Advanced Search Results

Shiv Kumar Sharma Vs. Santosh Kumari

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Specific Relief Act - Sections 21, 38 and 41; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 35A and 96 - Order 2, Rules 2, 3, 4 - Order 7, Rule 7, Order 20, Rule 12 - Order 41, Rule 31; ;Constitution of India - Articles 142, 226 and 227

Reported in : AIR2008SC171,2007(6)ALLMR(SC)935,2007(6)ALT13(SC),2008(2)BomCR313,(SCSuppl)2007(4)CHN89,2007(5)CTC453,2008(1)CTLJ108(SC),JT2007(11)SC260,2008MhLJ593,(2008)149PLR18; (2007)8SCC600; AIR 2008 SC 171

Advocate for Appellant : Ashok Bhasin, Sr. Adv.,; Shantanu Rastogi and; R.S. Lamat

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. Propriety or otherwise of certain directions issued by a Division Bench of the Delhi High Court is in question in this appeal which arises out of a judgment and order dated...

Puneet Industrial Controls (P) Ltd. and ors. Vs. Aditya Enterprises Pv ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : 1999IIAD(Delhi)820; 78(1999)DLT811

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. R.K. Aggarwal, Adv

ORDERK. Ramamoorthy, J.1. The plaintiffs have filed the this application for injunction. The point involved in the case lies in a very narrow compass. The plaintiffs filed the Suit No.2852-94 against M/s. Classic Electronics and Mr....

Nirmal Verma Vs. Mcd and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Election

Acts : CCS (Conduct) Rules - Rule 5 and 5(2); CCS (Pension) Rules - Rule 26(4) and 26(5)

Reported in : 118(2005)DLT665; 2006(1)SLJ243(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : Parag P. Tripathi, Sr. Adv. and; Rajesh Goyal, Adv

ORDERReference to your application dated 01.04.2002, requesting for withdrawal of resignation from the post of H.M.In this regard, it is inform you that your request of withdrawal of resignation has been turned down by competent authority....

Master 'X' vs. 'Y'

Court : Delhi

Subject : FamilyCivil

Acts : Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 - Sections 23; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 112

Reported in : AIR2003Delhi195; 2003(69)DRJ21

Advocate for Appellant : Ashok Bhasin, Adv

ORDERManmohan Sarin, J. 1. By this Judgment IAs 5018/2002 and 5019/2002 are being decided. Vide is 5018/2002 plaintiff seeks a direction to the defendant to undergo the DNA test along with plaintiffs mother, to establish the...

Daman Babbar Nirula and Ors. Vs. State of Nct of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:12. h May, 2015 % + BAIL APPLN. 146/2015 SAMRAT SINGH NIRULA & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through Mr.Ashok Bhasin, Sr. Adv. and Mr.Vikas Pahwa,...

Samrat Singh Nirula and Ors. Vs. State of Nct of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:12. h May, 2015 % + BAIL APPLN. 146/2015 SAMRAT SINGH NIRULA & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through Mr.Ashok Bhasin, Sr. Adv. and Mr.Vikas Pahwa,...

Indra Vikas Samiti & Anr vs.state Govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~35 * + W.P.(C) 31/2017 & C.M.No.193/2017 INDRA VIKAS SAMITI & ANR ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Ashok Bhasin, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Bhuvanesh Sehgal, Advocate. versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT...

i.P.S. Ahluwalia Vs. C.B.i.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 453/2003 Reserved on:7. h March, 2013 Decided on:23. d May, 2013 % I.P.S. AHLUWALIA Through ..... Appellant Mr. Ashok Bhasin, Sr. Adv. with Mr....

Tej Kishan Sadhu Vs. State and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 292/2013 Judgment delivered on:02. 05.2013 TEJ KISHAN SADHU Through: ... Petitioner Mr. U.U. Lalit, Senior Advocate, Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate, Mr. Ramesh Gupta, Senior...

B.W.L. Ltd. vs. M.T.N.L.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 11

Reported in : 2000IVAD(Delhi)165; 85(2000)DLT84; 2000(53)DRJ437

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Parag Tripathi, Sr. Advocate,; Ms. Mukti Chaudhary and;

ORDERVikarmajit Sen, J.1. By this judgment I propose to decide three petitions filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Arbitration Application No. 45/1998 is directed against the Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd.; and...