Advanced Search Results
Narang Hotels and Resorts Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.
Mumbai
Oct-09-2003
Sales TaxCustoms
Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 5 and 5(1); Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959; Constitution of India - Article 286 and 286(1); Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 2(12), 2(13) and 7; Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 23(1) and 23(2)
[2004]135STC289(Bom)
Kapil Sibal, Adv. and ;Aspi Chinoi, Senior Counsel, ;B.C. Joshi, Senior Adv., ;Akhil Sibal, Adv. and ;D.G. Jhangiani, Adv., i/b., Jhangiani, Narula and Associates
V.C. Daga, J. 1. This petition raises an interesting but intricate question as to whether sale of eatables or goods to foreign airlines for consumption on board during the period such aircraft is a foreign going...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNiranjan Mills Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Feb-03-1995
Sales Tax
Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Sections 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 19, 22, 33(2) and (6), 36(2), 37(1), (2) and (3), 38, 38(6), 46, 48 and 61(1)
1996(1)BomCR259
B.C. Joshi and ;Ms. Badhekar, Advs.
Dr. B.P. Saraf, J. 1. By this reference under section 61(1) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, made at the instance of the assessee, the Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal has referred the following question of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVersova Koli Sahakari Vahatuk Sangh Ltd. Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Jan-12-1968
Sales Tax
Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Sections 2, 2(11), 2(19), 2(28), 3, 61 and 61(5)
[1968]22STC116(Bom)
B.C. Joshi and ;V.P. Vyas, Advs.
Vimadalal, J. 1. This is a reference under section 61 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, whereby two questions have been submitted to this Court for its decision. 2. The facts necessary for the purpose...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Rita Kishore and ors Vs. Delhi Development Authority
Delhi
Aug-12-2011
Land Acquisition
Ms. Jyoti Singh; Mr. J.L.Grover; Ms. Puja Anand, Advs.
1. This is a suit for recovery of Rs.42 lakh as damages and compensation. Late Sh. Giri Raj Kishore, husband of plaintiff No.1 and father of plaintiffs No.2 and 3, was an employee of defendant DDA,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askishwarlal Sarabhai Parikh Vs. Prabhawati Ishwarlal Parikh (Smt.) and a ...
Mumbai
Nov-27-1987
Family
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 13(1)
1988(1)BomCR464
Hemendra Shah, ; C.G. Gavnekar and ; K.H. Panchal, Advs.
S.N. Khatri, J.1. This judgment disposes of L.P.A. Nos. 14 and 15 of 1983. Ishwarlal Parikh is the common appellant. Prabha who is the first respondent in both appeals is his wife. The husband has filed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Sales Tax Vs. Saravagi Industries
Mumbai
Nov-26-1984
Sales Tax
Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Sections 2(26) and 61(1)
(1985)87BOMLR15; 1985MhLJ116; [1985]59STC259(Bom)
Smt. Sujata V. Manohar, J.1. Respondents M/s. Saravagi Industries are manufacturers of laminated labels. For the manufacturer of laminated labels the assessee (respondents) had purchased iron and steel scrap sheets. Out of the sheets so purchased...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRita Kishor and ors. Vs. Delhi Development Authority
Delhi
Sep-01-2000
ServiceCivil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151
AIR2000Delhi417
Mr. R.P. Bansal, Sr. Adv. and; Mr. Sharad K.Aggarwal, Adv
ORDERMukul Mudgal, J.1. This is an application on behalf of the plaintiff under Section 151 of the Civil Procedure Code seeking interim reliefs from the defendant-DDA. 2. The plaintiffs have filed the suit for compensation and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Sales Tax Vs. P. Ambalal and Co.
Mumbai
Mar-18-1977
Direct Taxation
Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1953 - Sections 15
(1977)6CTR(Bom)382
R.J. Joshi, Adv.
Madon, J. 1. In this Reference under S. 34(1) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1953, the following two questions have been referred to us at the instance of the Applicant :- '(1) Whether, on the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Sales Tax, Maharashtra State, Bombay Vs. L. D. Bhave a ...
Mumbai
Feb-13-1981
Sales Tax
[1981]47STC318(Bom)
Sujata V. Manohar, J.1. The respondents are dealers in Burshane gas. They also deal in gas stoves which are referred to in the record before us as hot plates, rubber tubes, metal rings which can he...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS.N.Bhatnagar Vs. the Secretary and anr.
Delhi
Nov-27-2013
Land Acquisition
Mr. K.N.Balgopal, Mr. A.P.Mukundam, Mr. T.A.Prakash
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C) No.3394/2000 27th November, 2013 S.N.BHATNAGAR Through: ......Petitioner Mr. K.N.Balgopal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. A.P.Mukundam and Mr. T.A.Prakash, Advocates. VERSUS THE SECRETARY AND ANR....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »