Advanced Search Results
Society of Auditors Vs. Comptroller and Auditor General of India
Chennai
Oct-01-1999
Direct Taxation
[2000]111TAXMAN516(Mad)
Arvind P. Datar, for the Petitioner N.R. Chandran, R. Srinivasamoorthy, S. Ravikumar and V.R. Rajasekaran, for the Respondent
ORDER1. Chartered Accountants Study Circle, the petitioners in W.P. Nos. 12631 and 12479 of 1999, as well as the Society of Auditors, the petitioners in W.P. Nos. 12480 and 12630 of 1999 are societies registered under...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChartered Accountants Study Circle Vs. Institute of Chartered Accounta ...
Chennai
Oct-01-1999
Direct Taxation
[2000]108TAXMAN341(Mad)
Arvind P. Datar and V.R. Rajasekaran, for the Petitioner N.R. Chandran, R. Srinivasamoorthy and S. Ravikurnar, for the Respondent
ORDER1. Chartered Accountants Study Circle, the petitioners in W.P. Nos. 12631 and 12479 of 1999 as well as the Society of Auditors, the petitioners in W.P. Nos. 12480 and 12630 of 1999, are societies registered under...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSociety of Auditors and Etc. Vs. Comptroller and Auditor General of In ...
Chennai
Oct-01-1999
Civil
Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 19(6) and 226; Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 - Sections 19, 30(1), 30(3), 30A and 30B; Chartered Accountants Regulations, 1988 - Regulation 186; Banking Regulation Act, 1949 - Sections 30 and 31; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 226 and 619; Income-tax Act - Sections 138
AIR2000Mad92
Arvind P. Datar, Adv.
ORDERP.D. Dinakaran, J.1. Chartered Accountants Study Circle, the petitioners in W.P. Nos. 12631 and 12479 of 1999, as well as the Society of Auditors the petitioners in W.P. Nos. 12480 and 12630 of 1999 are societies...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Coimbatore Stock Exchange Limited Represented by Its Director Ashok Lu ...
Chennai
Aug-25-2006
Company
Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 - Sections 10E(5), 10E(6), 11, 11(2), 11A, 11B, 15T, 19, 20, 29, 68, 85B(1), 94A, 105B to 105E, 234, 235, 236, 237 and 642(1); Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 169; Securities Contracts Regulation Act, 1956 - Sections 2, 3, 3(2), 4, 4(5), 4A, 4B, 5, 5(2), 11, 11(1), 11(2), 11(4), 12A, 19, 22, 22A, 23G, 23L, 29, 29A and 30; Securities Contracts Regulation Rules, 1957 - Rules 6, 7, 416, 421, 422 and 427; Securities and Exchange Board of India Rules; Securities and Exchange Board of India Regulations; Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 - Sections 3; Banking Regulation Act, 1949 - Sections 45; Taxation on Income (Investigation Commission) Act, 1947 - Sections 5(1) and 5(4); Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 1964; Public Utility Holding company Act of
[2007]137CompCas863(Mad); [2007]74SCL1(Mad)
Arvind P. Datar, Sr. Counsel assisted by ;Rahul Balaji, Adv. for Satish Parasaran, Adv.
ORDERV. Dhanapalan, J.1. By consent of the learned Senior Counsel on either side, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal.2. This writ petition has been filed seeking issuance of a writ of certiorarified...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMariappan Vs. A.R. Safiullah,
Chennai
Jun-30-2008
Intellectual Property Rights
Designs Act, 2000 - Sections 23 and 53; Patents Act, 1970 - Sections 2, 12, 13(4), 43, 45(1), 48, 53, 104 and 108; Patents and Designs Act, 1911 - Sections 11 and 26(1); Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005; Copyright Act, 1967; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2
2008(5)CTC97; LC2008(3)431; (2008)6MLJ1117; 2008(38)PTC341(Mad)
Arvind P Datar Sr. Counsel for ;Sivam Sivanandaraj, Adv. in O.S.A. No. 263 of 2006, ;P.S. Raman, Sr. Counsel in O.S.A. 283 of 2006
M. Sathyanarayanan, J.1. The orders passed herein will govern the disposal of O.S.A. Nos. 263 and 283 of 2006.For the sake of convenience, the array of parties as referred in C.S. No. 448 of 2006, is...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: G.V. Films Ltd.
Chennai
Dec-04-2008
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 1, 2, 2(12), 3, 9, 2(12), 75, 78, 78(1), 78(2), 94 to 97, 100 to 105, 217(1), 235 to 251, 390 to 394 and 643; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 21; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rules 47 and 85; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 38, Rule 5
[2009]150CompCas415(Mad)
P.S. Raman, Adv. for ;Rugan and ;Arya, Advs. in C.P. Nos. 96 to 98 of 2008 and ;Arvind P. Datar and ;R. Venkatavaradan, Advs. in C.A. Nos. 1177 and 1178 of 2008;T.K. Seshadri and ;T.K. Bhaskar, Advs.;
Chitra Venkataraman, J.1. GV Films Ltd., hereinafter referred to as 'demerged company', is the petitioner in C.P. No. 96 of 2008 ; GV Studio City Ltd., (hereinafter referred to as 'first resulting company'), is the petitioner...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIndian Institute of Architects Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Chennai
Apr-30-2001
Service TaxConstitution
Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65(5), 65(31), 65(48) and 93; Constitution of India - Article 14
(2002)175CTR(Mad)449; 2002(139)ELT245(Mad); [2002]258ITR209(Mad); 2006[2]STR393; [2007]6STT112
Arvind P. Datar, Sr. Counsel for ;R. Senthilkumar and ;Chitra Narayan, ;N. Dhanasekaran, ;Mohan Parasaran, ;N. Inbaragam, ;Meenakshisundaram, ;B.R. Ramesh Babu and ;T. Susindran, Advs.
V.S. Sirpurkar, J. 1. This judgment will govern the above writ petitions, which are filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Out of the above writ petitions, while W.P. No. 8539 of 2000 is...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAban Loyd Chile Offshore Ltd. Vs. Subash Projects and Marketing Ltd., ...
Chennai
Dec-08-2005
Arbitration
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 11(6) and 16; Constitution of India - Article 226
2006(2)ARBLR79(Madras); 2005(5)CTC781; (2006)1MLJ226
Arvind P. Datar, Sr. Counsel for R. Venkataravaradhan, Adv. in W.P.No.4617/2005 and ;V. Srikanth, Adv. in W.P.No.14408/2005
ORDERP. Sathasivam, J.1. Since the issues raised are identical in both the writ petitions, they are being disposed of by the following common order.2. In W.P.No.4617 of 2005, M/s.Aban Loyd Chile Offshore Limited, Chennai-8, challenges the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTata Sky Limited, Mumbai and Others Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu Throug ...
Chennai
Oct-19-2012
Service Tax
For the Petitioners: Arvind P. Datar, S.C. for C. Prasanna Venkatesh, C. Natarajan, S.C. for N. Inbarajan, A.V.K. Ezhilmani, Joseph George, N. Venkataraman, S.C. for Mohammed Shaffiq, Advocates. For the Respondents: R1 & R2, S. Navaneetha Krishnan, A.G, C
(Prayer: W.P.No.25721 of 2011 is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issue of a Writ declaring Sections 3(3-B), 3(4), 3(9), 4-I, 7-A(1) & (3), 7-B(1) & (2) and S.10(1) ["impugned provisions"]...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVivek Goenka Vs. Manoj Sonthalia
Chennai
Apr-13-1993
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 291 and 397
[1995]83CompCas897(Mad)
P. Chidambaram,;Harish N. Salve and;Arvind P. Datar, Advs.
Ar. Lakshmanan J.1. Applications Nos. 841 and 5129 of 1992 were filed by the sixth defendant in the suit for the following reliefs: 2. Application No. 841 of 1992: To pass an order of injunction restraining...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »