Advanced Search Results
Vijendra Pal Singh Vs. Senior Regional Manager, F.C.i. and anr.
Allahabad
Apr-03-2002
Civil
Uttar Pradesh High Court (Amalgamation) Order, 1948
2002(3)AWC1884
P.K. Srivastava, ;Y.D. Sharma and ;B.C. Saksena, Advs.
M. Katju and Rakesh Tiwari, JJ.1. Sri Satya Prakash has accepted notice on behalf of the Food Corporation of India and may file counter-affidavit within four weeks. List thereafter.2. A perusal of the record of this...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSaroj Kumar Vs. Commissioner, Lucknow Division and ors.
Allahabad
Aug-29-2003
Service
2004(2)AWC1007
B.C. Saksena, ;P.K. Srivastava, ;A. Mathur and ;S. Bhatnagar, Advs.
Jagdish Bhalla, J.1. This writ petition is directed against the judgment dated 21.2.1983 passed by the U. P. Public Services Tribunal by which claim petition of the petitioner against the order of dismissal has been rejected...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKhuda Bux and ors. Vs. State
Allahabad
Mar-14-1951
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 35, 100, 439 and 552; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 96, 99, 147, 225B, 332, 342 and 379
AIR1951All637
B.C. Saksena, Adv.
Desai, J.1. This is an appln, in revn. against the appcts'. convictions Under Sections 332, 147, 379 & 225B, I. P. C, by the Addl. Ses. J. of Bareilly. In all 28 men were convicted by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Bankey Vs. State
Allahabad
May-18-1960
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 376, 509, 511; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 238
AIR1961All131; 1961CriLJ330
B.C. Saksena, Adv.
V.D. Bhargava, J. 1. Bankey has filed this appeal against his conviction under Section 376 read with Section 511, I. P. C 2. According to the prosecution there was one Chunni resident of Mauza Basoma, police...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState Vs. Smt. Rampo and ors.
Allahabad
Mar-31-1960
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 344, 423 and 435
AIR1960All636; 1960CriLJ1301
Asst. Govt. Adv. and ;B.C. Saksena, Adv.
ORDERM.C. Desai, J.1. This is an application by the State for revision of an order passed by an Assistant Sessions Judge on 16-4-1959 adjourning the hearing of a criminal appeal filed by the opposite parties against...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNishatganj Vyapar Mandal Vs. State of U.P. and Others
Allahabad
May-18-1993
Civil
Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 21 and 226; Indian Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 16 to 19; Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 20 and 21; Andhra Pradesh Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Dacoits, Drug Offendrs, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders and Land Grabbers Act, 1986 - Sections 2(3)
AIR1994All84
P.K. Mehrotra and ;H.S. Jain, Advs.
ORDERB.C. Saksena, J.1. Counter affidavit on behalf of opposite parties except opposite party No. 6 Nagar Mahapalika, Lucknow have been filed. Rejoinder affidavits have also been filed. As pleadings were complete, with the consent of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAvdhesh Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Allahabad
Apr-05-1993
Labour and Industrial
Constitution of India - Article 14
(1998)IIILLJ550All
ORDERB.C. Saksena, J.1. By means of this writ petition the petitioner has inter alia prayed for following reliefs :(a) A writ of mandamus, commanding the opposite parties to allow him to work on the post of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSarajuddIn Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Allahabad
May-15-1993
Labour and Industrial
Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 6
(1994)IILLJ228All
L.P. Mishra, Adv.
ORDERB.C. Saksena, J.1. In view of the order passed by Hon'ble the Supreme Court dated March 15, 1993 in Special Leave Petition (C) No. 13788 of 1992, Senior Judge of this Court directed that this case...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›