Advanced Search Results

Brij Lal Vs. Chand Kumar

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973 - Sections 4 and 15(6)

Reported in : (1993)104PLR658

Advocate for Appellant : Arun Jain, Adv.

V.K. Jhanji, J.1. Landlord in this revision petition is impugning the finding of the Authorities below whereby fair rent of the shop was fixed at Rs. 90/- per month,. which rent the respondent was already paying...

Sarup Chand Vs. Siri Chand

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 - Sections 13(1), 13(3), 15 and 15(5); Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 25B(8); Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) -Sections 115

Reported in : (2005)140PLR726

Advocate for Appellant : Arun Jain, Adv.

M.M. Kumar, J.1. This is tenant's petition filed under Section 15(5) of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 (for brevity The Act') challenging findings of the Appellate Authority, Barnala, recorded in its order dated...

Anil K. Mehra and ors. Vs. Hans Raj

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138 and 142

Reported in : 1992CriLJ1044

Advocate for Appellant : Hemant Kumar,; Rajesh Kumar and; Rajesh Garh, Advs.

J.S. Sekhon, J. 1. Criminal Miscellaneous Nos. 11514-M, 13633-M and 13635-M of 1990 shall also be disposed of along with this miscellaneous petition (No. 13631-M of 1990), as these involve the same controversy inter partes.2. The...

Abhey Ram Vs. Miyan Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Property

Reported in : (2007)4PLR243

Vinod K. Sharma, J.1. The present Regular Second Appeal has been filed against the judgments and decrees by the learned Court below vide which the suit for specific performance filed by the plaintiff-respondent Miyan Singh was...

Babu Singh and ors. Vs. Ram Sahai @ Ram Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Family

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 68 and 69; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 63; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100

Reported in : (2006)142PLR592

Advocate for Appellant : Pritam Saini, Adv.

M.M. Kumar, J.1. This is defendants' appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for brevity, 'the Code') challenging the view taken by the learned lower Appellate Court holding that in the...

Jamuna Devi Vs. Sarbati Devi Through L.Rs.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Civil

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 64

Reported in : (2004)137PLR547

Advocate for Appellant : Arun Jain, Adv.

K.C. Gupta, J. 1. This appeal has been instituted by the defendant, Smt. Jamuna Devi, against judgment dated 8.5.1990 passed by Additional District Judge, Faridabad, whereby he set aside the judgment and order dated 4.8.1988 passed...

Rattan Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : CivilConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (1996)117PLR787

Advocate for Appellant : S.C. Kapoor, Sr. Adv. and; Arun Jain, Adv.

Jawahar Lal Gupta, J.1. The petitioner complains that the action of the respondents in allotting 'the Distributorship of Indane Gas' to Respondent No. 4 is illegal and arbitrary. He prays that the allotment be quashed and...

Shri Brij Bhusan Vs. Ram Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973 - Sections 13(2) and 15(5)

Reported in : (1994)106PLR402

Advocate for Appellant : Arun Jain, Adv.

ORDERH.S. Bedi, J.1. The present petition is directed against order of the Appellate Authority under the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973, by which the ejectment of the petitioner, who is alleged to...

Kailash Chand Vs. Anand Sarup

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973 - Sections 13(2) and 15(6)

Reported in : (1994)106PLR622

Advocate for Appellant : Arun Jain, Adv.

H.S. Bedi, J.1. The petitioner Kailash Chand rented out a piece of vacant land situated in Palwal, District Faridabad to respondent Anand Sarup. He thereafter sought the eviction of the respondent primarily on two grounds firstly,...

M/S. Jyoti Video theatre Vs. State of Haryana and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : CommercialOther Taxes

Acts : Punjab Cinemas (Regulations) Act, 1952 - Sections 2; Punjab Cinemas (Regulations) Rules, 1952 - Rule 3; Punjab Entertainment Duty Act, 1955 - Sections 3-A and 3(1); Punjab Entertainment Duty Rules, 1956 - Rules 8-A and 8(2); Constitution of India - Article 14; Haryana Act, 1989

Reported in : AIR1992P& H48

Advocate for Appellant : Arun Jain, Adv.

ORDER1. By this judgment I propose to dispose of C.W.P. Nos. 1043, 6179, 6287, 9294, 9793, 11327 of 1988; C.W.P. Nos.617, 1605, 1712, 1870, 2413, 3411, 4779, S496-A 5859, 8982 of 1989; C.W.P. Nos. 1611, 5106,...