Advanced Search Results

Balbir Singh Vs. Anokh Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115 - Order 1, Rule 10

Reported in : (2003)134PLR329

Advocate for Appellant : Arihant Jain, Adv.

M.M. Kumar, J.1. Challenge in this petition filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for brevity the Code) is to the order dated 24.1.2000 passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Patiala,...

Abdul Hamid Vs. SahibdIn Alias Sajad and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 125, 125(2), 127, 127(2), 397(3), 399, 482, 488(1), 488(2) and 489

Reported in : 1998CriLJ225

Advocate for Appellant : Arihant Jain, Adv.

ORDERR.L. Anand, J.1. Two legal propositions are going to be answered in this petition :-(i) From what point of time the order under Section 127, Cr.P.C. can be made enforceable?and(ii) Whether the petition under the garb...

Abdul Hamid Vs. Sahibdin

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : FamilyCriminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 12, 125, 125(2), 127, 397(3), 399 and 482

Reported in : II(1998)DMC10

Advocate for Appellant : Arihant Jain, Adv.

R.L. Anand, J.1. Two legal propositions are going to be answered in this petition:(i) From what point of time the order under Section 17, CPC can be made enforceable and (ii) Whether the petition under the...

Jaininder JaIn and ors. Vs. Arihant JaIn and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Arbitration Act - Sections 34 and 38; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 8, 30(2) and 30(3); Partnership Act - Sections 19; Registration Act - Sections 17(1) and 49; Transfer of Property Act; Stamp Act; Trade Mark Act - Sections 2 and 29; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : 2009(41)PTC492(Del)

Advocate for Appellant : Dushyant Dave, Sr. Adv.,; Ramesh Singh and; Navin Chawla

V.K. Jain, J.1. These Appeals are directed against the common Order dated 8.4.2009 passed in IA 2552/2004 in CS(OS) No. 155/2004, IA 2551/2004 in CS(OS) No. 156/2004, IA 2550/2004 in CS(OS ) No. 157/2004, whereby the...

Ram Nath Jindal Vs. Cit

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2001)170CTR(P& H)251

Advocate for Appellant : A.K. Mittal with Akshay Bhan, Arihant Jain & Arun Jindal, for the Assessee R.P. Sawhney with Rajesh Bindal, for the Revenue

Jawahar Lal Gupta, J.We have two references made by the Tribunal at the instance of the two assessees viz., Shri Ram Nath Jindal and Shri Jagjiwan Kumar. The basic issue is whether depreciation can be deemed...

Neel Electro Techniques and Others Vs. Neelkanth Power Solution and An ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

1 This Notice of Motion, which is tagged with Notice of Motion No.294 of 2013 in Suit No.2574/2012 and Arbitration Petition Nos. 1260 of 2013 and 1347 of 2012, both under Section 9 of the Arbitration...

Kamala Kishore vs Suncity Projects Pvt Ltd

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

$~15 & 16* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 28th March, 2026 + EX.P. 51/2024, EX.APPL.(OS) 1384/2025, EX.APPL.(OS) 436/2026 & EX.APPL.(OS) 437/2026 KAMALA KISHORE .....Decree Holder Through: Ms. Bhanita Patowary...

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd. Vs.krishna & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. M.P. Shahi, Ms. Shantha Devi Raman

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:5. h July, 2018 $~ * % 3 + MAC.APP. 595/2017 BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. M.P. Shahi, Advocate versus...

Krishna vs.bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. M.P. Shahi, Ms. Shantha Devi Raman

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:5. h July, 2018 $~ * % 3 + MAC.APP. 595/2017 BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. M.P. Shahi, Advocate versus...

“3. the Only Question in This Case Is Whether a Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Education

CRM M-31117 o”1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH CRM M-31117 of 2012 (O&M) Date of Decision: January 10, 2013 Surtaj Singh Sohi … Petitioner Versus State of Punjab … Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE...