Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: arun jaitley · Page 1 of about 443 results (0.094 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 19 1991

R.K. Mittal and anr. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-19-1991

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : 45(1991)DLT589; (1992)IILLJ428Del

Advocate for Appellant : Arun Jaitley,; Mukul Rohatagi,; Atul Bal,;

S.N. Sapra, J. (1) By this writ petition, filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, petitioners seek to challenge the order dated September 20,1990, (annexure A), issued by Delhi Development Authority, respondent...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 28 2007

Modi Rubber Ltd. Vs. Guardian International Corp.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-28-2007

Subject : SICA

Acts : Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 16 and 18; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 82; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 6, 6.1, 9, 11, 17, 18, 19 to 24, 25 and 36; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 27, 32, 39 and 56; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 10, 14, 14(1), 16, 21, 23, 41, 41(1) and 42; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 18, 20 and 41; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 148A - Order 38, Rule 5 - Order 39; LCIA Rules; Constitution of India - Articles 16 and 226

Reported in : 2007(2)ARBLR133(Delhi); 141(2007)DLT822

Advocate for Appellant : Arun Jaitley, Sr. Adv.,; D.S. Narula,; Anis Sharma and;

Gita Mittal, J.1. This petition raises two very interesting questions which are required to be answered. The first question raised is whether a party can seek interim relief on the ground that the other side has...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 21 2003

Aga Medical Corporation Vs. Mr. Faisal Kapadi and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-21-2003

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 13, 14, 15, 15(2) and 61; Designs Act, 1911; Patents Act; Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 2(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 479; Designs Rules, 2001; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : 2003IIAD(Delhi)351; 103(2003)DLT321; 2003(26)PTC349(Del); 2003(2)RAJ86

Advocate for Appellant : Arun Jaitley, Sr. Adv.,; Pratibha M. Singh,; Anubha and

R.C. Jain, J. 1. The above-named plaintiff has moved this application under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 read with Section 151 CPC seeking an ad-interim injunction restraining the defendants, their officers, servants, agents, promoters, dealers,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 11 1998

Urmila and Company Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Indian Farmers Fertilizers Co-operati ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-11-1998

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 20

Reported in : 1999VAD(Delhi)524; 76(1998)DLT849; 1999(50)DRJ579

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Arun Jaitley, Sr. Advocate and; Mr. Kamal Mehta, Advs

ORDERDalveer Bhandari, J.1. The plaintiffs have filed an application under Sec. 20 of the Arbitration Act for referring the disputes between the parties to the arbitration. In pursuance to the notice, a detailed reply has been...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 07 1998

Aaa Film Motion Picture Producers and anr. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-07-1998

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1999Delhi178; ILR1998Delhi763

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Arun Jaitley,; Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Senior Advocate, and;

ORDERAnil Dev Singh, J.1. These two petitions raise common questions. thereforee, both the writ petitions are being disposed of together. The first petitioner, AAA Film Motion Picture Producers, is a sole proprietary firm of the second...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 29 2008

Suraj Jit Chaudhri Vs. Cbi

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-29-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161 and 389; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302; Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 3 and 4; Hindu Marriage Act - Sections 13(1)

Reported in : 155(2008)DLT509; 2008(106)DRJ464

Advocate for Appellant : D.C. Mathur and; Arun Jaitley, Sr. Advs.,; Manisha Bhandari

B.N. Chaturvedi, J.1. Instant application, under Section 389 Cr.P.C. made by the appellant, seeks suspension of sentence inflicted on him vide impugned order of sentence dated 3.5.2008 under Sections 302 IPC and 3/4 of the Explosive...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 28 1996

Union of India Vs. Eider Electronics Industries Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-28-1996

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1996VAD(Delhi)736; 63(1996)DLT330; 1996(39)DRJ721

Advocate for Appellant : M.C. Sekharan,; Meera Bhatia,; Arun Jaitley,;

M. Jagannadha Rao, C.J.(1) These are a batch of cases. The 10 LPAs arise-out of judgment of learned Single Judge dated 2.3.1995 in two writ petitions, C.W. 3774/92 and C.W. 924/93. There is one contempt case...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 31 1998

In Re: Chandigarh Newsline (Indian Express Group)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-31-1998

Subject : Contempt of Court

Reported in : AIR1999SC144; 1998(2)ALT(Cri)244; 1999CriLJ27; JT1998(5)SC243; 1998(4)SCALE350; (1998)6SCC378; [1998]3SCR944

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Bagga and; Arun Jaitley, Senior Advs.,; P.P. Rao,;

1. Taking note a news item reading 'SC orders removal of homoeo council chief, in the Chandigarh Newsline published by the Indian Express Group, Chandigarh on 30.4.1998, this Court on May 1, 1998, being of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 25 1994

Ramesh Motiram Ramchandani Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-25-1994

Subject : Service

Reported in : 1995Supp(2)SCC139

K. Ramaswamy and; N. Venkatachala, JJ.1. This Court issued notice on 30-11-1992 on the representation that the case of the petitioner was identical to the case of V.K. Jain and he is entitled to relief granted...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 27 1998

K.K. Jerath Vs. Union Territory, Chandigarh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-27-1998

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 438

Reported in : AIR1998SC1934; 1998(1)ALD(Cri)722; 1999(1)ALT(Cri)76; 1998(2)BLJR1477; 1998CriLJ2555; JT1998(2)SC658; RLW1998(2)SC246; 1998(2)SCALE471; (1998)4SCC80

Advocate for Appellant : R.K. Jain, Sr. Adv.,; A.N. Bardiyar and; Raj Kumar Gupta, A

S. Rajendra Babu, J. 1. The petitioner filed a petition under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code for grant of bail apprehending his arrest. The High Court which had granted an interim relief earlier on...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial