Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: ashok mehta · Page 1 of about 152 results (0.044 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 14 2002

In Re: U.P. Cement Corporation Ltd. (In Liquidation)

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-14-2002

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 443, 446, 457, 457(1), 466, 643(1) and 643(2); Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 20 and 20(1); Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rules 272 to 274

Reported in : [2002]112CompCas562(All)

Advocate for Appellant : R.P. Goel and ;Ashok Mehta, Advs.

ORDERSunh Ambwani, J. 1. U.P. State Cement Corporation Ltd. (UPSCCL) was declared as a Sick Industrial Company by Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR) on 7-10-1992, and IDBI was appointed as the Operating Agency. Cemtech...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 25 2000

R.K. Dubey Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-25-2000

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2000(1)AWC713; (2000)1UPLBEC764

Advocate for Appellant : Ashok Khare, Adv.

M. C. Jain, J.1. The petitioner retired from service on 31.12.1987. He was initially appointed as Naib Tehsildar in 1953 and was promoted to the post of Tehsildar in 1956. He was promoted as officiating Dy....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 04 1998

Kedia Castle Dallion Industries Ltd. and Another Vs. State of U. P. an ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-04-1998

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Sheera Niyantran Adhiniyam, 1964 - Sections 7A, 8, 8(1), (2) and (3) and 9 and 9(1); Uttar Pradesh Sheera Niyantran Niyamawali, 1974 - Rules 2, 12, 13, 14, 22 to 24 and 40; Essential Commodities Act - Sections 3 and 3(1); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1998(2)AWC867

Advocate for Appellant : K.D. Mishra and ;S.P. Gupta, Advs.

Palok Basu and D.K. Seth, JJ.1. These two writ petitions raise common questions and, therefore, when they were entertained on 24.11.1997, counter-affidavits were called from the respondents and in the meantime it was directed by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 23 2002

State of U.P. and ors. Vs. Anant Kumar Tiwari and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-23-2002

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15(1), 15(3), 16, 16(2) and 226; Uttar Pradesh Basic Education Act, 1972 - Sections 3, 4 and 13; Uttar Pradesh Basic Education (Teachers) Service Rules, 1981 - Rule 8; National Council for Teachers Education Act, 1993 - Sections 15

Reported in : 2003(3)AWC2060

Advocate for Appellant : R.N. Singh, SC, ;A.P. Shahi, ;P.S. Baghel, ;M.D. Singh Shekhar, ;K.R. Singh, ;Ashok Mehta and ;U.N. Pandey, Advs.

R.K. Agrawal, J. 1. Special Appeal No. 404 of 2002, has been filed by the State of U.P. through Secretary, Education U.P. Government, Lucknow, Director, State Council of Educational Research and Training, Lucknow and the Director...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 23 1998

Narendra Kumar Singh Gaur Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-23-1998

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 163, 164, 174, 356 and 356(1); Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 - Rule 3

Reported in : 1998(1)AWC438; (1998)1UPLBEC536

Advocate for Appellant : Ashok Mehta, ;S.P. Gupta and ;Yatindra Singh, Advs.

B. Dikshit and D.K. Seth, JJ. 1. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State Mr. Ashok Mehta and Mr. S. K. Rai for the Union of India on 21.2.1998 we had...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 14 2006

Rajesh Singh Son of Shri Ram Kishore Singh Vs. Labour Court,

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-14-2006

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Industrial Dispute Act - Sections 6N and 6P; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16 and 226

Reported in : 2006(4)AWC3661; [2006(111)FLR89]

Advocate for Appellant : Ashok Mehta, Adv.

Rajes Kumar, J.1. By means of the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner has challenged the award dated 22,06.2002 of the Prescribed Authority, Labour Court, Allahabad on a reference...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 11 2001

State of U.P. Vs. Indra Singh and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-11-2001

Subject : Service Constitution

Acts : Indian Forest Services (Appointment by Promotion) Regulations, 1966 - Regulation 5 and 5(1); Constitution of India - Article 226; Uttar Pradesh (Promotion by Selection in Consultation with Public Service Commission Procedure) Rules, 1970 - Rule 9; Indian Administrative Service (Appointment by Promotion) Regulations, 1955; I.P.S. (Appointment by Promotion) Regulations, 1955 - Regulation 5

Reported in : 2001LabIC4031; (2001)2UPLBEC1467

Advocate for Appellant : Ashok Mehta, S.C.

ORDERS.R. Singh, J. 1. These writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seek quashing of the Judgment and order dated 10.9.1997 rendered by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Allahabad Bench, Allahabad in three connected...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 18 1999

Akhil Bhartiya Manav Kalyan Samiti Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-18-1999

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 11

Reported in : 1999(1)AWC910

Advocate for Appellant : Ashok Mehta, C.S.C.

M. Katju and S. L. Saraf, JJ.1. Heard Sri Irshad All for the petitioner and Sri Ashok Mehta, learned Chief Standing Counsel for the respondents.2. This application has been filed for a prayer that the direction...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 20 1999

Regional Secretary Board of Secondary Education, Regional Office, Vara ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-20-1999

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5

Reported in : 1999(3)AWC2119; (1999)2UPLBEC1439

Advocate for Appellant : C.S.C., Ashok Mehta, Adv.

Ravi S. Dhavan, J.1. Ten defective beyond limitation special appeals have been filed. These appeals, all of them, have been filed on behalf of the Director, Board of High School and Intermediate Education. One appeal is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 16 2002

World Gem Corpn.Vs. Director of Enforcement

Court : Appellate Tribunal for foreign Exchange New Delhi

Decided on : Jan-16-2002

Subject : FERA

Advocate for Appellant : G.K. Rana and Ashok Mehta for the Appellant. Dr. Shamsuddin for the Respondent.

1. Through the medium of this application, the appellant (in Defective Appeal No. 221 of 2001) has sought the reliefs of transfer of the appeal before Special Director (Appeals) under section 17 of the Foreign Exchange...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial