Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: anoop singh · Page 1 of about 350 results (0.093 seconds)

Oct 19 1976

Jugmug Electric and Radio Co. Vs. Telerad Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-19-1976

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade & Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 11

Reported in : AIR1977Delhi252; ILR1977Delhi295; 1977RLR131

Advocate for Appellant : Anoop Singh and;N.K. Anan

B.C. Misra, J.(1) This first appeal under section 109(6) of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 43 of 1958, (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') has been filed by the appellants against the order of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 26 1967

Drugdeal Corporation Vs. Smith

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-26-1967

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 21, Rule 32

Reported in : 4(1968)DLT313

Advocate for Appellant : A.R.Wig,; K.G.Sapra and; Anoop Singh, Advs

ORDER21 rule 32 only prescribes the mode for the execution of a decree for injnction. If a court is moved to enforce execution of the decree under this provisn of law the application must be made...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 23 1979

Mohan MeakIn Breweries Ltd. Vs. the Scotch Whisky Association

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-23-1979

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 2(1)

Reported in : 17(1980)DLT466

Advocate for Appellant : B.C. Chadha and; Anoop Singh, Advs

O.N. Vohra, J.(1) The short point that arises for determination in this appeal is whether the brand name 'Highland Chief used in relation to the product described as 'Malted Whisky' along with a device of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works

Nov 21 1980

B. Chawla and Sons Vs. Bright Auto Industries

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-21-1980

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Patents and Designs Act, 1911 - Sections 5(2)

Reported in : AIR1981Delhi95; 19(1981)DLT323; 1981RLR373

Advocate for Appellant : K.L. Aggarwal and; Anoop Singh, Advs

O.N. Vohra, J.(1) The short point arising in this appeal against the judgment dated December 24, 1976 of M. S. Joshi, J. is : Whether the design of M/s. B. Chawla & Sons, hereinafter referred to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 11 1986

E.R. Squibb and Sons Inc. Vs. Curewel India Limited

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-11-1986

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1987Delhi197; ILR1986Delhi362

Advocate for Appellant : Anoop Singh,; H.P. Singh,; Manmohan Singh and;

C. Goel, J.(1) The plaintiff, E. R. Squibb & Sons Inc. filed this suit against the defendant, Curewel (India) Ltd. for a permanent injunction against the defendant restraining it from selling in any manner its product...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 20 1985

Ravinder Kumar Gupta Vs. Ravi Raj Gupta and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-20-1985

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Design Act, 1911 - Sections 51A

Reported in : 1986(1)ARBLR473(Delhi); 29(1986)DLT190; 1986RLR93

Advocate for Appellant : Anoop Singh,; U.P. Singh,; Manmohan Singh,;

D.P. Wadhwa, J. (1) This is a petition under section 51-A of the Designs Act, 1911 (for short the 'Act') for cancellation of design No. 150873 in class 4by the Controller of Patents and Designs who...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 04 1978

Sham Lal Vs. Interads Advertising (P) Ltd. and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-04-1978

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : AIR1978Delhi270

Advocate for Appellant : Anoop Singh, Adv

ORDER1. Shri Sham Lal, plaintiff, has alleged that he is trading as M/s. Anil & Co. since 10th May, 1965 and doing business as manufacturer of artist and paint brushes. Defendant No. 1 is stated to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 07 2004

Shakti NaraIn Singh Vs. Anoop Singh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-07-2004

Subject : ContractConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : 2004(3)AWC2046; (2004)3UPLBEC2444

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Gupta, Adv.

M. Katju, J.1. This appeal has been filed against the impugned order dated 27.2.2004 passed by the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Banda.2. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and have carefully perused the impugned...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 05 1971

Baljit Kumar, Trading as Grand Foundry, Punjab Vs. Ram Saroop and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-05-1971

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 56(2)

Reported in : AIR1972Delhi153

Advocate for Appellant : N.K. Anand, Adv

1. This appeal under Section 109 of the Trade an Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed in the following circumstances:Baljit Kumar-appellant was allotted factory No.77 situated on G.T.Road, Batala,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 14 1976

Lachhman Das Bihari Lal Vs. Bhagwan Dass Etc

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-14-1976

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade & Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 46

Reported in : AIR1977Delhi200; ILR1977Delhi327

Advocate for Appellant : Anoop Singh and; N.K. Anand, Advs

B.C. Misra, J. (1) This first appeal has been filed under sec- corporation 109(6) of the Trade & Merchandize Marks Act, 43 of 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). It is directed against the order...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

Try free for 7 days

‹ Prev
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Next ›
Last »

Advanced Search Results

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.