Advanced Search Results

Sudhir Kumar JaIn S/O Late Shri Chand JaIn Vs. State of U.P. Through S ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Reported in : 2008(4)AWC3402(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Sri. Chelan Chatterji

Vineet Saran and Sabhajeet Yadav, JJ.1. Heard Sri Chelan Chatterji, learned Counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Arjun Singhal appearing for respondents No. 2 to 4. Affidavits have been exchanged between the parties and...

Brahmi Vs. District Magistrate/Deputy Director of Consolidation, Muzaf ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 - Sections 20 and 48; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 - Sections 122B(4F)

Reported in : 2002(3)AWC1848

Advocate for Appellant : Arjun Singhal, Adv.

Ashok Bhushan, J.1. Heard Sri Arjun Singhal, counsel for the petitioner, Sri Ashok Mehta, learned chief standing counsel and Sri Sanjai Goswami, learned standing counsel.2. These two writ petitions have been filed by the petitioner praying...

Mamta Mittal (Smt.) Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (2001)3UPLBEC2171

Advocate for Appellant : Arjun Singhal, Adv.

R.K. Agrawal, J.1. The petitioner, Smt. Mamta Mittal, has filed the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the order...

Mohan Wahi Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 220 and 264; Constitution of India - Article 226; Income Tax Rules - Rule 68B

Reported in : (2001)165CTR(All)72; [2000]246ITR144(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Arjun Singhal and ;R.P. Goel, Advs.

M.C. Agarwal, J.1. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner challenges an order passed by the Tax Recovery Officer confirming an auction sale of house property No. D-53/91-D situate at...

Nizam UddIn Vs. D.J. Azamgarh and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (C.P.C.) - Order XXI Rule 89

Advocate for Appellant : Wasim Alam; Arjun Singhal; Rajesh Kumar; S.T. Ali, Advs

1. In spite of sufficient service no one appeared on behalf of contesting respondents.2. Heard Sri Arjun Singhal, learned counsel for the petitioner.3. Respondent nos. 3 and 4, K.K. Maheshwari and Rukmani Sevak obtained a money...

Hari Kishan Vs. PravIn Kumar Garg and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 17, Rule 2

Reported in : 2003(2)AWC1177

Advocate for Appellant : Arjun Singhal, Adv.

A.K. Yog, J.1. Heard Sri Arjun Singhal on behalf of the plaintiff-revisionist and Sri Ram Mohan, Advocate holding brief of Sri Niraj Pandey, Advocate, learned counsel appearing for contesting defendant-respondent No. 2.2. Learned counsel for the...

Radhey Shyam Singhal Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 276C and 277; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (1996)134CTR(All)514; [1996]217ITR620(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Arjun Singhal, Adv.

1. Heard Shri Arjun Singhal for the petitioner and Shri Rakesh Ranjan Agrawal for the respondents on the question of admission.2. By this petition, the petitioner seeks a writ, order or direction in the nature of...

Ram Kumar and anr. Vs. Zila Adhikari/District Deputy Director of Conso ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 - Sections 11A, 19, 19A, 19A(2), 48(1) and 48(3); Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950

Reported in : 2002(2)AWC1577

Advocate for Appellant : N.C. Rajvanshi, ;S.C. Verma, ;Prakash Chandra, ;N.K. Srivastava, ;Arjun Singhal, ;W.H. Khan, ;H.M.B. Sinha and ;Manoj Kumar Rajvanshi, Advs.

Ashok Bhushan, J. 1. These writ petitions raise common questions of law and facts, hence they are being decided by this common judgment. Writ Petition No. 4934 of 1999 is being treated as leading writ petition....

M. Girija Vs. Kalisuresh

Court : Chennai Madurai

Subject : Land Acquisition

(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 24 of the Civil Procedure Code, to withdraw the H.M.O.P.No.99 of 2015 on the file of the Sub Court at Thoothukudi and to transfer the same to the file of the...

Sahab Ram Vs. Banarsi (Since Deceased) and Represent by Lrs.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Acts : Easement Act, 1882 - Sections 59, 61, 62, 62(1) and 65; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 100

Reported in : AIR1997All222

Advocate for Appellant : Rajesh Tandon, Adv.

1. This appeal has been filed by the plaintiff impugning the judgment and decree passed bv Vth Additional District Judge, Bulandshahr allowing Civil Appeal No. 19 of 1979 filed by the defendant-respondent whereby the suit filed...