Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: b b ratho · Page 1 of about 68 results (0.050 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 11 1998

Jagamohan Higher Secondary School and ors. Vs. State of Orissa and ors ...

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Mar-11-1998

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1998Ori136

Advocate for Appellant : B.B. Ratho, ;B.N. Ratho, ;B. Senapati, ;J.N. Rath, ;S.K. Jathi, ;M.K. Panda, ;P.K. Panda, ;P.K. Samantara, ;S.K. Patjoshi and ;S.B. Mohanty

ORDER1. This batch of writ application filed on behalf of different Higher Secondary Schools and + 2 Colleges through their respective Secretaries is directed against the decision of the Council of Higher Secondary Education, Orissa, Bhubaneswar...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 02 1999

Rama Chandra Khuntia Vs. Ashok Kumar Das and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Apr-02-1999

Subject : Election

Acts : Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 81(1), 100 and 101; Conduct of Election Rules 1961 - Rule 63

Reported in : 88(1999)CLT136

Advocate for Appellant : B.B. Ratho, ;B.N. Ratho, ;G.N. Mohapatra and ;P.K. Sahoo, Advs.

ORDERP.K. Misra, J.1. The petitioner has filed this application under the Representation of the People Act (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') for declaring the election of respondent No. 1 as void and for inspection and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 26 1991

Harekrishna Das Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Apr-26-1991

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Major Port Trust Act, 1963 - Sections 123 and 125; Paradip Port Employees (Classification, Control and Appeal) Regulations, 1967 - Regulation 10

Reported in : (1993)ILLJ20Ori

Advocate for Appellant : B.B. Ratho and ;B. Senapati, Advs.

L. Rath, J.1. The petitioner who was an Overseer (Electrical) under the Paradip Port Trust having been dismissed from service and his departmental appeal against the dismissal having failed, has come before this Court seeking redress....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 12 2000

Manorama Mohapatra (Smt.) and ors. Vs. Collector and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : May-12-2000

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act

Reported in : 90(2000)CLT206; (2000)IILLJ1023Ori; 2000(I)OLR662

Advocate for Appellant : B.B. Ratho, Adv.

R.K. Patra, J.1. This is a writ petition registered on the basis of a fax message which was received by the Hon'ble the Chief Justice on May 4, 2000. There are six signatories to the said...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 21 1987

Digambar SwaIn Vs. the Presiding Officer, Labour Court and anr.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Dec-21-1987

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Sections 10(1)

Reported in : 65(1988)CLT547; (1994)IIILLJ219Ori

Advocate for Appellant : B.B. Ratho and ;S.K. Das, ;R.N. Acharya and ;P.K. Bhuyan, Advs.

R.C. Patnaik, J.1. This writ application by the workman-petitioner is directed against a decision dated 1.5.1980 of the Presiding Officer, Labour Court, in Industrial Disputes Case No. 137 of 1979 holding the termination of service of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 21 1985

Smt. Arda Mahalaxmi and anr. Vs. District Magistrate and Collector, Ga ...

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Mar-21-1985

Subject : Property

Acts : Orissa Land Reforms Act, 1960 - Sections 45 and 51; ;Constitution of India - Article 300A; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 144

Reported in : AIR1986Ori20

Advocate for Appellant : B.B. Ratho, Adv.

S.C. Mohapatra, J.1. This is a second round of the petitioners to approach this Court in an application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.2. Petitioners, who are mother and son, are landholders....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 28 1991

Sri Sambhu Panigrahi Vs. Sri Parsuram Panda

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Oct-28-1991

Subject : Election

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 173; Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 30 to 36

Reported in : AIR1992Ori115; 73(1992)CLT387

Advocate for Appellant : B.B. Ratho, ;B. Rath, ;B. Senapati, ;S.N. Mohapatra, ;S. Ghosh and ;J.N. Rath

D.P. Mohapatra, J. 1. Shri Sambhu Panigrahi, who filed his nomination to contest for election to the State Legislative Assembly from 72-Chatrapur constituency held in 1990, filed this application under Ss.80A, 81, 84, 87, 98, 99,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 08 1997

Saroj Kumar Mishra Vs. Board of Directors of Orissa State Financial Co ...

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Apr-08-1997

Subject : Service

Acts : Orissa State Financial Corporation Staff Regulations, 1975 - Regulation 44; Orissa Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1962 - Rule 13

Reported in : 1997(I)OLR537

Advocate for Appellant : B.B. Ratho, Manoj Mishra, U.C. Patnaik, P.K. Das, B. Mishra, D. Sarangi and S.K. Pradhan

R. K. Patra, J. 1. Is stoppage of increments with cumulative effect a major penalty This is the prime question that arises for consideration in this application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 04 1984

Pati Digal Vs. Bandu Malik and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Jul-04-1984

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Orissa Scheduled Areas Transfer of Immovable Property (by Scheduled Tribes) Regulation, 1956 - Sections 3(1) and 7C; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 58(1984)CLT107; 1984(II)OLR633

Advocate for Appellant : B.B. Ratho and S.K. Das

S.C. Mohapatra, J.1. Budrukia is a village in Balliguda Police-Station. Both petitioner (hereinafter referred to as the transferee) and opposite party No. 1 (hereinafter referred to as the transferor) belong to that village. Opposite party No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 20 1989

Smt. Kamala Panda Vs. Krishna Cloth Stores and anr.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Mar-20-1989

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 144 and 151 - Order 5, Rule 19A and 19A(2) - Order 38, Rules 5, 5(1), 5(3), 5(4) and 6

Reported in : AIR1989Ori229; 67(1989)CLT679

Advocate for Appellant : B.B. Ratho, Sr. Adv., ;B.N. Rath and ;K.B. Panda, Advs.

ORDERL. Rath, J.1. The petitioner, defendant 2 in M.S. No. 56/87 filed by the opposite party 1, having failed in her attempt to get an order passed under Order 38, Rule 5 C.P.C. against her recalled,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial