Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: arvind dudawat · Page 1 of about 24 results (0.023 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 10 2007

Lajja Bai Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-10-2007

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR2008MP185

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. D.P. Singh

Abhay Gohil, J.1. The appellant, who is the former Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat, Sillarpur, Karera, District Shivpuri, has filed this Writ Appeal under Section 2 of the M.P. Ucchha Nyalaya (Khand Nyay Peeth Ko Appeal) Adhiniyam,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 19 2002

Hariom Singh Rajput Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-19-2002

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, 1993 - Sections 69 and 69(1)

Reported in : 2002(3)MPHT541; 2002(3)MPLJ204

Advocate for Appellant : Arvind Dudawat, Adv.

ORDERRajendra Menon, J. 1. The petitioner who is a Panchayat Karmi challenges the order Annexure P-5, dated 24-1-2001 passed by the respondent No. 3 by which the powers of Secretary have been withdrawn from the petitioner.2....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 18 1990

Hari Shankar and ors. Vs. State

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-18-1990

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 438 and 438(1); Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - Sections 3(1), 14 and 18

Reported in : 1990CriLJ1799

Advocate for Appellant : V.S. Thakur, Adv.

ORDERK.K. Varma, J.1. Applicants by Shri V.S. Thakur, Advocate.2. State by Shri Arvind Dudawat, Addl. Goverment Advocate.3. They are heard.4. The applicants -- concededly Brahimins by caste -- apprehend their arrest in Crime No. 61/90 P....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 15 2014

Shree Agencies Pvt.Ltd. and Another Vs. M.P.State Mining Corporation a ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-15-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. These applications were analogous heard on the joint request of the parties. It is agreed by learned counsel for the parties that the legal questions involved in these matters are similar. 2. The facts are...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 20 1986

State of M.P. Vs. Kalyan and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-20-1986

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1987CriLJ209

ORDERRam Pal Singh, J.1. After obtaining the requisite leave, the State-appellant has preferred this appeal against the judgment of acquittal recorded by Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Sheopur Kalan, in criminal case No. 304 of 1982 dt....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 30 2008

Gram Panchayat Vs. Jagdish Singh Rawat and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-30-2008

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 2008(4)MPHT132

A.K. Gohil, J.1. The appellant has filed this Writ Appeal under Section 2(1) of the Madhya Pradesh Uchcha Nyayalaya (Khand Nyaypeeth Ko Appeal) Adhiniyam, 2005, against the order dated 29-8-2007 passed by the learned Single Judge...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 17 2014

Rajaram and Others Vs. State of M.P. and Others

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-17-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Arvind Dudawat, Shri. Dudawat

1. In this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners, villagers of Village Badora, Tehsil Karera, District Shivpuri have called in question the legality, validity and propriety of the notification dated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 30 2002

Ashok Kumar Rawat Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-30-2002

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitutioin of India - Articles 226, 226 and 243O; Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Raj Avam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam, 1993 - Sections 122

Reported in : 2002(4)MPHT246; 2002(4)MPLJ446

Advocate for Appellant : S.B. Mishra, Sr. Adv. and ;J.P. Mishra, Adv.

ORDERRajendra Menon, J. 1. Petitioner by this petition has challenged the notification, Annexure P-1 issued under the provisions of Rule 22 of the Panchayat (Up-Sar-panch, President and Vice-President) Nirvachan Niyam, 1995 by which the respondent No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 05 2014

Rishikesh Singh Vs. Seema Arora and Others

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-05-2014

Subject : Education

This review petition has been filed for review of the order dated 05.03.2014 passed in Writ Petition No.8065/2013. Petitioner submitted an application for grant of permanent permit on 20.08.2009. The said application was considered by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 08 1988

Bahadur Singh Vs. Pahalwan Singh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-08-1988

Subject : Election

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Madhya Pradesh Krishi Upaj Mandi Adhiniyam, 1973 - Sections 79; Madhya Pradesh Upaj Mandi (Adhisuchana Prakashan Riti, Bharsadhak Samiti Tatha Mandi Samiti Gathan) Niyam, 1974 - Rules 38, 44 and 44(2)

Reported in : AIR1988MP236

Advocate for Appellant : N.K. Jain, Adv.

T.N. Singh, J.1. A torn and tattered petition it is, so it is contended by respondent's counsel. Because, for the battered cause relief has to be sought in popular mandate and not in legal battle. That,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial