Advanced Search Results

Sanjeev Puri Vs. State and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2007(2)JKJ434

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Ashok Parihar

Nirmal Singh, J.1. The facts are not in dispute. The Jammu and Kashmir Public Service Commission (hereinafter, for short, referred to as Commission) invited applications vide Notification No. 05-PSC of 2000 dated 11-02-2000 for five posts...

State of Jandk and ors. and Prithpal Singh Azad and anr. Vs. Altaf Hus ...

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Service

Acts : Jammu and Kashmir Reservation Rules, 1994 - Rules 10, 15, 15(1) and 15(2); ;Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16

Reported in : 2003(1)JKJ546

Advocate for Appellant : Ashok Parihar Addl. A.G.

1. All the L.P.A.'s are being disposed of by this common order, as common question of law and facts are involved in the appeals 2. Vide Advertisement Notice No. Pers/Rectt/SIs/Ex-99/A-450 dated 22-02-1999 applications were invited from...

Hans Raj Parihar and anr. Vs. State

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2008CriLJ2673,2007(2)JKJ209

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Ashok Parihar, Mr. Sunil Sethi

Hakim Imtiyaz Hussain, J.1. These two criminal transfer applications have been filed under Section 526 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking transfer of criminal challan titled State v. Hans Raj Parihar and six Ors., under...

Kedia Colonizers Ltd. Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2000)158CTR(Raj)481

Advocate for Appellant : A. Kasliwal, for the Petitioner

ORDERAshok Parihar, J.Petitioner has challenged the notice dated 1-12-1999, issued under section 142(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, by which the petitioner has been asked to file his reply/explanation with supporting evidence. The notice has...

Mamta Sharma (Dr.) Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Service

Reported in : RLW2004(3)Raj2063; 2004(1)WLC314

Advocate for Appellant : Ajay Rastogi, Adv.

Ashok Parihar, J.1. Looking to the short controversy involved in the present matter, the writ petition is disposed of at this stage.2. While doing her Post Graduate Course, the petitioner availed maternity leave for a period...

Surendra Nath Bhargava Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Civil

Reported in : RLW2008(1)Raj572

Ashok Parihar, J.1. The petitioner, a retired Chief Justice of the High Court, has also to seek remedy before this Court under writ jurisdiction. Petitioner has been denied reimbursement for putting a Cyphe Stent at the...

Municipal Council Vs. Judge, Labour Court and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 33(2)

Reported in : RLW2006(1)Raj833

Advocate for Appellant : K.N. Gupta, Adv.

Ashok Parihar, J.1. A dispute in regard to regularisation of services of the respondent No. 3, the concerned workman was raised and the same was referred accordingly by the State Government to the Labour Court, Jaipur,...

Shambhu Dayal Sharma and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : ServiceCivil

Reported in : RLW2004(4)Raj2146; 2004(1)WLC330

Advocate for Appellant : Suresh Sahni, Adv.

Ashok Parihar, J.1.Petitioners have challenged the Circular dated 1.7.2003, by which, certain directions have been issued by the State Government in regard to giving appointment to the post of Teacher Gr. III in pursuance to the...

Ganashere Gram Sewa Sahakari Samiti Ltd. Vs. the Judge Labour Court-cu ...

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Labour and industrial

Reported in : 2003(3)WLN118

Ashok Parihar, J1. By a notification dated 1.11.1993 the dispute in regard to the termination of services of respondent No. 2 (the concerned workman) was referred to the Labour Court,. Jaipur. After filing of statement of...

The Divisional Manager, Rsrtc Vs. Shri KamruddIn and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Labour and industrial

Reported in : 2004(5)WLC770; 2003(3)WLN107

Ashok Parihar, J.1. The dispute regarding termination of services of respondent No. 1 (the concerned workman) was referred to the Labour Court, Ajmer, for adjudication by the State Government vide notification dated 31.3.1990. The Labour Court,...