Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: assistant adv general · Page 1 of about 27 results (0.157 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 31 1956

State Vs. Yash Pal P.S.i.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-31-1956

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act - 1947 - Sections 6; Constitution of India - Articles 245, 246 and 372

Reported in : AIR1957P& H91; 1957CriLJ540

Advocate for Appellant : Kartar Singh Chawla, Assistant Adv. General

Kapur, J.1. This is a rule which I issued on the 14th June 1956 at the instance of the State against an order made by Special Jude I. M. Lal on the 21st April 1956.2. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 20 2001

Haryana State Vs. Krishan Kumar

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-20-2001

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 166

Reported in : 2003ACJ549

Advocate for Appellant : Sultan Singh, Assistant Adv. General

R.C. Kathuria, J. 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 15.5.1985 of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Hissar, whereby the claim of Krishan Kumar-respondent No. 1 was accepted and he was awarded compensation amounting...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 24 1997

State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Sher Khan

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-24-1997

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 13, 13(2), 16(1) and 20; ;General Clauses Act, 1897 - Section 27; ;Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules - Rule 9A; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 251 and 313

Reported in : 1998CriLJ563

Advocate for Appellant : M.L. Chauhan, Assistant Adv. General

ORDERArun Kumar Goel, J. 1. I have heard the learned Assistant Advocate General and have also gone through the record of the case.2. The State is aggrieved by the acquittal of the respondent ordered by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 20 1996

State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Ram Sarup and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-20-1996

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 324, 325 and 506; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 313

Reported in : 1997CriLJ588

Advocate for Appellant : M.L. Chauhan, Assistant Adv. General

Arun Kumar Goel, J. 1. This appeal has been filed at the instance of the State against the judgment dated 24-3-1990 passed by Shri J. L. Gupta, Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nahan, District Sirmour in Criminal Case...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 05 1996

State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Yog Raj

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-05-1996

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act - Section 113B; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 304B, 306 and 498A; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313 and 378

Reported in : 1997CriLJ2033

Advocate for Appellant : A.K. Chaudhary, Assistant Adv. General

R.L. Khurana, J.1. Respondent Yog Raj was tried for the offences under Sections 304-B, 306, 498-A, Indian Penal Code before the Sessions Judge, Mandi, Kullu and Lauhal-Spiti Districts at Mandi in Sessions Trial No. 24 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 09 1996

State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Kartar Singh and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-09-1996

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 307, 498A and 506; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 320, 320(1), 320(2) 320(8) and 320(9); ;Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Section 13B and 23(2); ;Hindu Marriage (Amendment) Act, 1976

Reported in : 1997CriLJ2321

Advocate for Appellant : Indar Singh, Adv. General and; M.L. Chauhan, Assistant Adv. General

ORDERArun Kumar Goel, J.1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and with their assistance, I have also gone through the records of this case.2. In order to properly appreciate the case, it is necessary to state...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 03 1994

State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Shiv Nath

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-03-1994

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 30, 31 and 33; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Section 251

Reported in : 1995CriLJ3472

Advocate for Appellant : R.M. Bisht, Assistant Adv. General

S.N. Phukan, J.1. This is an appeal by the State against the judgment of the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Rohru, District Shimla dated 13-10-1986 in case No. 167/3 of 1984. By the impugned judgment, the learned...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 06 1994

State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Inder Jeet and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-06-1994

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 147, 323, 427, 451 and 506; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Section 313

Reported in : 1996CriLJ1163

Advocate for Appellant : Om Prakash Sharma, Addl. Adv. General and; R.M. Bisht, Assistant Adv. General

S.N. Phukan, J.1. This appeal by the State is directed against the order of acquittal passed by the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sundernagar, District Mandi dated 14-3-1989 in Police Challan case No. 280-I/87.2. Briefly stated, the facts...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 28 1954

State of Mysore Vs. A.C. Hanumanthappa

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-28-1954

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Mysore Sales Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 3, 9, 16 and 16(1)

Reported in : [1955]6STC34(Kar)

Advocate for Appellant : Assistant Adv.-General

ORDER1. This petition has been registered on a reference made under section 16(1) of the Mysore Sales Tax Act of 1948 by the revising authority, the Commissioner of Sales Tax is Mysore. 2. The facts of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 22 1961

The State of Mysore Vs. the Bangalore Woollen, Cotton and Silk Mills, ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-22-1961

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : [1962]13STC106(Kar)

Advocate for Appellant : B. Venkataswamy, Assistant Adv.-General

ORDERHombe Gowda, J.1. These four revision petitions are directed against a common order passed by the Mysore Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal in Cases Nos. S.T.A. 116, S.T.A. 117, S.T.A. 118 and S.T.A. 119 of 1958 and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial