Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: ashok kumar · Page 1 of about 14,373 results (0.501 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 01 1995

Mohan and Another Vs. State

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-01-1995

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 201 and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 164, 173(2), 313 and 316; Evidence Act - Sections 133

Reported in : 1996CriLJ48

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. S. Ashok Kumar, Adv.

Kanakaraj, J. 1. Accused 1 and 2 in Sessions Case No. 15 of 1986, on the file of Sessions Judge, Dharmapuri at Krishnagiri, are the appellants in this appeal. They were convicted by learned Sessions Judge...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 13 1995

Ranganathan Vs. Veerapandian and Others

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-13-1995

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 304B, 309 and 498A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313(1); Evidence Act - Sections 113 and 113B

Reported in : 1996CriLJ540

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. S. Ashok Kumar, Adv.

ORDER1. Petitioner Ranganathan, examined P. W. 15 before the learned Principal Assistant Sessions Judge, Chengalput, in Sessions Case No. 225 of 1988, father of deceased by name Mandothari, has come forward with this revision, challenging the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 17 2008

A. Sathyanarayan S/O Suryanarayan Rep. by His G.P.A. Holder, Sri. A.S. ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-17-2008

Subject : BankingCriminal

Acts : Negotiable Imtruments Act - Sections 138, 139, 140 and 142; Money Lenders Act; Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 29 and 30; Power of Attorney Act - Sections 2; Evidence Act - Sections 118; General Clauses Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 196, 199 and 200; Bar Council of India Rules - Rules 6 and 9; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)

Reported in : 2008CriLJ3793; 2008(5)KarLJ622; ILR2008(2)Kar2650; 2008(3)KCCR1930; 2008(5)AIRKarR86; AIR2008NOC2544; 2008(4)CivilLJ592

Advocate for Appellant : K.R. Ashok Kumar, ;K.V. Nanjaiah and ;K. Suresh Reddy, Advs.

V. Jagannathan, J.1. Whether a Counsel is disentitled to appear for thus complainant on account of the Counsel being a creditor to the complainant and whether the Power of Attorney holder is incompetent to file the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 03 2000

Veera Swamy Vs. Dr. D.N. Domale

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-03-2000

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960 - Sections 10(2); Hyderabad House Rent Controller Order, 1353 Fasli

Reported in : 2000(6)ALD41; 2000(5)ALT685

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. N. Ashok Kumar, Adv.

ORDER1. The revision petitioner is the tenant. He assails the order of the learned Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court, Hyderabad dated 21-3-2000 passed in RA No.153 of 1998 confirming the order of the Principal Rent...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 11 1996

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. S.G. Teja Shah Chiranjit Lal and Co.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-11-1996

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 188

Reported in : [1997]224ITR267(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Ashok Kumar, Adv.

1. At the instance of the Revenue, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench 'B', Delhi, referred the following question for the opinion of this court ;' Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 28 1997

Sekar Vs. State, Rep. by Sub-inspector of Police, Kanjanpur Police Sta ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-28-1997

Subject : criminal

Acts : Penal Code (IPC), 1860 -- Sections 351 to 361, 362,363 and 366

Reported in : 1998(1)CTC134

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. S. Ashok Kumar, Adv.

ORDER1. The revision petitioner is the accused in S.C.No.117 of 1989 on the file of the Assistant Sessions Judge, Villupuram and the appellant in C.A.No.196 of 1990 on the file of the Additional Sessions Judge, South...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 05 2003

M. Ramachandran Vs. the State Rep. by Deputy Superintendent of Police, ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-05-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 7, 12, 13(1), 13(2), 19 and 20; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 4 and 5(1)

Reported in : 2003CriLJ3376

Advocate for Appellant : S. Ashok Kumar, Adv. for T. Susindran, Adv. in Crl. A. 490/1996 and ;V.M. Rajendran, Addl. Public Prosecutor in Crl. A. 248/1997

P.D. Dinakaran, J.1. Heard.2.1. These appeals are directed against the judgment dated 12.6.1996 made in S.C.C. No. 118 of 1990 of the learned Special Judge-cum-I Additional District Judge and Chief Judicial Magistrate, Salem, convicting the first...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 07 2000

Prayag Udyog (P) Ltd. Vs. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-07-2000

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2001]245ITR288(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Rajesh Kumar, for the Assessee Ashok Kumar, for the Revenue

By this petition under article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, an assessee under the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenges an order dated 29-7-1999, passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'A' Bench, Allahabad,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 09 2006

Paras Nath Singh Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Aug-09-2006

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 21

Advocate for Appellant : Ashok Kumar Keshari, Adv.

Ramesh Kumar Datta, J. 1. Heard Mr. Ashok Kumar Keshari, learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned G.P.IX for the State.2. The petitioner seeks quashing of the Memo No. 1759 dated 19.9.2005 (Annexure-1) by which...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 13 2003

Cit Vs. Shashi Kumar Agrawal

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-13-2003

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2003]131TAXMAN823(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Ashok Kumar, for the Revenue Pankaj Mittal, for the Assessee

ORDERHeard Shri Ashok Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant; and Shri Pankaj Mittal, learned counsel for the respondent-assessee.2. The following question of law has been referred to this court for opinion :'Whether, on the facts and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial