Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: b c joshi and · Page 1 of about 43 results (0.122 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 09 2003

Narang Hotels and Resorts Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-09-2003

Subject : Sales TaxCustoms

Acts : Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 5 and 5(1); Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959; Constitution of India - Article 286 and 286(1); Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 2(12), 2(13) and 7; Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 23(1) and 23(2)

Reported in : [2004]135STC289(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Kapil Sibal, Adv. and ;Aspi Chinoi, Senior Counsel, ;B.C. Joshi, Senior Adv., ;Akhil Sibal, Adv. and ;D.G. Jhangiani, Adv., i/b., Jhangiani, Narula and Associates

V.C. Daga, J. 1. This petition raises an interesting but intricate question as to whether sale of eatables or goods to foreign airlines for consumption on board during the period such aircraft is a foreign going...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 03 1995

Niranjan Mills Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-03-1995

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Sections 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 19, 22, 33(2) and (6), 36(2), 37(1), (2) and (3), 38, 38(6), 46, 48 and 61(1)

Reported in : 1996(1)BomCR259

Advocate for Appellant : B.C. Joshi and ;Ms. Badhekar, Advs.

Dr. B.P. Saraf, J. 1. By this reference under section 61(1) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, made at the instance of the assessee, the Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal has referred the following question of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 12 1968

Versova Koli Sahakari Vahatuk Sangh Ltd. Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-12-1968

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Sections 2, 2(11), 2(19), 2(28), 3, 61 and 61(5)

Reported in : [1968]22STC116(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : B.C. Joshi and ;V.P. Vyas, Advs.

Vimadalal, J. 1. This is a reference under section 61 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, whereby two questions have been submitted to this Court for its decision. 2. The facts necessary for the purpose...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 12 2011

Rita Kishore and ors Vs. Delhi Development Authority

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-12-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Ms. Jyoti Singh; Mr. J.L.Grover; Ms. Puja Anand, Advs.

1. This is a suit for recovery of Rs.42 lakh as damages and compensation. Late Sh. Giri Raj Kishore, husband of plaintiff No.1 and father of plaintiffs No.2 and 3, was an employee of defendant DDA,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 27 1987

ishwarlal Sarabhai Parikh Vs. Prabhawati Ishwarlal Parikh (Smt.) and a ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-27-1987

Subject : Family

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 13(1)

Reported in : 1988(1)BomCR464

Advocate for Appellant : Hemendra Shah, ; C.G. Gavnekar and ; K.H. Panchal, Advs.

S.N. Khatri, J.1. This judgment disposes of L.P.A. Nos. 14 and 15 of 1983. Ishwarlal Parikh is the common appellant. Prabha who is the first respondent in both appeals is his wife. The husband has filed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 26 1984

Commissioner of Sales Tax Vs. Saravagi Industries

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-26-1984

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Sections 2(26) and 61(1)

Reported in : (1985)87BOMLR15; 1985MhLJ116; [1985]59STC259(Bom)

Smt. Sujata V. Manohar, J.1. Respondents M/s. Saravagi Industries are manufacturers of laminated labels. For the manufacturer of laminated labels the assessee (respondents) had purchased iron and steel scrap sheets. Out of the sheets so purchased...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 01 2000

Rita Kishor and ors. Vs. Delhi Development Authority

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-01-2000

Subject : ServiceCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151

Reported in : AIR2000Delhi417

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. R.P. Bansal, Sr. Adv. and; Mr. Sharad K.Aggarwal, Adv

ORDERMukul Mudgal, J.1. This is an application on behalf of the plaintiff under Section 151 of the Civil Procedure Code seeking interim reliefs from the defendant-DDA. 2. The plaintiffs have filed the suit for compensation and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 18 1977

Commissioner of Sales Tax Vs. P. Ambalal and Co.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-18-1977

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1953 - Sections 15

Reported in : (1977)6CTR(Bom)382

Advocate for Appellant : R.J. Joshi, Adv.

Madon, J. 1. In this Reference under S. 34(1) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1953, the following two questions have been referred to us at the instance of the Applicant :- '(1) Whether, on the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 13 1981

Commissioner of Sales Tax, Maharashtra State, Bombay Vs. L. D. Bhave a ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-13-1981

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : [1981]47STC318(Bom)

Sujata V. Manohar, J.1. The respondents are dealers in Burshane gas. They also deal in gas stoves which are referred to in the record before us as hot plates, rubber tubes, metal rings which can he...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 27 2013

S.N.Bhatnagar Vs. the Secretary and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-27-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. K.N.Balgopal, Mr. A.P.Mukundam, Mr. T.A.Prakash

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C) No.3394/2000 27th November, 2013 S.N.BHATNAGAR Through: ......Petitioner Mr. K.N.Balgopal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. A.P.Mukundam and Mr. T.A.Prakash, Advocates. VERSUS THE SECRETARY AND ANR....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial