Advanced Search Results

B.D.A. Limited Vs. Shaw Wallace Company Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 2(1) and 29; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 17, 21 and 61

Reported in : 1996(5)BomCR672

Advocate for Appellant : V.R. Manohar, Sr. Counsel, ;V.C. Daga, S.P. Dharmadhikari and ;A.B. Oka, Advs.

B.U. Wahane, J.1. Blood is thick than water is exclaimed universally. No distance breaks the tie of blood; brothers are brothers evermore. Brothers foregoing world of pleasure for younger of same blood seems to have bared...

Management of the Advance Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Gurudasmal, Supdt. of ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 2(2), 3, 4(1), 5(1) and 6, 72, 94(3), 100, 100(1), (2) and (4), 175(3) and 311(1); Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 - Sections 2(3), 5, 5(3) and 46(3); Delhi Special Police Establishment (Amendment) Act, 1952; Constitution of India - Articles 77(2), 166, 166(1), (2) and (3), 227, 239, 239(1), 245, 246(4), 278, 358, 372, 372-A(1), 372-A and 385; Constitution (Seventh Amendment) Act, 1956; Adaptation of Laws Order, 1956; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(58) and (60), 8; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 54, 58, 156, 160, 161, 165, 166(1) and (3); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 56, 57, 62 and 63; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120-B, 405, 409 and 477-A; Insurance Act, 1938 - Sections 104 and 105; Bombay Police Ac

Reported in : AIR1969Delhi330; ILR1969Delhi426

Advocate for Appellant : A.K. Sen,; Porus A. Mehta,; B. Dutta and;

V.S. Deshpande, J.1. On the complaint dated 30-1-1968 by Shri S. Vanchinath, Income-tax Officer, Section X (Central), Bombay, against the petitioner company alleging commission of offences punishable under Sections 120B read with 409 and 409 and...

Tata Cellular Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ContractConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 136 and 226; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482; R.S.C. - Order 59, Rule 3(2)

Reported in : AIR1996SC11; [1994]Supp2SCR122

Advocate for Appellant : Soli J. Sorabjee,; M.H. Baing,; Ashok Sen,;

S. Mohan, J.1. Leave granted.2. All these appeals can be dealt with under a common judgment since one and same issue requires to be decided. The brief facts are as under :The Department of Telecommunications, Government...

Amalgamated Drugs and Pharmaceuticals Private Limited and anr. Vs. Sta ...

Court : Patna

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 22

Advocate for Appellant : Ashok Sen and K.N. Jain, Sr. Advs., Sen, Subre Sanyal, Suman Khaitan and Binod Kumar Bariar, Advs.

Aftab Alam, J. 1. Petitioner No. 1 in this application is an industrial consumer of electrical energy; it gets supply from the Bihar State Electricity Board ('the Board', for short) in terms of the High Tension...

J.K. Hosiery Factory Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 4(3) and 26A

Reported in : [1971]81ITR557(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Ashok Sen, Adv.

H.N. Seth, J.1. This is a reference made by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad Bench, in accordance with the direction issued by this court on 19th of July, 1961, in an application under Section 66(2) of...

Union of India and ors. Vs. Lachmi Narain

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941 - Sections 6(2); Union Territories (Laws) Act, 1950; Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) (Amendment) Act, 1959; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 21

Reported in : ILR1972Delhi475; [1973]32STC113(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : B.N. Sen,; B. Kirpal,; Ashok Sen,;

Hardayal Hardy, C.J.(1) This Letters Patent Appeal is directed against the judgment dated the 13th January, 1971, passed by Shri v. S. Deshpande, a single Judge of this Court in Civil Writ No. 574-D of 1966,...

Shiv Shankar Kapoor Vs. Amar Bose

Court : Delhi

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 21

Reported in : 33(1987)DLT92

Advocate for Appellant : Ashok Sen,; Urmila Kapoor and; G.C. Lalwani, Advs

H.C. Goel, J.(1) Shri Shiv Shankar, Kapoor appellant, had leased out the second floor of his house No. 19/10. Old Rajinder Nagar, New Delhi, to Amar Bose respondent for residential purpose for a limited period of...

Lachmi NaraIn Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941 - Sections 6(2) and 25(3); Union Territories (Laws) Act, 1950 - Sections 2; Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) (Delhi Amendment) Act, 1959 - Sections 6(2); Union Territories (Laws) Act, 1950 - Sections 2; Delhi Laws Act, 1912 - Sections 7

Reported in : ILR1971Delhi107; [1971]28STC21(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : Ashok Sen; K. Dayal and; B. Kirpal, Advs

V.S. Deshpande, J. (1) The nature and scope of delegated power to modify a Statute and the circumstances in which the exercise of such a power may be questioned are the general aspects of the questions...

Rotoflex Industries Vs. Collector of Customs

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 17, 17(1), 18, 47, 59, 72(2), 108, 111, 112, 129 and 129D; ;Import Control Order; ;Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1993(68)ELT347(Cal)

Advocate for Appellant : Ashok Sen, Adv.

Hazari, J.1. This is an application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, praying for an order for withdrawing, cancelling and/or rescinding the order of adjudication being Order No. 61/91, dated 9-10-1991 and...

Cruickshank and Co. Ltd. Vs. Da Breweries and Distilleries Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property RightsCriminal

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rule 1

Reported in : 1994IIAD(Delhi)245; 1994(29)DRJ196

Advocate for Appellant : Ashok Sen,; S. Pappu,; M.G. Ramachandran,;

Arun Kumar, J.(1) This judgment will dispose of F.A.O. No. 195/93 and F.A.O. (OS) No.183/93. (2) F.A.O. 195/93 is directed against an order dated 27th July 1992/28th July 1992 passed by Smt. R.S. Dalvi,Judge, City Civil...