Advanced Search Results

Upendra Kumar Kaliya Vs. South Eastern Coal Fields Limited

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Satish Shrivastava, Mr. D.K. Dixit, Mr. Vikas Mishra, Mr. Shailendra Verma, Mr. P.S. Tomar, Mr. Sunil Singh Sengar, Mr. Gajendra Tamsikar, Mr. V.K. Shukla, Mr. Pushpendra Yadav, Mr. Manot Chandurkar, Mr. Jitendra Tiwari, Mr. G.S. Gaharwar

Review Petition No.986/2012 01.03.2013 Mr. Satish Shrivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. K.B. Bhatnagar, learned counsel for the respondents. Heard on I.A. No.14613/2012, an application for condonation of delay. For the reasons assigned in the...

Ramesh Charmkar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

Writ Petition No.1857/2013 08.02.2013 Mr.Atul Choudhari, learned counsel for the petitioner. MRS.Sharada Dubey, learned Panel Lawyer for the respondents. Heard. In this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the validity of order dated 04.01.2013, by which...

Vijay Kumar Kashyap Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Atul Choudhary

v.k.kashyap versus State W.P.No.18346/2012 5-11-2012 Shri Atul Choudhary, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Sanjeev Kumar Singh, learned Panel Lawyer for the respondents. Petitioner is working as a Principal in the Industrial Training Institute at Betul....

D.K. Gupta Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

Writ Petition No :21423. 2012 D.K.Gupta versus State of Madhya Pradesh & ORS.19.12.2012. Shri Atul Choudhari for the petitioner. Shri Sanjeev Kumar Singh, Panel Lawyer, for the State, on advance notice. Considering the fact that departmental...

All India Punjab National Bank Officers' Association and Ors. Vs. Chai ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : BankingDirect Taxation

Reported in : (2010)229CTR(MP)257

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. S.K. Pathak

ORDERDipak Misra, J.1. Regard being had to the similarity of the controversy involved in this batch of writ petitions, they were heard analogously and are disposed of by a singular order. For the sake of clarity...

M/S Rajneesh and Company Sawarkasr Ward Nai Basti Katni Vs. Union of I ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Arbitration

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. S. Rao

1 M/s Rajnish versus Union of India R.P.No.411/2012 16/8/2012: Shri V.R.Rao, learned Senior Counsel with Shri S. Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Atul Choudhari, learned counsel for the respondents. This application has been filed...

Union of India Vs. Rajendra Prasad Yadav

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADEESH JABALPUR (Writ Petition No.7135/2008) Union of India and others Vs. Rajendra Prasad Yadav & others PRESENT : HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT SINGH HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY YADAV Counsel for petitioners Shri...

M/S Swagatika Impex Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Uco Bank

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Right to Information

1 W.P. No. 12623/2007 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADEESH JABALPUR (Writ Petition No.12623/2007) M/s. Swagatika Impex Pvt. Ltd. Vs. UCO Bank and others ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ PRESENT : HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY YADAV ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ Counsel for Petitioner Shri...

Union of India Vs. M/S Maihar Cement

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

1....W.A.No.661 o”18. 7.2012 Shri N.S.Ruprah with Shri Atul Choudhary, Counsels for the appellants. Shri Aditya Adhikari, Counsel for the respondents. I.A.7603/12 for dispensing with the requirement of filing certified copy of the impugned order. It is...

M/S Tripathi Construction Co. Vs. the Union of India and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Arbitration

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Sanjay Kumar Patel

Civil Revision No.2475 o”13. 08.2013 Shri Shekhar Sharma and Shri Sanjay Kumar Patel, learned counsel for the applicant. Shri Atul Choudhary, learned counsel for respondents. In compliance of the earlier order this case is listed today...