Advanced Search Results

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Smt. Savita Sen and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Labour and IndustrialCivil

Acts : Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 30(1)

Reported in : 2004ACJ2134; [2004(102)FLR927]; (2004)IIILLJ250MP; 2004(3)MPHT7; 2004(2)MPLJ445

Advocate for Appellant : N.S. Ruprah, ;Rakesh Jain and ;Anoop Nair, Advs.;Narendra Chouhan, Adv. for Claimnants, ;Rajendra Tiwari and ;A.G. Dhande, Sr. Advs., ;P.D. Gupta, Dy. Adv. General and ;Naman Nagrath, Adv. (Amicus Cu

ORDERRajeev Gupta, J.1. These matters have been placed before us on a Reference by a Division Bench of this Court for decision on the following question of law :--'Whether the third proviso to Section 30(1), of...

Allahabad Bank and ors. Vs. Surendra Kumar Mishra

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Service

Acts : Allahabad Bank (Employees) Pension Regulations, 1993

Reported in : (2003)IILLJ373MP; 2003(1)MPLJ574

Advocate for Appellant : Anoop Nair, Adv.

S.L. Jain, J. 1. Being aggrieved by the order dated December 5, 2001 passed by the learned single Judge in Writ Petition No. 4060 of 2001 (since reported in 2002(2) MPLJ 395, appellants have preferred this...

Ram Shankar Namdeo. Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh.

Court : Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Shri Anoop Nair, Adv.

1. Shri Anoop Nair, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri V. S. Shroti, learned senior counsel with Shri Amalpushp Shroti, learned counsel for the respondents. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, matter is...

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Poorti Metal Industries

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : ArbitrationLimitation

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 5, 17, 30, 33, 39 and 39(1); Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 4 to 24 and 29(2) - Schedule - Article 119; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 34 and 34(3); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 17 and 115 - Order 9, Rules 6 and 13

Reported in : 2005(2)MPHT199; 2005(2)MPLJ474

Advocate for Appellant : Anoop Nair, Adv.

ORDERDipak Misra, J.1. In this appeal preferred under Section 39 of the Indian Arbitration Act, 1940 (for brevity, 'the Act'), the appellant has called in question the judgment and decree dated 7-5-2001 passed by the learned...

Grasim Cement Vs. Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : ElectricityCivil

Acts : Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 49

Reported in : AIR2004MP176; 2004(3)MPLJ231

Advocate for Appellant : Kishore Shrivastava, Adv.

Dipak Misra, J.1. In this appeal preferred under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent the appellant has called in question the pregnability and penetrability of the order dated 30-4-1997 passed by the learned single Judge in...

Y.P.Rai Vs. M.P.State Electricity Board

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. K.N. Pethia

1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : JABALPUR WRIT PETITION No.15515/2006 Y.P. Rai Vs. Madhya Pradesh State Electricity Board & others ____________________________________________________________ Present : Hon’ble Shri Justice K.K. Trivedi ____________________________________________________________ Shri K.N. Pethia, learned Counsel for...

Upendra Kumar Kaliya Vs. South Eastern Coal Fields Limited

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Satish Shrivastava, Mr. D.K. Dixit, Mr. Vikas Mishra, Mr. Shailendra Verma, Mr. P.S. Tomar, Mr. Sunil Singh Sengar, Mr. Gajendra Tamsikar, Mr. V.K. Shukla, Mr. Pushpendra Yadav, Mr. Manot Chandurkar, Mr. Jitendra Tiwari, Mr. G.S. Gaharwar

Review Petition No.986/2012 01.03.2013 Mr. Satish Shrivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. K.B. Bhatnagar, learned counsel for the respondents. Heard on I.A. No.14613/2012, an application for condonation of delay. For the reasons assigned in the...

Narmada Prasad Tiwari Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement Given ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Right to Information

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. J.L.Soni

1 W.P.No.15557/2012 13.1.2014 Shri L.S.Singh, learned senior counsel with Shri J.L.Soni, learned counsel for the petitioner. Ms.V.Shrivastava, Panel Lawyer for the State of M.P.Shri Anoop Nair, learned counsel with Shri K. Rohan, learned counsel for respondents...

Arun Kumar Bhowmik Vs. Union of India

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADEESH JABALPUR (Writ Petition No.482/2008) Arun Kumar Bhowmick & others Vs. Union of India and others Counsel for Petitioners Shri Akash Choudhary, Advocate Counsel for respondent Union of India Shri Anoop Nair,...

Achutanand Dwivedi Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. V.P.Singh, Shri. Parag S. Chaturvedi, Shri. B.K.Bajpai, Shri. Ajay Sen, Shri. Jaideep Sirpurkar, Shri. Satish Agrawal, Shri. Sanjay Kumar Patel, Shri. R.K.Verma, Shri. Sanjay Patel, Shri. Arun Pandey, Shri. D.K.Dixit, Shri. Amit Seth

W.A.No.61/2013 18.02.2013 Shri V.P.Singh, learned counsel for the appellant. Shri Vijay Pandey, learned Deputy Advocate General for the respondents 1 to 4 on advance copy. Ms.Saroj Daharia, learned counsel for the respondent no.7. The appellant is...