Advanced Search Results

R.K. Mittal and anr. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : 45(1991)DLT589; (1992)IILLJ428Del

Advocate for Appellant : Arun Jaitley,; Mukul Rohatagi,; Atul Bal,;

S.N. Sapra, J. (1) By this writ petition, filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, petitioners seek to challenge the order dated September 20,1990, (annexure A), issued by Delhi Development Authority, respondent...

Aaa Film Motion Picture Producers and anr. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1999Delhi178; ILR1998Delhi763

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Arun Jaitley,; Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Senior Advocate, and;

ORDERAnil Dev Singh, J.1. These two petitions raise common questions. thereforee, both the writ petitions are being disposed of together. The first petitioner, AAA Film Motion Picture Producers, is a sole proprietary firm of the second...

Modi Rubber Ltd. Vs. Guardian International Corp.

Court : Delhi

Subject : SICA

Acts : Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 16 and 18; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 82; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 6, 6.1, 9, 11, 17, 18, 19 to 24, 25 and 36; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 27, 32, 39 and 56; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 10, 14, 14(1), 16, 21, 23, 41, 41(1) and 42; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 18, 20 and 41; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 148A - Order 38, Rule 5 - Order 39; LCIA Rules; Constitution of India - Articles 16 and 226

Reported in : 2007(2)ARBLR133(Delhi); 141(2007)DLT822

Advocate for Appellant : Arun Jaitley, Sr. Adv.,; D.S. Narula,; Anis Sharma and;

Gita Mittal, J.1. This petition raises two very interesting questions which are required to be answered. The first question raised is whether a party can seek interim relief on the ground that the other side has...

Aga Medical Corporation Vs. Mr. Faisal Kapadi and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 13, 14, 15, 15(2) and 61; Designs Act, 1911; Patents Act; Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 2(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 479; Designs Rules, 2001; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : 2003IIAD(Delhi)351; 103(2003)DLT321; 2003(26)PTC349(Del); 2003(2)RAJ86

Advocate for Appellant : Arun Jaitley, Sr. Adv.,; Pratibha M. Singh,; Anubha and

R.C. Jain, J. 1. The above-named plaintiff has moved this application under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 read with Section 151 CPC seeking an ad-interim injunction restraining the defendants, their officers, servants, agents, promoters, dealers,...

Urmila and Company Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Indian Farmers Fertilizers Co-operati ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 20

Reported in : 1999VAD(Delhi)524; 76(1998)DLT849; 1999(50)DRJ579

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Arun Jaitley, Sr. Advocate and; Mr. Kamal Mehta, Advs

ORDERDalveer Bhandari, J.1. The plaintiffs have filed an application under Sec. 20 of the Arbitration Act for referring the disputes between the parties to the arbitration. In pursuance to the notice, a detailed reply has been...

Suraj Jit Chaudhri Vs. Cbi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161 and 389; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302; Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 3 and 4; Hindu Marriage Act - Sections 13(1)

Reported in : 155(2008)DLT509; 2008(106)DRJ464

Advocate for Appellant : D.C. Mathur and; Arun Jaitley, Sr. Advs.,; Manisha Bhandari

B.N. Chaturvedi, J.1. Instant application, under Section 389 Cr.P.C. made by the appellant, seeks suspension of sentence inflicted on him vide impugned order of sentence dated 3.5.2008 under Sections 302 IPC and 3/4 of the Explosive...

Union of India Vs. Eider Electronics Industries Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1996VAD(Delhi)736; 63(1996)DLT330; 1996(39)DRJ721

Advocate for Appellant : M.C. Sekharan,; Meera Bhatia,; Arun Jaitley,;

M. Jagannadha Rao, C.J.(1) These are a batch of cases. The 10 LPAs arise-out of judgment of learned Single Judge dated 2.3.1995 in two writ petitions, C.W. 3774/92 and C.W. 924/93. There is one contempt case...

In Re: Chandigarh Newsline (Indian Express Group)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Contempt of Court

Reported in : AIR1999SC144; 1998(2)ALT(Cri)244; 1999CriLJ27; JT1998(5)SC243; 1998(4)SCALE350; (1998)6SCC378; [1998]3SCR944

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Bagga and; Arun Jaitley, Senior Advs.,; P.P. Rao,;

1. Taking note a news item reading 'SC orders removal of homoeo council chief, in the Chandigarh Newsline published by the Indian Express Group, Chandigarh on 30.4.1998, this Court on May 1, 1998, being of the...

Navjyoti Coo-group Housing Society Etc. Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Reported in : AIR1993SC155; JT1992(5)SC621; 1992(2)SCALE548; (1992)4SCC477; [1992]Supp1SCR709a

Advocate for Appellant : K. Madhava Reddy,; B. Prakash,; G. Prabhakar and;

ORDERG.N. Ray, J.1. Legality and validity of the policy decision of Government of India dated January 20, 1990, containing the guidelines regarding the procedure for allotment of land by the Delhi Development Authority (hereinafter referred to...

Housing Urban Development Authority and Another Vs. Kewal Krishan Goel ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Reported in : 1996IVAD(SC)548; JT1996(6)SC62; 1996(4)SCALE327; (1996)4SCC249; [1996]Supp2SCR587; 1996(2)LC287(SC); (1996)3UPLBEC1947

Advocate for Appellant : P.N. Puri, Adv

ORDERG.B. Pattanaik, J.1. Leave granted.2. In these three appeals directed against the judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court the common question of law is involved and as such are heard together and are being...