Advanced Search Results

Madan Gopal Vs. Sunder Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 - Sections 19

Reported in : (2004)137PLR839

Advocate for Appellant : Ashok Jindal, Adv.

H.S. Bedi, J.1. This petition arises out of an order dated 10.10.1983 made under Section 19(1)(3) read with Section 9(2) of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). As...

Bhagwan Dass Vs. Naresh Kumar and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 - Sections 13(2) and 13(3)

Reported in : (2004)138PLR245

Advocate for Appellant : Ashok Jindal, Adv.

H.S. Bedi, J.1. This appeal is directed against the order of the Appellate Authority dated 10.9.1998 by which the appeal filed by the landlord against the order of the Rent Controller dated 10.8.1996 dismissing the eviction...

Surinder Kumar and ors. Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 306

Reported in : II(1991)DMC186

Advocate for Appellant : J.N. Kaushal and; D.S. Bali, Sr. Advs.,; Ashok Jindal

S.D. Bajaj, J.1. Kiran Singla was married to Surinder Kumar accused in the year 1980. Around 9.30 P.M. on 6th October, 1983 a little more than three years after marriage, the bride committed suicide by sprinking...

Bhajan Singh Vs. Registered Firm Tarsem Chand Goyal

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Civil

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 73

Reported in : (2000)125PLR530

Advocate for Appellant : Ashok Jindal, Adv.

R.L. Anand, J.1. This is a Regular Second Appeal and has been directed against the judgment and decree dated 7.11.1978, passed by theAdditional District Judge, Sangrur, who allowed the appeal of the plaintiff-respondent and set aside...

Kapur Chand Vs. Municipal Committee Alias Nagar Palika and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Property

Acts : Punjab Public Premises and Land (Eviction and Rent Recovery) Rules, 1974 - Rule 4(1)

Reported in : (1998)119PLR128

Advocate for Appellant : Ashok Jindal, Adv.

G.S. Singhvi, J.1. The petitioner has prayed for quashing of the orders Annexures P-2, and P-3 passed by the respondent No. 3. He has also prayed for directing the respondents to restore to him the possession...

B.N. Industries and Another Vs. Commissioner of Customs (import) Nhava ...

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : For the Appellants : Shri Anil Balani, Advocate. For the Respondent : Shri Sanjay Kalra, Appraiser (AR).

Ashok Jindal: The appellants have filed these appeals along with stay applications. 2. The learned counsel for the appellants submitted that the appellant, namely, Shri Ashwini B Singhal has also filed an appeal against the impugned...

Ranjit Singh Vs. the Punjab State and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Land Acquisition

-1- Rs.No.1754 of 1986 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Rs.No.1754 of 1986 (O&M) Date of decision: 08.05.2014 Ranjit Singh ....Appellant Versus The Punjab State and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE PARAMJEET...

Jagjit Singh Ex. Major Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Civil

Acts : Army (Part I) Regulations, 1961 - Regulation 16

Reported in : (1995)110PLR421

Advocate for Appellant : H.S. Mattewal, Sr. Adv. and; R.S. Virk, Adv.

Jawahar Lal Gupta, J.1. Is the petitioner who was dismissed from the Army service in February, 1986, entitled to the grant of pension in spite of the fact that the President of India has passed an...

M/S. Adinath Trading Vs. Commissioner of Customs (import), Mumbai Ii

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Miscellaneous

Advocate for Appellant : None for Appellants. Shri B.P. Pereira, JDR for Respondents.

Per : Ashok Jindal These appeals are listed today for final hearing. Despite notice none appeared for the appellants nor there is any request for adjournment. Earlier also the matter has been adjourned several times such...

M/S. Big Apple Computer Vs. Commissioner of Customs(import), Mumbai

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Limitation

Advocate for Appellant : None for Appellants. Shri N.A. Sayyad, JDR for Respondents.

Per : Ashok Jindal This matter was listed for hearing today when none appeared for the applicant despite notice. It is also noticed from the records that this matter was listed before this Tribunal on 05.07.10,...