Advanced Search Results
Sm. Pankajmi Debi and ors. Vs. Sudhir Dutta and ors.
Kolkata
Feb-02-1956
Civil
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 18 and 35; ;Tenancy Law; ;Bengal Tenancy Act, 1855 - Section 103B(5); ;Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Section 5; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 41, Rule 33
AIR1956Cal669,60CWN793
Apurbadhan Mukherjee, ;Chandidas Roy Choudhury and ;Amarnath Banerjee, Advs.
P.N. Mookerjee, J.1. This appeal is by defendants 15 to 22 and it arises out of a suit for declaration of title and partition; in the alternative, for recovery of a sum of Rs. 9,000/- by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNagendra Nath Sau Vs. Ram Krishna Sau
Kolkata
Sep-07-1959
PropertyCivil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21, Rule 102; ;Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Section 52
AIR1960Cal299,64CWN356
Apurbadhan Mukherjee and ;Nirmal Kumar Ganguly, Advs.
Banebjee, J.1. These two Rules are directed against an Order passed by the Court below, allowing two applications under Order 21 Rule 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure.2. The circumstances, in the background of which...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPanchu Vs. Hrishikesh Ghose and ors.
Kolkata
Feb-17-1959
PropertyLimitation
Hindu Law; ;Limitation Act, 1908 - Section 28 - Schedule - Article 44
AIR1960Cal446
Apurbadhan Mukherjee and ;Kashi Kanta Maitra, Advs.
B.N. Banerjee, J.1. This is a second appeal from a decree of the lower appellate court, affirming the decree of a learned Munsif.2. Plaintiff who is the appellant, brought a suit for declaration of his title...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
India Electric Works Ltd. Vs. Mrs. B.S. Mantosh and ors.
Kolkata
Jun-13-1955
PropertyCivil
Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 105 and 108; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115 and 116; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 20, Rule 12; ;Contract Act, 1872 - Section 73
AIR1956Cal148
Apurbadhan Mukherjee and ;Tarun Kumar, Advs. for Appellants in No. 77 and 79 and ;Pramatha Nath Mitra, ;Shib Krishna Dutta and ;Mrinal Kumar Ghose, Advs. for Appellatnts in Nos. 121 and 122;Amiya Kuma
Sarkar, J.1. These five appeals arising out of the same judgment in three suits tried analogously have been heard together and this judgment will govern all of them. The facts out of which these appeals have...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJayanta Mohan Chatterjee Vs. Jagat Mohan Chatterjee and ors.
Kolkata
Sep-07-1971
Trusts and SocietiesCivil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17 - Order 41, Rule 27; ;Trusts Act, 1882 - Sections 63, 64 and 66
AIR1972Cal88,76CWN127
Apurbadhan Mukherjee, ;Jyotir Lal Das and ;Ram Sankar Mazumdar, Advs.
Salil Kumar Datta, J.1. This appeal is by the plaintiff against a (judgment and decree dismissing his suit. The case of the plaintiff as stated in the plaint is as follows:--2. The grand-father of the plaintiff,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBasanta Kumar Roy Vs. Charu Chandra Pal and ors.
Kolkata
Jan-06-1958
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21, Rule 90
AIR1958Cal543,62CWN132
Apurbadhan Mukherjee and ;Gopal Chandra Narain Chowdhury, Advs.
B.N. Banerjee, J. 1. This appeal is directed against an order, dismissing an application under Order 21, Rule 90 of the Code of Civil Procedure, on the ground that applicant had no locus standi or right...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskProvakar Roy and ors. Vs. Bibhuti Bhusan Pal Choudhury and ors.
Kolkata
Aug-28-1956
Tenancy
Tenancy Law; ;Bengal Tenancy Act, 1885 - Sections 158A, 158A(2), 158A(8), 173 and 173(3); ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100 and 101; ;Limitation Act, 1908 - Section 22; ;Bengal General Clauses Act, 1899 - Section 8; ;Bengal Tenancy (Amendment) Act, 1938
AIR1957Cal177,61CWN154
Apurbadhan Mukherjee and ;Anil Kumar Sen, Advs. for ;Dwijendra Nath Mukherjee, Adv.
Lahiri, J.1. This second appeal is by the heirs of the deceased plaintiff Tarapada Roy, The facts which are relevant for the purposes of this appeal may be shortly stated as follows. One Jatindra Prosad Roy...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNanik Lal Karmarkar Vs. Shankar Lal Shah and anr.
Kolkata
Mar-08-1961
Contract
Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 51, 52 and 55; ;Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 22 and 24
AIR1962Cal103
A.D. Mukherjee and ;Nirmal Kumar Ganguly, Advs.
Banerjee, J.1. This appeal, at the instance of the defendant, is directed against an appellate decree affirming a decree for specific performance of a contract of reconveyance, passed by a learned Munsif.2. The plaintiff sold the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTinkari Sen and ors. Vs. Dulal Chandra Das and ors.
Kolkata
Dec-14-1966
Civil
High Court Rules - Rule 2; ;High Court Orders; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 35 and 151 - Order 47, Rule 1; ;West Bengal Premises Rent Control (Temporary Provisions) Act, 1950 - Sections 2(11) and 9
AIR1967Cal518
Chittatosh Mookerjee, Adv.
ORDERBijayesh Mukherji, J.1. This in an application 'for re view and/or reconsideration' of my two ordersone dated June 17, 1966 and the other dated June 22 following.2. By the first such 'order'--really it was a judgment--I...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNitya Gopal Samanta Vs. Pran Krishna Dau and ors.
Kolkata
Aug-21-1952
Civil
Partition Act, 1893 - Sections 2 and 9; ; Bengal, Agra and Assam Civil Courts Act, 1887 - Section 37(2); ; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 20, Rule 18 - Order 26, Rule 13; ; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1882 - Section 396
AIR1952Cal893,57CWN439
A.D. Mukherjee and ; Tarun Kumar Banerjee, Advs.
G.N. Das, J.1. This is an appeal by defendant 1 against a decision of Sri J. M. Bir, learned Subordinate Judge, Burdwan directing that the disputed property which consists of a tank and its banks, be...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »