Advanced Search Results

Nanku Baitha Vs. Rajni Ranjan and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 140, 140(2) and 173

Reported in : II(2003)ACC535; [2003(2)JCR111(Jhr)]

Advocate for Appellant : Arvind Kumar Lal, Adv.

1. Heard the parties. 2. This appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent is directed against the judgment dated 24.11.1997 passed in Misc. Appeal No. 222/96 whereby the learned Single Judge allowed the appeal filed...

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Chelpark Co. (P) Ltd.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11A, 11AB, 11AC and 11C; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 96ZP(3), 172 and 173Q

Reported in : 2007(119)ECC390; 2007LC390(Karnataka); 2007(216)ELT364(Kar)

Advocate for Appellant : Arvind Kumar, Adv.

R. Gururajan and Anand Byrareddy , J.J1. State is before us aggrieved by the order of the tribunal in the case on hand. Respondent is covered by the Central Excise Laws. It claimed duty exemption on...

Sarla Goel and ors. Vs. Kishan Chand

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 8(2), 8(3), 8(4), 8(5), 14, 14(1), 14(2), 15, 26, 26(2), 26(3) and 27; Punjab Relief of Indebtedness Act, 1934; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 106; Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control)

Reported in : 160(2009)DLT687(SC); JT2009(9)SC21; RLW2009(3)SC2017; 2009(9)SCALE392; (2009)7SCC658; 2009(8)LC3601(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Arvind Kumar Gupta and; B.B. Singh, Advs

Tarun Chatterjee, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal is directed against an order dated 12th of December, 2007 passed by a learned Judge of the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in Civil Misc. (Main) No....

Brij Lal Patel Vs. U.P. State Agro Industrial Corporation and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 16 and 49(1); Bar Council of India Rules, 1975

Reported in : AIR2004All178

Advocate for Appellant : K.P. Agarwal and ;Arvind Kumar, Advs.

ORDERR.B. Misra, J.1. Writ Petition No. 28709 of 1993 Brij Lal Patel v. U.P. State Agro Industrial Corporation and another was dismissed in default by an order dated 24-7-2003 which reads as below :'Sri Arvind Kumar...

Raja Ram Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Regularisation of Ad hoc Appointments (On Posts Outside the Purview of the Public Service Commission) Rules, 1979 - Rules 4 and 10

Reported in : 2003(3)AWC1736b; (1996)3UPLBEC1814

Advocate for Appellant : D.S. Chaube, Adv.

N.K. Mehrotra, J.1. This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to quash the impugned order of termination dated 13.10.1986, passed by the opposite party No. 3 Executive Engineer, Minor...

D.G. Dalal Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Service Law; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16; Gujarat Civil Services Recruitment (Examination) Rules, 1980 - Rule 9

Reported in : (2002)2GLR1011

Advocate for Appellant : Paresh Upadhyay, Adv.

M.R. Calla, J.1. Through these 16 Special Civil Applications, the petitioners have sought to challenge the allotment of posts made to the concerned respondents or no allotment and the method of allotment or assignment of preference...

State of Haryana and ors. Vs. Ram Bhaj

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 100; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5

Reported in : 2005ACJ100; (2003)135PLR335

Advocate for Appellant : N.K. Joshi, A.A.G.

M.M. Kumar, J. 1. State of Haryana-defendant-appellants have filed the instant appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for brevity, 'the Code') challenging the concurrent findings that the department of PWD (B&R;),...

U.P. State Electricity Board Through the Executive Engineer, Electrica ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : [2008(119)FLR10]; (2009)ILLJ470All

Advocate for Appellant : Sri. Arvind Kumar

Rakesh Tiwari, J.1. Heard Sri Arvind Kumar, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri Rajesh Tiwari, learned Counsel for respondents as well as Sri S.N. Tripathi, learned Standing Counsel.2. The facts of the case are that...

Yogesh Mehta Vs. Custodian Appointed Under the Special Court and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Contract

Acts : Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992 - Sections 3 and 3(3); Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 55

Reported in : 2007(4)ALLMR(SC)781; 2007(1)BLJR221; (2007)1CompLJ232(SC); 2007(1)CTLJ84(SC); [2007(2)JCR114(SC)]; (2007)3MLJ501; 2007(1)SCALE105; (2007)2SCC624; 2007(1)LC0093(SC); 2007AIRSCW885

Advocate for Appellant : Indu Malhotra,; Gopal and; Vikas Mehta, Advs

S.B. Sinha, J.Introduction:1. Application of terms and conditions of sale of properties in terms of the provisions of the Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992 (for short, 'the Act') is...

Serious Fraud Investigation Office Vs. Sahara Housing Investment Corpo ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA __

CA42992022 1 Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No 4299 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No 531 of 2022) Serious Fraud Investigation Office Appellants and Others Versus Sahara...