Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: ashok kumar gupta · Page 1 of about 388 results (0.188 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 13 2007

Bhanu Shaha Vs. the State (Nct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-13-2007

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 120B, 302, 392, 394, 397 and 412; Criminal Procedur Code - Sections 313

Reported in : 140(2007)DLT495; 2007(95)DRJ385

Advocate for Appellant : Mukesh Jain, Adv. in Criminal Appeal No. 474 of 2003 and; Salil Jha, Adv. in Criminal Appeal No. 187 of

P.K. Bhasin, J.1. This judgment shall dispose of Criminal Appeal Nos. 474 of 2003 and 187 of 2004 filed by two appellants, Bhanu Shaha and Karan Bahadur Shaha, against the judgment dated 09.04.2003 passed by learned...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 03 2007

K.K. Jha 'Kamal' and Anr. and Tanzeem E. Sufia Vs. Shri Pankaj Kumar A ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Jul-03-2007

Subject : CriminalContempt of Court

Reported in : AIR2007Jhar67; [2007(3)JCR193(Jhr)]

ORDERM. Karpaga Vinayagam, C.J.1. The history leading to the initiation of the contempt proceedings against K.K. Jha 'Kamal' a lawyer practicing in this Court as well as against his client Ashok Kumar Gupta, the contemners is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 03 2007

Court on Its own motion Vs. K.K. Jha 'Kamal' and Ashok Kumar Gupta (Co ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Jul-03-2007

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226, 227 and 235; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 197; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 219; Contempt of Courts Act - Sections 2, 12 and 18; Jharkhand High Court Act - Sections 17; Jharkhand High Court Rules, 2001; Bar Council of India Act; Bar Council of India Rules; Bar Council of India Regulations; Supreme Court Rules

Reported in : 2007(2)BLJR2545

Advocate for Appellant : P.C. Tripathy and; Manjula Upadhyaya, Advs.;K.K. Jha 'Kamal'

M. Karpaga Vinayagam, C.J.1. The history leading to the initiation of the contempt proceedings against K.K. Jha 'Kamal' a lawyer practicing in this Court as well as against his client Ashok Kumar Gupta, the contemners is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 11 1997

S.S. Bola and Others Vs. B.D. Sardana and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-11-1997

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 309, 3; Punjab Service of Engineers, Class I, PWD (Buildings and Roads Branch), (Public Health Branch) Rules, 1960 - Rule 3(2);

Reported in : AIR1997SC3127; JT1997(6)SC637; 1997(5)SCALE90; (1997)8SCC522; [1997]Supp2SCR507

K. RAMASWAMY, J. (dissenting) 1. Application/s for impleadment allowed. 2. These appeals and transfer cases are wrapped up of complex facts interwoven with diverse principles in service jurisprudence, compounded by legislative intervention impinging upon judicial review...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 25 1999

State Vs. Chotey Lal and Others

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-25-1999

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 302, 392 and 411

Reported in : 1999IVAD(Delhi)560; 1999CriLJ3411; 80(1999)DLT339; 1999(50)DRJ513; ILR1999Delhi455

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. K.B. Andley,;Mr. Roopesh Sharma; Mr. Vikas Sharma, Adv. for accused;

ORDERAnil Dev Singh, J.1.By our order dated March 19, 1999, for the reasons which were to follow, Criminal Appeal Nos. 452/98 (Pawan Kumar v. State of Delhi), No. 508/98 (Ashok Kumar Singh v. The State), No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 28 1996

Dr. Chanemouga Soundaram C. and Others Vs. All India Institute of Medi ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-28-1996

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 141 and 226; Indian Medical Council Act, 1933 - Sections 5, 7, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 24 and 25; University Grants Commission Act, 1956

Reported in : AIR1996Delhi291

Advocate for Appellant : Shyam Moorjani, Adv

ORDERM. Jagannadha Rao, C. J.1. Themain points arising in this writ petition are whether the 33% quota for the MBBS graduates of the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi (hereinafter called 'AIIMS') in Post...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 04 1983

Smt. Sharda Devi Gupta Vs. Income-tax Officer.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-04-1983

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [1983]6ITD7(Delhi)

ORDER1. The assessed was betrothed to one Shri Ashok Kumar Gupta prior to April, 1977. Under a deed of partnership executed on 12-4-1977 she became a partner in the firm of Textile Centre, Chandani Chowk, Delhi,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 17 1993

Neelam Mahajan Singh Vs. Commissioner of Police and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-17-1993

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Indian Penal code, 1860 - Sections 95

Reported in : 1993IVAD(Delhi)9; 1994(2)Crimes75; 53(1994)DLT389; 1993(27)DRJ357; (1994)108PLR39

Advocate for Appellant : V.K. Shall,; P.S. Sharma and; P.K. Agarwal, Advs

Y.K. Sabharwal, J.(1) Petitioner Ms.Neelam Mahajan Singh (for short 'Ms. Singh') lives in Flat NO.A 506 on the 5th floor of multistoried complex at Kasturba Gandhi Marg, New Delhi, popularly known as Curzon Road flats. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 26 2002

Dr. M.K. Gaur and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-26-2002

Subject : Service

Acts : Rajasthan Educational Service (Collegiate Branch) Rules, 1986 - Rules 16 and 20

Reported in : RLW2003(2)Raj870; 2002(3)WLC367; 2002(5)WLN82

Advocate for Appellant : Mahendra Singh and; Shashi Jain, Advs.

Naolekar, J.1. The Director Education Government of Rajasthan sent a requisition vide communication dated 8.8.1995 to the Rajasthan Public Service Commission (for short, 'the Commission') for selection of suitable candidates to fill twenty-five vacancies of College...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 05 2014

Pankaj Unit No.1 Housing Development Company Private Limited and Anoth ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-05-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

The Notice of Motion applies for a decree on admission. The facts of the case may be briefly set out as follows. 2 Plaintiff Nos. 1 and 2 are companies under Part IX of the Companies...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial