Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: b d kashyap · Page 1 of about 5 results (0.072 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 27 1959

Bhura Mal Dan Dayal Vs. Imperial Flour Mills Ltd. and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-27-1959

Subject : Civil

Acts : Court-fees Act, 1870 - Sections 1, 5, 13 and 30; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 7, Rule 10

Reported in : AIR1959P& H629

Advocate for Appellant : H.R. Sodhi, Adv. and; Prithivi Raj, Adv. for; H.R. Sodhi

I.D. Dua, J. 1. The plaintiff originally instituted the suit in the Civil Court at Delhi but it was held that Delhi Court had no jurisdiction with the result that the plaint was returned for being...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 14 1956

Balak Ram Vs. Surat Ram and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-14-1956

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 23, Rule 3; ;Easements Act, 1882 - Sections 52 and 62; ;Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 5 and 10

Advocate for Appellant : B.D. Kashyap, Adv.

Ramabhadran, J.C. (1) In this second appeal by Balak Ram, defendant No. 3, his learned counsel urged that the Courts below have erred in enforcing the terms of the compromise entered into by Kashi Ram and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 14 1955

Mohan Singh Vs. Deota Ji Bharmol

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-14-1955

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Himachal Pradesh (Courts) Order, 1948; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9, 110 and 115 - Order 13, Rule 3; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 91

Reported in : AIR1956HP22

Advocate for Appellant : B.D. Kashyap, Adv.

Ramabhadran, J.C. 1. This second appeal by a defendant arises out of a suit for possession of land and rnesne profits. The trial Court (Subordinate Judge of Theog) granted a decree for possession as well as...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 09 1952

Dr. Jagat Ram Sud Vs. the State of Himachal Pradesh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-09-1952

Subject : Property

Acts : East Punjab Requisitioning of Immovable Property (Temporary Powers) Act, 1948 - Section 5(1); ;East Punjab Requisitioning of Immovable Property (Temporary Powers) (Amendment) Act, 1951; ;Constitution of India - Article 31(2); ;Punjab Requisitioning of Immovable Property (Amendment and Validation) Act, 1951 - Sections 2(1), 3 and 6; ;Punjab Rent Restriction Act, 1949; ;Contract Act, 1872 - Section 73; ;Land Acquisition Act

Reported in : AIR1953HP5

Advocate for Appellant : B.D. Kashyap, Adv.

Chowdhry, J.C. 1. This is an appeal by one Dr. Jagat Ram Sud, hereinafter referred to as the claimant, under Section 5(1)(f) of the East Punjab Requisitioning of Immovable Property (Temporary Powers) Act (XLVIII of 1948).2....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 24 1961

Thungabhadra Industries Ltd., Kurnool Vs. S.M. Balasundaram,

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-24-1961

Subject : Civil

Acts : Andhra Court-fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1956 - Sections 7, 68, 69, 76, 77 and 79; Court Fees Act, 1870; Suits Valuation Act, 1887; Madras Court Fees (Amendment) Act

Reported in : AIR1962AP65

Advocate for Appellant : M.S. Reddy, Adv. for Ram Rao and Reddy

ORDER(1) These revision petitions raise an interesting question. The City Civil Court, Madras, returned two plaints for presentation to the proper court under Order 7, Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The plaints were...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial