Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: arun mohan · Page 1 of about 207 results (0.068 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 17 2001

Raj Kishan Dass Vs. Mrs. Kusum Singh

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-17-2001

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Indian Trusts Act, 1882 - Sections 5, 6 and 43

Reported in : 93(2001)DLT359; 2001(60)DRJ803

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Arun Mohan, Sr. Adv. an; Mr. Samir Chug, Adv

ORDERJ.D. Kapoor, J 1. The short controversy to be settled at this stage is the determination of issue No.2 which has been framed as a preliminary issue and is as under :-'Whether a trust as alleged...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 26 1997

Om Prakash Vs. Dev Raj Kohli

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-26-1997

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14(10)

Reported in : 67(1997)DLT721; 1997(42)DRJ573; 1997RLR539

Advocate for Appellant : G.L. Rawal,; Arun Mohan and; S.P. Chug, Advs

Usha Mehra, J. (1) Petitioner has felt aggrieved because of having not been granted leave to defend the petition of eviction filed by the respondent under Section 14(1)(e) read with Section 25-B of the Delhi Rent...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 23 1980

Shashi Kapur Vs. Sulakshna Malhan and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-23-1980

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 115

Reported in : 18(1980)DLT62

Advocate for Appellant : Arun Mohan and; S.K. Khanna, Advs

Harish Chandra, J.(1) This is a revision petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure against an order dated 22nd February, 1980 of Shri K.S. Gupta, Additional Distt. Judge, Delhi, dismissing an appeal against...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 02 1976

The Oriental Bank of Commerce Ltd. Vs. Raj Kumar and Company and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-02-1976

Subject : Civil

Acts : Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 - Sections 147

Reported in : ILR1977Delhi228

Advocate for Appellant : Arun Mohan,; R.B. Datar and; Sanjeev Aggarwal, Advs

M.S. Joshi, J.(1) Gian Chand Jain purchased property built on plot No. 95, Block No. 5-C, Western Extension Area, Karol Bagh, New Delhi, at a public auction held in execution of a decree for Rs. 57,000.00...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 03 1998

Asman Investment Ltd. Vs. K.L. Suneja and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-03-1998

Subject : ContractCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order XIII, Rule 2

Reported in : 1998IIIAD(Delhi)578; AIR1998Delhi204; 72(1998)DLT286; 1998(44)DRJ791; (1998)119PLR7; 1998RLR297

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Arun Mohan, Sr. Adv. and; Mr. Rahul Roy, Adv

D.K. Jain, J. 1. This order will dispose of plaintiff's application under Order 13 Rule 2, read with section 151, CPC, seeking leave of the Court to file copies of the Resolution dated 27th June, 1989...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 11 1991

Sushila Devi Bhaskar Vs. Ishwar Nagar Cooperative House Building Socie ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-11-1991

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Delhi Co-operative Societies Act, 1972 - Sections 26

Reported in : 45(1991)DLT518

Advocate for Appellant : Arun Mohan,; Vishal Jain and; B. Mohan, Advs

S.N. Sapra, J. (1) In this writ petition, petitioner seeks to challenge the decision and directions of respondents 1 and 4, to cancel the lease of plot No. 7, Ishwar Nagar, Delhi. (2) The main question...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 24 1995

intercraft Ltd. Vs. Capital Boot House

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-24-1995

Subject : TenancyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rule 3

Reported in : 1995IIIAD(Delhi)798; 59(1995)DLT774; 1995(35)DRJ368

Advocate for Appellant : P.N. Lekhi,; G.S. Sistani,; H.P. Singh,;

S.D. Pandit, J.(1) This application is filed by the defendant under Rule 4 of Order 39, Civil Procedure Code.(2) Suit No.2199/94 is filed by the plaintiff Intercraft Ltd. to get a decree of perpetual injunction to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 11 2006

Wipro Limited Vs. Beckman Coulter International S.A.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-11-2006

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 27 and 28; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 9; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 41 and 42

Reported in : 2006(3)ARBLR118(Delhi); 2006(2)CTLJ57(Del); 131(2006)DLT681

Advocate for Appellant : Raju Ramachandran, Sr Adv.,; M.S. Vinaik,; Anjali Sharma

Badar Durrez Ahmed, J. 1. In this petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as 'the said Act'), the petitioner is seeking directions and/or orders restraining the respondent from...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 23 1995

Mahli Devi Vs. Chander Bhan and Others

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-23-1995

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 54; Delhi High Court Act, 1966 - Sections 10; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 2 and 110; Government of India Act - Sections 107 and 108; Land Acquisition Act, 1921 - Sections 26; Indian Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 39; Trade Marks Act - Sections 76

Reported in : 1995IAD(Delhi)1434; AIR1995Delhi293; 58(1995)DLT162; 1995(33)DRJ121

Advocate for Appellant : N.S. Vashisht, Adv

ORDERArun Kumar, J. 1. The question for consideration by the Full Bench is whether aLetters Patent appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent applicable to this court is maintainable in view of the provisions of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 18 1992

K. Narendra Vs. Riviera Apartments (P) Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-18-1992

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 54; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 23; Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976; Specific Performance Act - Sections 20

Reported in : 1993(25)DRJ72

Advocate for Appellant : K.S. Bindra,; Sunil Malhotra,; Arun Mohan and;

Sat Pal, J. (1) Since common question arise's in both the appeals the same are being disposed of by this common judgment. (2) While RFA(OS) 9 of 1991 is directed against the judgment and decree dated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial