permanent injunction restraining the defendant from placing any obstruction in the right of passage on the land in dispute and to remove the obstruction on the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSunil Khan and Another Vs. Anupam Housing (P.) Ltd. and Others
Allahabad
May-19-2000
CivilContract
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 1, Rules 3, 10 and 10 (2); Constitution of India - Article 228; Tenancy Act - Sections 59
2000(3)AWC2290
B. D. Mandhyan, Adv.
P. K. Jain, J. 1. This revision is directed against the judgment and order dated 16.7.1998, passed by the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Agra in Suit No. 306 of 1998 whereby the application of the revisionist...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSichai Mazdoor Sangh Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Allahabad
Dec-11-1995
Labour and Industrial
(1996)IIILLJ805All; (1996)1UPLBEC9
B.D. Mandhyan, Adv.
B.S. Chauhan, J.1. The instant writ petition has been filed by Sichai Mazdoor Sangh, a registered union, on behalf of its 29 members, i.e., part-time Tube-well operators of district Aligarh. Itraises various issues and several reliefs...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »