Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: asoke kumar banerjee and · Page 1 of about 13 results (0.045 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 23 1993

Messers Premier Woodcrafts Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Messers Darbari Udyog and Oth ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-23-1993

Subject : TenancyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 11, 21, 21(A), 21(1), 47, 47(1) and 100 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2 - Order 41, Rules 5(1) and 11;; Transfer of Property Act;; West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act;; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Section 144(2)

Reported in : AIR1994Cal141,97CWN1196

Advocate for Appellant : Asok Kumar Banerjee and ;Bijon Majumdar, Advs.

ORDER1. This revisional application is directed against the judgment and order dated 9-9-1991 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Third Court, Barasat in Misc. Appeal No. 148 of 1990, arising out of Order No. 16dated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 20 1995

Punjab and Sind Bank Employees Vs. Indian Banks Association and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-20-1995

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115 and 151 - Order 1, Rules 1, 2 and 10(2) - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; ;Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Section 34

Reported in : (1995)2CALLT138(HC)

Advocate for Appellant : Asok Kumar Banerjee and ;D.K. Dasgupta, Advs.;Mukul Prokash Banerjee and ;Chhabi Chakraborty, Advs.;Bikash Ranjan Bhattacharya and ;Santi Das, Advs.;Sabyasachi Ghosh, Adv.;Maitrayi Ghosh and ;Subhas P

Bijitendra Mohan Mitra, J.1. The present revisional application is directed against order No. 4 dated 3rd February, 1995 passed by the learned Judge, 9th Bench, City Civil Court, Calcutta in T. S. No. 289 of 1995....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 27 2015

Abp Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. Vs. Kolkata Municipal Corporation and Ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-27-2015

Subject : Right to Information

C.C.No.103 of 2014 APO246of 2014 W.P.644 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction (Contempt) Original Side ABP PVT.LTD.& ANR. Versus KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble CHIEF JUSTICE MRS.MANJULA CHELLUR The Hon'ble...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 25 2011

Yashdeep Trexim Vs. Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction ...

Court : Kolkata Appellate

Decided on : Jan-25-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. Ambit and coverage of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions)  Act, 1985 (hereafter the SICA) do not extend to a foreign company carrying on  business in this country, is the point vehemently argued by learned...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 16 2012

Vs. the Kolkata Municipal Corporation and ors. Defendant/Responden

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-16-2012

Subject : Education

ORDER SHEET W.P.No.537 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE TAPAN KUMAR SHAH & ANR. Plaintiff/Petitioner/Applicant Versus THE KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS.Defendant/Respondent For Plaintiff/Petitioner : MR.RUPAK GHOSH,ADVOCATE For KMC...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 30 1981

Brojendra Nath Biswas Vs. the State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jan-30-1981

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Section 144(2); ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : AIR1981Cal220

Advocate for Appellant : Asoke Kumar Banerjee, Adv.

ORDERManas Nath Roy, J. 1. This Rule with the corresponding interim order directing respondents Nos. 2 and 3 viz., Superintendent of Police Alipore and Officer-in-Charge, Canning Police Station respectively, to protect the fishery viz., Moukhali Fishery...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 23 1984

Mst. Fatima Khatoon Vs. Swarup Singh

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-23-1984

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 144 - Order 9, Rule 13

Reported in : AIR1984Cal257,88CWN773

Advocate for Appellant : Asoke Kumar Banerjee and ;Tapas Kumar Das, Advs.

Anil Kumar Sen, J.1. Thus Rule obtained on a revisional application raises a short point as to whether a Court setting aside an ex parte decree under Order 9, Rule 13 of the Civil Procedure Code...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 31 1998

Lalta Prasad Jaiswal and ors. Vs. Kamala Devi Gupta and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-31-1998

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) 1908 - Sections 115 and 151, Order 26, Rules 9 and 10(3) - Order 39, Rule 7

Reported in : (1999)1CALLT33(HC)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Asoke Kumar Banerjee and; Mr. Tarit Baran Roy, Advs.

D.B. Dutta, J.1.The instant revisional application under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure is directed against an order of the trial court allowingthe opposite party's petition in part under Order 26 Rule 9 read...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 19 1997

Calcutta DioceasIn Trust Association (P) and anr. Vs. Mrinal Chowdhury ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-19-1997

Subject : Civil

Acts : Bengal Municipal Act, 1932 - Sections 324 and 333

Reported in : (1997)2CALLT88(HC)

Advocate for Appellant : Asoke Kumar Banerjee, ;Bhuddhadev Ghoshal, ;Achintya Kumar Sen and ;Ashim Mukherjee, Advs.

Samir Kumar Mookherjee, J.1. These two appeals are directed against the same order, passed by a learned single Judge of this court, dated 2nd July, 1992 in C.O. No. 6261 (W) of 1992. The two appeals...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 27 2007

Enkon Private Limited and anr. Vs. Bijoli Studio Private Limited and o ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-27-2007

Subject : Contract

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14 and 226; ;Assam Land and Revenue and Local Rates Regulations - Regulation 37

Reported in : 2008(1)CHN122

Advocate for Appellant : Asoke Kumar Banerjee,; Arunava Ghose,; Susovan Sengupta and; Basudeb Ghose, Advs.

Bhaskar Bhattacharya, J.1. This mandamus appeal is at the instance of the two private respondents in a writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and is directed against the order dated July 31,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial