Advanced Search Results

Ram Murat S/O Shri Santoo Vs. Commissioner, Azamgarh Division,

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Election

Acts : Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3 and 5; Uttar Pradesh General Clauses Act, 1904 - Sections 2(14) and 24; Uttar Pradesh Scheduled Commodities (Regulation of Distribution) Order, 1990 - Sections 3 and 4; Uttar Pradesh Scheduled Commodities Distribution (Amendment) Order, 2004 - Sections 21, 27 and 28

Reported in : 2006(4)AWC3419

Advocate for Appellant : Ram Ravat, ;S.K. Singh, ;S.D. Dubey, ;Manoj Misra, ;R.J. Misra, ;J.P. Gupta, ;Deepak Jaiswal, ;Devendra Kumar, ;D.R. Azad, ;S.M. Iqbal, ;Irshad Ali, ;Rajendra Singh, ;Sufia Saba and ;Jyoti Bhushan, Ad

R.K. Rastogi, J.1. The petitioners in all these 32 writ petitions were licensees of the fair price shops. Their licences have been cancelled on the ground that either they themselves or their wives or other family...

Dhruv Chand and ors. Vs. State and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 406 and 498A

Reported in : II(2008)DMC695

Advocate for Appellant : Anuj Kumar Garg, Adv

Sunil Gaur, J.1. Petitioner No. 1 is the husband and petitioner No. 3 is mother- in-law of the complainant. They are present in person. Mr. Anuj Kumar Garg, learned Counsel for all the eight petitioners states...

Zee Entertainment Enterprises Ltd. Vs. Mr. Gajendra Singh and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 14, 17 and 55(1); Factories Act; Copyright Act, 1914 - Sections 5; Copyright Act, 1911; Workmen's Compensation Act; Evidence Act - Sections 40 to 42 and 43; Dramatic Copyright Act, 1833

Reported in : 2007(6)ALLMR532; 2007(6)BomCR700; (2007)109BOMLR2072; 2008BusLR161(Bom); LC2007(3)299; 2008(36)PTC53(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Janak Dwarkadas, Sr. Adv., ;Rahul Chitnis, ;Ankit Lohia and ;Ranjit Shetty, Advs., i/b., PDS Legal

S.J. Vazifdar, J.1. Defendant No. 2 is one Ms.Karuna Raju Samtani and Defendant No. 3 is Star (India) Limited.2. The suit is filed for a perpetual injunction restraining the Defendants from infringing the Plaintiff's copyright in...

Onkar Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 11 and 184; Navy (Ceremonial Conditions of Service and Miscellaneous Provision) Regulations, 1963 - Regulations 268(1) and 269; Navy Service Pension and Gratuity Pension Regulations (Navy), 1964 - Regulations 78 and 79

Reported in : 2002(2)BomCR247

Advocate for Appellant : M.N. Bhatkal, ;P.L. Naik and ;Shyam Mehta, Advs., i/b., ;Satendra Kumar, Adv. in W.P. No. 2289 of 2000

A.P. Shah, J.1. These writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution involve common question relating to the right to receive pension and since this question is common to all the writ petitions, they are being...

Union of India and Others Vs. R.P. Yadav

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ServiceContract

Acts : Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 3(20), 11, 14(1), 15, 16, 17, 18, 41 and 184(1); Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; Contract Act - Sections 18, 19; Indian Contract Act, 1982 - Sections 18(1)

Reported in : AIR2000SC2252; JT2000(6)SC371; 2000(4)SCALE600; (2000)5SCC325; [2000]Supp1SCR196; (2000)3UPLBEC2174

D.P. Mohapatra, J. 1. Leave granted.2. The question that arises for determination in these appeals is whether an Artificer Apprentice of Indian Navy who has been given a re-engagement for a certain period after obtaining his...

Mr. Sarabjit Singh Sahi Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 16; Navy Service Pension and Gratuity Pension Regulations, 1964 - Regulations 78, 217 and 218; Contact Act - Sections 19

Reported in : 2002(62)DRJ800

Advocate for Appellant : Vineet Bhagat, Adv

Vikramajit Sen, J.1. In these Petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution it has been prayed that a writ of Mandamus be issued directing the Respondents to release the Petitioner immediately, with full terminal benefits including...

Mahender Yadav vs.central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Vikram Panwar, Mr. Vikas Walia, Mr. Suyash Sinha

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAHENDER YADAV CRL.A. 715/2013 Through: Mr. Vikram Panwar, Advocate with Mr. Vikas Walia and Mr. Suyash Sinha, Advocates. ..... Appellant versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF...

State Through Cbi vs.sajjan Kumar & Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. R. S. Cheema, Mr. D. P. Singh, Ms. Tarannum Cheema, Ms. Hiral Gupta, Mr. Manu Mishra, Ms. Smrithi Suresh, Mr. H. S. Phoolka, Ms. Kamna Vohra, Ms. Shilpa Dewan, Mr. Jarnail Mr. Gurbaksh Singh, Ms. Jasleen Chahal

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + STATE THROUGH CBI CRL.A. 1099/2013 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. R. S. Cheema, Sr. Advocate with Mr. D. P. Singh, Ms. Tarannum Cheema, Ms. Hiral...

Capt. Bhagmal Retd. Vs.cbi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. R. N. Sharma

$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 851/2013 & CRL.M.A. 6605/2018 CAPT. BHAGMAL RETD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. R. N. Sharma, Advocate CBI versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. R. S....

Balwan Khokhar vs.cbi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Mr. Rakesh Vats, Mr. Jeetin Jhala

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 861/2013 & CRL.M.B. 1406/2018 + BALWAN KHOKHAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rakesh Vats, Advocate and Mr. Jeetin Jhala,...