Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: arvind p datar · Page 1 of about 288 results (0.202 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 01 1999

Society of Auditors Vs. Comptroller and Auditor General of India

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-01-1999

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2000]111TAXMAN516(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : Arvind P. Datar, for the Petitioner N.R. Chandran, R. Srinivasamoorthy, S. Ravikumar and V.R. Rajasekaran, for the Respondent

ORDER1. Chartered Accountants Study Circle, the petitioners in W.P. Nos. 12631 and 12479 of 1999, as well as the Society of Auditors, the petitioners in W.P. Nos. 12480 and 12630 of 1999 are societies registered under...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 01 1999

Chartered Accountants Study Circle Vs. Institute of Chartered Accounta ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-01-1999

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2000]108TAXMAN341(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : Arvind P. Datar and V.R. Rajasekaran, for the Petitioner N.R. Chandran, R. Srinivasamoorthy and S. Ravikurnar, for the Respondent

ORDER1. Chartered Accountants Study Circle, the petitioners in W.P. Nos. 12631 and 12479 of 1999 as well as the Society of Auditors, the petitioners in W.P. Nos. 12480 and 12630 of 1999, are societies registered under...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 01 1999

Society of Auditors and Etc. Vs. Comptroller and Auditor General of In ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-01-1999

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 19(6) and 226; Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 - Sections 19, 30(1), 30(3), 30A and 30B; Chartered Accountants Regulations, 1988 - Regulation 186; Banking Regulation Act, 1949 - Sections 30 and 31; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 226 and 619; Income-tax Act - Sections 138

Reported in : AIR2000Mad92

Advocate for Appellant : Arvind P. Datar, Adv.

ORDERP.D. Dinakaran, J.1. Chartered Accountants Study Circle, the petitioners in W.P. Nos. 12631 and 12479 of 1999, as well as the Society of Auditors the petitioners in W.P. Nos. 12480 and 12630 of 1999 are societies...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 25 2006

Coimbatore Stock Exchange Limited Represented by Its Director Ashok Lu ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-25-2006

Subject : Company

Acts : Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 - Sections 10E(5), 10E(6), 11, 11(2), 11A, 11B, 15T, 19, 20, 29, 68, 85B(1), 94A, 105B to 105E, 234, 235, 236, 237 and 642(1); Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 169; Securities Contracts Regulation Act, 1956 - Sections 2, 3, 3(2), 4, 4(5), 4A, 4B, 5, 5(2), 11, 11(1), 11(2), 11(4), 12A, 19, 22, 22A, 23G, 23L, 29, 29A and 30; Securities Contracts Regulation Rules, 1957 - Rules 6, 7, 416, 421, 422 and 427; Securities and Exchange Board of India Rules; Securities and Exchange Board of India Regulations; Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 - Sections 3; Banking Regulation Act, 1949 - Sections 45; Taxation on Income (Investigation Commission) Act, 1947 - Sections 5(1) and 5(4); Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 1964; Public Utility Holding company Act of

Reported in : [2007]137CompCas863(Mad); [2007]74SCL1(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : Arvind P. Datar, Sr. Counsel assisted by ;Rahul Balaji, Adv. for Satish Parasaran, Adv.

ORDERV. Dhanapalan, J.1. By consent of the learned Senior Counsel on either side, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal.2. This writ petition has been filed seeking issuance of a writ of certiorarified...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 30 2008

Mariappan Vs. A.R. Safiullah,

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-30-2008

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Designs Act, 2000 - Sections 23 and 53; Patents Act, 1970 - Sections 2, 12, 13(4), 43, 45(1), 48, 53, 104 and 108; Patents and Designs Act, 1911 - Sections 11 and 26(1); Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005; Copyright Act, 1967; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : 2008(5)CTC97; LC2008(3)431; (2008)6MLJ1117; 2008(38)PTC341(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : Arvind P Datar Sr. Counsel for ;Sivam Sivanandaraj, Adv. in O.S.A. No. 263 of 2006, ;P.S. Raman, Sr. Counsel in O.S.A. 283 of 2006

M. Sathyanarayanan, J.1. The orders passed herein will govern the disposal of O.S.A. Nos. 263 and 283 of 2006.For the sake of convenience, the array of parties as referred in C.S. No. 448 of 2006, is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 04 2008

In Re: G.V. Films Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-04-2008

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 1, 2, 2(12), 3, 9, 2(12), 75, 78, 78(1), 78(2), 94 to 97, 100 to 105, 217(1), 235 to 251, 390 to 394 and 643; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 21; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rules 47 and 85; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 38, Rule 5

Reported in : [2009]150CompCas415(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : P.S. Raman, Adv. for ;Rugan and ;Arya, Advs. in C.P. Nos. 96 to 98 of 2008 and ;Arvind P. Datar and ;R. Venkatavaradan, Advs. in C.A. Nos. 1177 and 1178 of 2008;T.K. Seshadri and ;T.K. Bhaskar, Advs.;

Chitra Venkataraman, J.1. GV Films Ltd., hereinafter referred to as 'demerged company', is the petitioner in C.P. No. 96 of 2008 ; GV Studio City Ltd., (hereinafter referred to as 'first resulting company'), is the petitioner...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 30 2001

Indian Institute of Architects Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-30-2001

Subject : Service TaxConstitution

Acts : Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65(5), 65(31), 65(48) and 93; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : (2002)175CTR(Mad)449; 2002(139)ELT245(Mad); [2002]258ITR209(Mad); 2006[2]STR393; [2007]6STT112

Advocate for Appellant : Arvind P. Datar, Sr. Counsel for ;R. Senthilkumar and ;Chitra Narayan, ;N. Dhanasekaran, ;Mohan Parasaran, ;N. Inbaragam, ;Meenakshisundaram, ;B.R. Ramesh Babu and ;T. Susindran, Advs.

V.S. Sirpurkar, J. 1. This judgment will govern the above writ petitions, which are filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Out of the above writ petitions, while W.P. No. 8539 of 2000 is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 08 2005

Aban Loyd Chile Offshore Ltd. Vs. Subash Projects and Marketing Ltd., ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-08-2005

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 11(6) and 16; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2006(2)ARBLR79(Madras); 2005(5)CTC781; (2006)1MLJ226

Advocate for Appellant : Arvind P. Datar, Sr. Counsel for R. Venkataravaradhan, Adv. in W.P.No.4617/2005 and ;V. Srikanth, Adv. in W.P.No.14408/2005

ORDERP. Sathasivam, J.1. Since the issues raised are identical in both the writ petitions, they are being disposed of by the following common order.2. In W.P.No.4617 of 2005, M/s.Aban Loyd Chile Offshore Limited, Chennai-8, challenges the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 19 2012

Tata Sky Limited, Mumbai and Others Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu Throug ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-19-2012

Subject : Service Tax

Advocate for Appellant : For the Petitioners: Arvind P. Datar, S.C. for C. Prasanna Venkatesh, C. Natarajan, S.C. for N. Inbarajan, A.V.K. Ezhilmani, Joseph George, N. Venkataraman, S.C. for Mohammed Shaffiq, Advocates. For the Respondents: R1 & R2, S. Navaneetha Krishnan, A.G, C

(Prayer: W.P.No.25721 of 2011 is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issue of a Writ declaring Sections 3(3-B), 3(4), 3(9), 4-I, 7-A(1) & (3), 7-B(1) & (2) and S.10(1) ["impugned provisions"]...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 13 1993

Vivek Goenka Vs. Manoj Sonthalia

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-13-1993

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 291 and 397

Reported in : [1995]83CompCas897(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : P. Chidambaram,;Harish N. Salve and;Arvind P. Datar, Advs.

Ar. Lakshmanan J.1. Applications Nos. 841 and 5129 of 1992 were filed by the sixth defendant in the suit for the following reliefs: 2. Application No. 841 of 1992: To pass an order of injunction restraining...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial