Advanced Search Results
State Bank of India Vs. Gobbs Kay India and ors.
Delhi
Jul-09-1998
Limitation
Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5
1998IVAD(Delhi)499; 74(1998)DLT133; 1998(46)DRJ291; (1998)120PLR36
Mr. Rajiv Kapur, Adv
D.K. Jain, J.1. This order will dispose of is No.297, 2628 and 2629/96, all filed by the plaintiff. is No.297/96 is under Order XXII Rule 4, CPC for bringing on record the legal representatives of deceased...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState Bank of India and Etc. Vs. Vijay Kr. Tayal and Others, Etc.
Delhi
Jul-12-1996
Banking
Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 - Sections 17, 19 and 31; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 13(1)
AIR1997Delhi170; 64(1996)DLT264; 1996(39)DRJ73; (1997)115PLR25
Ishwar Sahai, Sr. Adv. and; Sanjeev Kakra and; Atul Kumar
ORDER1. By this common order, I would be deciding the question of transfer of suits instituted by Banks and Financial Institutions to the Debt Recovery Tribunal, constituted under 'the Recovery of Debts due to Banks and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState Bank of India Vs. Vijay Kumar Tayal and Others
Delhi
Mar-12-1996
Company
[1997]89CompCas424(Delhi)
Ishwar Sahai, Senior Adv.,; Sanjeev Kakra,; Atul Kumar
Manmohan Sarin J. 1. By this common order, I would be deciding the question of transfer of suits instituted by banks and financial institutions to the Debt Recovery Tribunal, constituted under 'the Recovery of Debts Due...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Mohd. Usman and anr. Vs. Abdul Ghani
Delhi
Oct-05-1987
Tenancy
Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14 and 39; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 41, Rule 27
1987(2)ARBLR152(Delhi); 35(1988)DLT10
Atul Kumar and; Mela Ram, Advs
Yogeshwar Dayal, C.J.(1) This is an appeal by a tenant against the concurrent findings of the learned Rent Control Tribunal Delhi passing order ejectment of the appellants from the premises in dispute under clause (d) of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGyan Devi Saxena Vs. Mohinder Singh
Delhi
Dec-20-1996
PropertyContract
Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 16; Evidence Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 8, Rule 1(6) - Order 26, Rule 9 - Order 32, Rule 2; Indian Lunancy Act, 1912 - Sections 18 and 19
1997IAD(Delhi)617; 65(1997)DLT764; 1997(40)DRJ538
Atul Kumar, Adv
K. Ramamoorthy, J. (1) The Plaintiff No.1 Mrs. Gian Devi wife of K.S. Saxena and plaintiff No.2 Smt. Bimal Saxena wife of Shri Mohan Saxena who is the daughter of plaintiff No.1 have filed the above...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHari Singh Vs. Padmawati Arts Creation Pvt. Ltd. and ors
Rajasthan Jodhpur
Jul-31-2014
Education
-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. JUDGMENT DB Civil Special Appeal No.486/2013 In SB Civil Writ Petition No.7363/2010 Hari Singh v. Padmawati Arts Creation PVT.LTD.& ORS.Date of Judgment :: 31st July,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Raj. State Mines and Minerals Ltd Vs. State and ors
Rajasthan Jodhpur
Jun-30-2014
Land Acquisition
-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. ORDER DB Civil Misc. Review Petition No.120/2013 In DB Civil Writ Petition No.1852/2002 The Rajasthan State Mines & Minerals Ltd.v.State of Rajasthan & Anr. Date...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPrabhu Narayan Vs. A.K. Srivastava
Supreme Court of India
Feb-14-1975
Media and CommunicationElection
Conduct of Elections Rules - Rule 94A; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 122 - Order 6, Rule 15 and 15(2) - Order 19, Rule 2; Representation of Public Act, 1951 - Sections 83(1) and 123(4)
AIR1975SC968; (1975)3SCC788; [1975]3SCR552
Y.S. Dharamdhikar and; T.P.Naik, Advs
1. In the election held on 11th March, 1972 to the Legislative Assembly of Madhya Pradesh from Damoh constituency the respondent, an independent candidate, was declared elected. The appellant, the Congress candidate filed an election petition...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAjay Iron and Steel Works, Varanasi and Another Vs. Union of India and ...
Allahabad
Nov-18-1998
Commercial
Indian Telegraph Rules - Rule 443; Partnership Act, 1930 - Sections 25
1998(4)AWC314
V.K. Shukla and ;Atul Kumar Pandey, Advs.
M. Katju and S.L. Saraf, JJ.1. Heard Sri V. K. Shukla and Sri Atul Kumar Pandey for the etitioners and Sri Mohd. Isha Khan for the respondents,2. The petitioners have prayed for quashing of the notice...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLiladhar Ramsukh Das Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Allahabad
Jul-18-1994
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 37 and 256
[1995]211ITR441(All)
V. Gulati, Adv.
A.P. Misra, J. 1. The assessee-applicant seeks reference of the following questions of law under Section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 : ' 1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »