Advanced Search Results
Vidya Wati and ors. Vs. Kashmiri Lal Jiwan Lal
Punjab and Haryana
Oct-11-1999
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 9, Rule 8 - Order 17, Rule 3
(2000)124PLR577
None
R.L. Anand, J.1. Unsuccessful plaintiffs Vidya Wati and others have filed the present R.S.A. and it has been directed against the judgment and decree dated 4.12.1979 passed by the Court of Additional District Judge, Patiala, who...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPunjab Wakf Board Vs. Raghbir Singh (Dead) Through Lrs.
Punjab and Haryana
Aug-18-2004
PropertyCivil
Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1954; Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Rules, 1955; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 52
(2005)139PLR603
Arun Palli, Adv.
M.M. Kumar, J.1. The short question raised in this appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for brevity, 'the Code') is as to when defendant-respondent No. 1, Raghbir Singh had acquired...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBahadur Singh and anr. Vs. Avtar Singh
Punjab and Haryana
Feb-21-2007
Civil
(2007)147PLR628
Mr. Arun Palli
Vinod K. Sharma, J.1. By way of present revision petition, the petitioner have challenged the order dated 22.3.2006 passed by the learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Malerkotla, vide which the application moved by the petitioners...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Punjab Wakf Board Vs. Murti Hanuman Jai
Punjab and Haryana
Nov-05-2007
Civil
(2009)154PLR40
Mr. Arun Palli
M.M. Kumar, J.1. This appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for brevity, 'the Code') raises the following substantial question of law:Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Ranjit Kaur Vs. Chandigarh Administration and ors.
Punjab and Haryana
Aug-17-2000
Constitution
Capital of Punjab (Development and Regulation) Act, 1952 - Sections 3
AIR2001P& H105
Arun Palli, Adv.
Jawaharlal Gupta, J.1. The petitioners in these two cases have a common grievance. They complain that the respondents have arbitrarily declined their requests for the allotment of built up houses under the 'Chandigarh Allotment of Built-up...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVed Bassi Vs. Manjeet Kaur and ors.
Punjab and Haryana
Apr-07-2005
Civil
East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115 - Order 41, Rule 27 and 27(1)
(2005)140PLR563
Arun Palli and; Hemant Bassi, Advs.
M.M. Kumar, J.1. This petition has been filed under Section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, (for brevity 'the Code') for setting aside order dated 28.11.2001 passed by the Additional District Judge, Ropar, alongwith an...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPunjab Wakf Board Through Its Secretary Vs. Shri Neeko
Punjab and Haryana
Apr-21-2004
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 26, Rule 9 - Order 47, Rule 27
(2004)137PLR851
Arun Palli, Adv.
V.K. Bali, J.1. By this common order, I propose to dispose of three connected Regular Second Appeals bearing Nos. 1998, 2000 and 2001 of 1983 as the points involved in all these appeals, as conceded by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBharpur Singh and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Punjab and Haryana
May-14-1996
PropertyCivil
Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991 - Sections 2 and 4(2); Sikh Gurdawaras Act, 1925
(1996)114PLR591
Arun Palli,; R.S. Sharma and; G.C. Mittal, Advs.
Jawahar Lal Gupta, J.1. Do the provisions of the places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991 (Act 42 of 1991) render the inclusion of Gurudwaras in Schedule I to the Sikh Gurdwaras Act, 1925 and the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMadan Lal and anr. Vs. Baldev Raj
Punjab and Haryana
May-14-2004
Tenancy
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 - Sections 13(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 148
(2004)137PLR834
Arun Palli, Adv.
M.M. Kumar, J.1. This is tenants petition filed under Section 15(5) of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 (for brevity, 'the Act') challenging concurrent findings of facts recorded by both the Courts below holding...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRam Kumar @ Ramender Kumar Vs. Smt. Raksha @ Galabo
Punjab and Haryana
Mar-12-2003
Family
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 13(1); Hindu Marriage (Punjab) Rules, 1956 - Rule 10
AIR2003P& H334; I(2004)DMC347; (2003)133PLR707
Arun Palli, Adv.
Satish Kumar Mittal, J.1. Ram Kumar alias Ramender Kumar, appellant, who is the husband of Smt. Raksha alias Galabo, respondent, has filed the instant appeal against the judgment and decree dated 21.10.1999 passed by Additional District...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »