Advanced Search Results
Mohan and Another Vs. State
Chennai
Aug-01-1995
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 201 and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 164, 173(2), 313 and 316; Evidence Act - Sections 133
1996CriLJ48
Mr. S. Ashok Kumar, Adv.
Kanakaraj, J. 1. Accused 1 and 2 in Sessions Case No. 15 of 1986, on the file of Sessions Judge, Dharmapuri at Krishnagiri, are the appellants in this appeal. They were convicted by learned Sessions Judge...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRanganathan Vs. Veerapandian and Others
Chennai
Sep-13-1995
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 304B, 309 and 498A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313(1); Evidence Act - Sections 113 and 113B
1996CriLJ540
Mr. S. Ashok Kumar, Adv.
ORDER1. Petitioner Ranganathan, examined P. W. 15 before the learned Principal Assistant Sessions Judge, Chengalput, in Sessions Case No. 225 of 1988, father of deceased by name Mandothari, has come forward with this revision, challenging the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA. Sathyanarayan S/O Suryanarayan Rep. by His G.P.A. Holder, Sri. A.S. ...
Karnataka
Apr-17-2008
BankingCriminal
Negotiable Imtruments Act - Sections 138, 139, 140 and 142; Money Lenders Act; Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 29 and 30; Power of Attorney Act - Sections 2; Evidence Act - Sections 118; General Clauses Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 196, 199 and 200; Bar Council of India Rules - Rules 6 and 9; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)
2008CriLJ3793; 2008(5)KarLJ622; ILR2008(2)Kar2650; 2008(3)KCCR1930; 2008(5)AIRKarR86; AIR2008NOC2544; 2008(4)CivilLJ592
K.R. Ashok Kumar, ;K.V. Nanjaiah and ;K. Suresh Reddy, Advs.
V. Jagannathan, J.1. Whether a Counsel is disentitled to appear for thus complainant on account of the Counsel being a creditor to the complainant and whether the Power of Attorney holder is incompetent to file the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Veera Swamy Vs. Dr. D.N. Domale
Andhra Pradesh
Aug-03-2000
Tenancy
Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960 - Sections 10(2); Hyderabad House Rent Controller Order, 1353 Fasli
2000(6)ALD41; 2000(5)ALT685
Mr. N. Ashok Kumar, Adv.
ORDER1. The revision petitioner is the tenant. He assails the order of the learned Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court, Hyderabad dated 21-3-2000 passed in RA No.153 of 1998 confirming the order of the Principal Rent...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. S.G. Teja Shah Chiranjit Lal and Co.
Allahabad
Dec-11-1996
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 188
[1997]224ITR267(All)
Ashok Kumar, Adv.
1. At the instance of the Revenue, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench 'B', Delhi, referred the following question for the opinion of this court ;' Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSekar Vs. State, Rep. by Sub-inspector of Police, Kanjanpur Police Sta ...
Chennai
Jul-28-1997
criminal
Penal Code (IPC), 1860 -- Sections 351 to 361, 362,363 and 366
1998(1)CTC134
Mr. S. Ashok Kumar, Adv.
ORDER1. The revision petitioner is the accused in S.C.No.117 of 1989 on the file of the Assistant Sessions Judge, Villupuram and the appellant in C.A.No.196 of 1990 on the file of the Additional Sessions Judge, South...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM. Ramachandran Vs. the State Rep. by Deputy Superintendent of Police, ...
Chennai
Mar-05-2003
Criminal
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 7, 12, 13(1), 13(2), 19 and 20; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 4 and 5(1)
2003CriLJ3376
S. Ashok Kumar, Adv. for T. Susindran, Adv. in Crl. A. 490/1996 and ;V.M. Rajendran, Addl. Public Prosecutor in Crl. A. 248/1997
P.D. Dinakaran, J.1. Heard.2.1. These appeals are directed against the judgment dated 12.6.1996 made in S.C.C. No. 118 of 1990 of the learned Special Judge-cum-I Additional District Judge and Chief Judicial Magistrate, Salem, convicting the first...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPrayag Udyog (P) Ltd. Vs. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal and anr.
Allahabad
Feb-07-2000
Direct Taxation
[2001]245ITR288(All)
Rajesh Kumar, for the Assessee Ashok Kumar, for the Revenue
By this petition under article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, an assessee under the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenges an order dated 29-7-1999, passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'A' Bench, Allahabad,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskParas Nath Singh Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.
Patna
Aug-09-2006
Service
Constitution of India - Article 21
Ashok Kumar Keshari, Adv.
Ramesh Kumar Datta, J. 1. Heard Mr. Ashok Kumar Keshari, learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned G.P.IX for the State.2. The petitioner seeks quashing of the Memo No. 1759 dated 19.9.2005 (Annexure-1) by which...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCit Vs. Shashi Kumar Agrawal
Allahabad
May-13-2003
Direct Taxation
[2003]131TAXMAN823(All)
Ashok Kumar, for the Revenue Pankaj Mittal, for the Assessee
ORDERHeard Shri Ashok Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant; and Shri Pankaj Mittal, learned counsel for the respondent-assessee.2. The following question of law has been referred to this court for opinion :'Whether, on the facts and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »