Advanced Search Results

Vijay Nathalal Gohil Vs. The State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Appellant : Ashok Kumar Singh

1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(S).42 of 2010 VIJAY NATHALAL GOHIL Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Respondent(s) JUDGMENT INDIRA BANERJEE, J.1. This appeal is against the final judgment...

Raj Kumar Pandey. Vs. State of Bihar, and ors.

Court : Patna

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482, 203; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 147, 148, 149, 448, 380, 323, 182, 211

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, Adv.

1. The sole petitioner, while invoking inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, has prayed for quashing of an order dated 21.1.2003 passed by Shri S.K. Pandey, Judicial Magistrate,...

Smt. Priyanka Singh Vs. State of U.P. and Another

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Reported in : 1999(1)AWC735

Advocate for Appellant : Ashok Kumar Singh, Adv.

D. K. Seth, J.1. The petitioner by means of this writ petition prays for a mandamus directing the respondents to give appointment to the petitioner because the petitioner is eligible and qualified for being appointed as...

O.P. Tanwar and Others Vs. the Commissioner North Delhi Municipal Corp ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Ashok Kumar Singh

Oral Order: 1. In the present Original Application filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, the applicants have sought issuance of direction to the respondents to release the arrear of the DA and...

Anuj Kumar Singh vs.yogendra Prasad Singh

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh

$~13 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA4952016 ANUJ KUMAR SINGH Date of Decision:02. d August, 2017 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, Adv. versus YOGENDRA PRASAD SINGH Through:...

Kulamani Biswal vs.union of India and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, Mr. Neeraj Lalwani, Mr. Ashutosh Ranjan

$~27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3640/2019 & CM No.16653-16654/2019 KULAMANI BISWAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Ashok Kumar Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr Neeraj Lalwani and Mr Ashutosh Ranjan,...

Mr. Vinod Bhatia & Anr. vs Punjab and Sindh Bank & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, Mr. Rajiv Singh Chauhan, Mr. Rajat Joshi, Ms. Eesha Garg, Ms. Saloni Singh

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIReserved on: 06th May, 2026 Date of Decision: 13th May, 2026 + CM(M) 4175/2024 & CM APPL. 75736/2024 MR. VINOD BHATIA & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Ashok...

Amit Kumar & Ors. vs State (the Nct of Delhi) & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Ms. Swati, Mr. Umang Garg, Mr. Sanjay Lao, Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 9thApril, 2026 + W.P.(CRL) 1136/2026 & CRL.M.A. 10770/2026 AMIT KUMAR & ORS. .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Swati and Mr. Umang Garg, Advocates with petitioners-in-personversusSTATE...

indra Narayan Mahato Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Service

Acts : Service Law; Constitution of India - Article - 226

Reported in : [2004(2)JCR53(Jhr)]

Advocate for Appellant : A.R. Sarangi, Adv.

M.Y. Eqbal, J.1. Heard the parties.2. In this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the order dated 23.5.1995 issued by the Director, Secondary, Primary and Audit Education, Bihar by which he has held that...

Shiv Vir Singh Vs. State of U.P. and Another

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Plice Act, 1861 - Sections 7; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1998(1)AWC42

Advocate for Appellant : Rajendra Prasad Tiwari, Adv.

O.P. Garg, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned standing counsel on the question of admission, or, otherwise of the present writ petition. With the consent of both the parties, the...