Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: ashok soni · Page 1 of about 24 results (0.063 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 27 1995

Kishori Devi Vs. State of Bihar and anr.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Sep-27-1995

Subject : Criminal

S.K. Chattopadhyaya, J.1. Two important questions arise in this case; one of which is as to whether in pursuance of a proclamation order under Section 82 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the property of any...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 05 2003

Chunni Lal Baheti Vs. A.D.J. No. 1 and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Mar-05-2003

Subject : Civil

Acts : Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 111; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2003(27)PTC514(Raj); 2004(5)WLC753

Advocate for Appellant : J.P. Joshi, Adv.

N.N. Mathur, J.1. We have heard Mr. J.P. Joshi learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Ashok Soni learned counsel for the respondent cavetor.2. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, we are of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 21 2012

M/S. Shyam Oils Vs. M/S. Jugal Kishore Vanaspati Prod. P.Ltd

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : Aug-21-2012

Subject : Education

S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 4541/2012 (M/s Shyam Oils Vs. M/s Jugal Kishore Vanaspati Product Ltd) Date of Order ::21. 08.2012 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS Dr. Ashok Soni, for the petitioner. Mr. G.D. Bansal,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 25 2013

Sesa Ram Vs. M/S Aasapuri Tea Company

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : Jul-25-2013

Subject : Education

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :JUDGMENT: S.B. CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO.1675/2012 Sesa Ram Vs. M/s Aasapuri Tea Company, Sirohi. Date of Judgment ::25. h July, 2013 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 25 2019

Sunil Duggal & Ors. Vs.state

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-25-2019

Subject : Criminal

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :19. 12.2018 Date of Decision :25. 02.2019 + CRL.A. 146/2004 SUNIL DUGGAL & ORS. ..... Appellants Through Mr. Nitin Sehgal, Advocate & Mr. Ashok...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 27 1981

S.K. Mahboob S/O Abdul Kadar and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-27-1981

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 188; Legal Practitioners Act, 1879 - Sections 36(4)

Reported in : 1982(2)BomCR23

Advocate for Appellant : D.Y. Lovekar, Adv.

M.P. Kanade, J.1. This revision is directed against the order of conviction and sentence passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Parbhani, dated April 3, 1980, convicting the petitioners under section 188 of the Indian Penal Code...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 16 2012

M/S Pan Parag India Ltd. (Formerly M/S Kothari Products Ltd.) Vs. Cce, ...

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Mar-16-2012

Subject : Service Tax

Advocate for Appellant : For the Appellants: K.K. Anand, Advocate. For the Respondent: A.K. Raha, Advocate.

Per Ms. Archana Wadhwa: 1. All the appeals are being disposed of by a common order as they arise out of a same impugned order passed by Commissioner in de-novo proceedings vide which he has held...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 20 2006

B.i.C. Sales Corporation and anr. Vs. Tinwari Automobiles and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Nov-20-2006

Subject : Intellectual Property RightsCivil

Reported in : 2007(34)PTC366(Raj)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. RK Thanvi

Dinesh Maheshwari, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties in both these Appeals, CMA No. 816/2003 and No. 897/2003, on admission and on prayer for interim relief.2. These two appeals have been preferred by the defendants...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 11 2006

Shri Hari Singh Rathore and ors. Vs. Drishti Media Private Ltd. and

Court : Company Law Board CLB

Decided on : Jul-11-2006

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2006)134CompCas248

1. The petitioners claiming to collectively hold 87.5% shares in the company, have filed this petition alleging that the 2nd and 3rd respondents are guilty of acts of oppression and mismanagement in the affairs of M/S...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 14 2005

Mangli Bai Vs. Meghnath Dhruv and ors.

Court : Chhattisgarh

Decided on : Jun-14-2005

Subject : InsuranceMotor Vehicles

Reported in : I(2006)ACC640

A.K. Patnaik, C.J.1. This is an appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the award dated 18th August, 1992 in Claim Case No. 83 of 1991 passed by the Second Additional Motor...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial