Advanced Search Results

Harkesh Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302

Reported in : 2003CriLJ4181; RLW2004(2)Raj979; 2003(4)WLC522

Advocate for Appellant : Anurag Sharma, Amicus Curiae

Khem Chand Sharma, J.1. This criminal appeal by appellant Harkesh sent through, Superintendent, Central Jail, Jaipur arises out of the judgment of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Gangapur City converting the appellant for offence under Section...

Vimla Raghav (Smt.) Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 147, 149, 323, 341, 354, 427, 456 and 504; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 200 and 202

Reported in : RLW2006(2)Raj1675; 2006(3)WLC18

Advocate for Appellant : Anurag Sharma, Adv.

R.S. Chauhan, J.1. The petitioner has challenged the Order dated 5.3.2003 whereby the Civil Judge (Junior Division) & Judicial Magistrate, Todabhim had declined to take cognizance against the accused respondents Nos. 2 and 3 for the...

National Insurance Company Vs. Sua Lal Sharma and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Motor VehiclesInsurance

Reported in : 2009ACJ1686; RLW2009(1)Raj559

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Ganesh Joshi, Shri. Anurag Sharma

Mohammad Rafiq, J.1. Since both these appeals arise out of the same award passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Tonk, they were heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.2. First of...

Ram Bharosi Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 42, 42(1) and 42(2)

Reported in : 2001(3)WLC252; 2002(1)WLN402

Advocate for Appellant : Anurag Sharma and; Sanjay Sharma, Advs.

Sharma, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 27.10.99 passed by the Special Judge NDPS Act Cases and Sessions Judge, Dholpur, by which he has convicted accused appellant Ram Bharosi for offence Under Section...

Prem Kumari Vs. Sushil Kumari and ors. Etc.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Civil

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 65

Reported in : AIR2000Raj415; 2000(4)WLC239

Advocate for Appellant : Anurag Sharma, Adv.

ORDERArun Madan, J. 1. Since the defendant in the suits is one and the same and she has filed these three petitions raising common controversy, these petitions have been heard together at request and are being...

Seth Ramdayal Jat Vs. Laxmi Prasad

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CivilLimitation

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Money Lenders Act, 1934; Money Lenders Act - Sections 3 and 4; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 70; Evidence Act - Sections 40 to 43 and 58; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 380 and 454; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 145, 146 and 300; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 8, Rule 5

Reported in : AIR2009SC2463; 2009(4)AWC3673(SC); (2009)5MLJ992(SC); RLW2009(4)SC3579; 2009(5)SCALE527; (2009)11SCC545; 2009AIRSCW4587

Advocate for Appellant : Anurag Sharma, Adv. for; Prashant Kumar, Adv

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. What would be the period of limitation for institution of a suit for recovery of `pledged ornaments' is the question involved herein.3. It arises in the following factual matrix:On or about...

M/S Ansaldo Caldaie Boilers India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ano ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Companies Act, 1956

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.Harish Salve; Mr.Maninder Singh; Mr.Rajiv Bansal; Mr.Prashant Kumar; Mr.Anurag Sharma, Advs.

1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?2. To be referred to Reporters or not ?3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ?1. The writ petitioner...

Ansaldo Caldaie Boilers India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and a ... Overruled

Court : Delhi

Subject : Contract

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Advocate for Appellant : Harish Salve, Maninder Singh, Sr. Adv., Rajiv Bansal, Prashant Kumar and Anurag Sharma, Advs.

1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?2. To be referred to Reporters or not ?3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ?RAJIV SHAKDHER, J1. The...

Manish Kumar Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION(C) NO.183/2013 Manish Kumar ..Petitioner versus Union of India and others ..Respondents ORDER State of Uttar Pradesh 1. 11,376 vacant posts of Sub-Inspector of Police, are...

Sri Kirti K Mehta Vs. State Of Karnataka By

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

1 R Reserved on :18. 09.2024 Pronounced on :21. 10.2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE21T DAY OF OCTOBER, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION No.6658 OF2024C/W...