Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: arun jaitely and · Page 1 of about 52 results (0.052 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 08 1996

Franz Xaver Huemer Vs. New Yash Engineers

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-08-1996

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Patents Act, 1970 - Sections 48(2), 53, 64, 84 and 107; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 96 and 104 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : AIR1997Delhi79; 1996(25)ARBLR522(Delhi); 62(1996)DLT291; 1996(37)DRJ14; 1996RLR280

Advocate for Appellant : Arun Jaitely, Sr. Adv. and; C.M. Lall,; Ms. B. Rana and

ORDERM. Jagannadha Rao, C. J. 1. The point arising in the case is of considerable importance in regard to patents registered in India by foreigners and not kept in use in our country and thereby seriously...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 12 2006

Hotel Association of India and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-12-2006

Subject : ConstitutionExcise

Acts : Punjab Excise Act, 1914 - Sections 30; ;Equal Remuneration Act, 1976; ;Kerala Panchayat Raj Act; ;Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15 and 19(1)

Reported in : 2006(86)DRJ668

Advocate for Appellant : Arun Jaitely, Sr. Adv.,; Ravi Sikri and; V.K. Rao, Advs

Mukul Mudgal, J. 1. The petitioner No. 1 which is the Hotel Association of India and four other petitioners, two of whom are women employees in the hospitality industry have preferred this writ petition which challenges...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 17 1998

Ashok Rai Vs. M/S. Kailash Nath and Associates and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-17-1998

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : 1998VAD(Delhi)163; 1998(46)DRJ826

Advocate for Appellant : Sh. Arun Jaitely,; Sh. Rajiv Nayyar, Sr. Advocates and ; Ms

ORDERK.S. Gupta,J.1. This order will govern the disposal of I.A.No. 2742/97.2. Suit was filed, inter alia, alleging that the plaintiff, Vikram Rai and Smt. Jyotsana Sahni are the heirs of Smt. Vimla Balwant Rai who died...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 26 2011

Lalit Kumar Modi. Vs. Ch. V. Board of Control for Cricket in India, an ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-26-2011

Subject : Service

Acts : Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act, 1975. ; Bar Council Act, 1926; Andhra Pradesh Civil Services (Disciplinary Proceedings Tribunal) Rules, 1961 - Rule 4(2)

1. These three Special Leave Petitions seek to challenge three orders passed by three different benches of Bombay High Court, on the proceedings initiated by the appellant against the first respondent Board of Control for Cricket...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 11 2002

Gammon India Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-11-2002

Subject : ContractCommercial

Acts : Indian Arbitrators and Conciliation Act, 1996; ;Indian Contract Act - Sections 2 and 7

Reported in : 2003(1)ARBLR353(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : A.S. Chandhiok, Sr. Adv.,; E.R. Kumar,; Rohit Mammen Alen

A.K. Sikri, J.1. Vide NIT dated 14.12.2001 respondent No. 1 i.e. the Government of India, Ministry of defense through the Director General, Project Sea Bird invited bids for pre-qualification for the construction of Ship Lift Civil...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 05 1997

National thermal Power Corporation Ltd. Vs. Spectrum Power Generation ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-05-1997

Subject : ContractCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rule 1; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 14; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Sections 19(1)

Reported in : 1998IAD(Delhi)141; 69(1997)DLT652

Advocate for Appellant : Shanti Bhushan,; P. Bhushan,; A.B. Divan,;

K. Ramamoorthy, J. (1) The National Thermal Power Corporation Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the 'NTPC') instituted the suit on the 3rd of August, 1996 praying for the following reliefs : '(A)A decree for specific performance...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 29 2008

Allied Blenders and Distillers P. Ltd. Vs. Paul P. John and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-29-2008

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Sections 124 and 124(5); Karnataka Excise (Bottling of Liquor) Rules, 1967

Reported in : LC2008(3)371; 2008(38)PTC568(Del)

Advocate for Appellant : Sudhir Chandra and; Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advs.,; Praveen Anan

Pradeep Nandrajog, J.1. By a common order dated 11.7.2008, five applications, three applications filed in CS(OS) No. 383/2007 and two applications filed in CS(OS) No. 1058/2002 have been disposed of resulting in the appellant who was...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 30 2003

Registrar General, High Court of Sikkim Vs. Hem Lall Bhandari

Court : Sikkim

Decided on : Jun-30-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 340

Reported in : 2003CriLJ3967

Advocate for Appellant : S.P. Wangdi, Sr. Adv. assisted by; J.B. Pradhan,; Karma

ORDERN.S. Singh, Ag. C.J.1. Heard Mr. S.P. Wangdi, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. J.B. Pradhan and Mr. Karma Thinlay, Advocates for the applicant. Also heard Mr. S.K. Home Choudhury, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Mr....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 03 1995

Ajit Singh Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-03-1995

Subject : PropertyConstitution

Acts : Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957; Rajasthan Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1977 - Rules 10(2), 19(1), 24(2), 27(4), 56 and 57; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 229; Minerals Concessions Rules, 1959

Reported in : AIR1996SC475; JT1995(8)SC182; 1995(6)SCALE203; 1995Supp(4)SCC224; [1995]Supp4SCR750

Advocate for Appellant : Arun Jaitley,; A. Mariarputham,; Arun Mathurfor Arutham Aruna

ORDERS.C. Agrawal, J.1. Leave granted.2. We have heard the learned Counsel for the parties.3. This appeal relates to grant of mining lease in respect of a minor mineral, viz. marble, under the provisions of the Rajasthan...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 13 2003

People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) and Ors. Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-13-2003

Subject : ElectionConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 13, 14, 19, 19(1), 19(2), 21, 32, 145(3), 171, 171(3), 173, 324, 326, 329 and 371D; Representation of the People (Amendment) Ordinance, 2002; Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 2(1), 4, 4A, 8, 8B, 36(2), 75A, 77, 77(1), 123(5) and 124(5); Representation of the People (3rd Amendment) Act, 2002 - Sections 8(1), 8(2), 8(3), 33(1), 33A and 33B; Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation (Gujarat Amendment and Validating Provisions) Ordinance, 1969; The Ethics Reforms Act, 1989; Evidence Act - Sections 123; Karnataka Cauvery Basin Irrigation Protection Ordinance, 1991; Inter-State Water Disputes Act, 1956 - Sections 3, 5(2) and 6; West Bengal Criminal Law Amendment (Special Courts) Act, 1949; Representation of the People Rules - Rule 90; Ne

Reported in : AIR2003SC2363; JT2003(2)SC528; 2003(3)SCALE263; (2003)4SCC399; [2003]2SCR1136

Advocate for Appellant : K.N. Rawal, Additional Solicitor General,; Rajinder Sachar,; P

Shah, J.1. These writ petitions under Article 32 of the Constitution of India have been filed challenging the validity of the Representation of the People (Amendment) Ordinance, 2002 (No. 4 of 2002) ('Ordinance' for short) promulgated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial