Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: anoop choudhari · Page 1 of about 31 results (0.099 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 28 1991

Satendra Prakash Agarwal Vs. State Bank of Indore, Bhopal and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-28-1991

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rule 6

Reported in : 1991(0)MPLJ951

Advocate for Appellant : Anoop Choudhary, Adv.

R.D. Shukla, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 27-1-1989 of District Judge, Bhopal passed in Civil Suit No. 109-A/ 87, whereby in an application of the plaintiff under Order 39, Rules...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 15 1999

Dr. (Mrs.) Sandhya JaIn Vs. Dr. Subhash Garg and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-15-1999

Subject : Service

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Medical Education(Gazetted) Service Recruitment Rules, 1987 - Rules 5, 6, 13, 14 and 15; Constitution of India - Articles 16 and 309; Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985 - Sections 9

Reported in : AIR2000SC29; JT1999(8)SC321; 2000(1)MPHT617; 1999(6)SCALE588; (1999)8SCC449; [1999]Supp4SCR12; 2000(2)SLJ92(SC); 2000(1)LC267(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Harish N. Salve,; Sushil Kumar Jain and; A.P. Dhamija, Advs

G.B. Pattanaik, J.1. These appeals are directed against the Judgment dated 5.9.95 of the Madhya Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Indore Bench in O.A. No. 213 of 1995. The appellant in each of these appeals was respondent in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 27 1999

Mahesh Balmiki @ Manna Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-27-1999

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 300, 302, 304, 324 and 326

Reported in : AIR1999SC3338; 2000(1)ALD(Cri)108; 1999(2)ALT(Cri)339; 1999CriLJ4301; JT1999(6)SC279; 1999(5)SCALE237; (2000)1SCC319; 1999(2)LC1402(SC)

ORDERSyed Shah Mohammed Quadri, J.1. Leave is granted limited to the question of nature of offence.2. The appellant along with two others was tried for committing murder of one Satish (hereinafter referred to as 'the deceased')...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 11 2010

J. Kodanda Rami Reddy Vs. State of A.P. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-11-2010

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 8(2), 14(2), 30, 33

1.The first respondent (State of A.P.) entered into an agreement dated 22.6.1987 in regard to execution of the work "Ongole Water Supply Improvement Scheme with NS canals as a source" in pursuance of acceptance of appellant's...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 14 1974

The State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Ramesh Nai and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-14-1974

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1975CriLJ713

P.K. Tare, C.J.1. This order shall govern the disposal of both the cases mentioned above. These are references under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 1898, made bv the Fourth Additional Sessions Judge, Jabalpur,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 20 2002

Bibhudatta Mohanty Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-20-2002

Subject : Service

Reported in : AIR2002SC1503; [2002(93)FLR915]; JT2002(3)SC438; 2002LabIC1448; 2002(3)SCALE64; (2002)4SCC16; [2002]2SCR613; 2002(2)SCT545(SC); 2002(3)SLJ9(SC); (2002)2UPLBEC1288

Advocate for Appellant : Monoj K. Das and; Sibo Sankar Mishra, Advs

Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri, J.1. Leave is granted.2. These appeals are from the judgment and order of the Division Bench of the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack in O.J.C.No.8733 of 2000 dated September 12, 2000...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 07 2002

K.R. Deharia Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-07-2002

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16 and 226; Service and Labour Law

Reported in : [2002(93)FLR307]; JT2002(2)SC393; (2002)2UPLBEC1463

1. The legality of the impugned order of reversion of the appellant from the post of OS grade II by order dated 30th August, 1996 is the subject matter of challenge in this appeal. The brief...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 05 2001

C.B.i., A.H.D., Patna Vs. Braj Bhushan Prasad and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-05-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000 - Sections 89 and 89(1); Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 3(1), 4, 4(2), 13 and 13(1); Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 5(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 178 to 180 and 181(4); Minnesota Constitution - Sections 1 - Schedule - Article 9; Negotiable Instruments Act - Sections 138

Reported in : 2001VIIIAD(SC)356; AIR2001SC4014; 2001CriLJ4683; JT2001(8)SC348; 2001(6)SCALE641; (2001)9SCC432

Advocate for Appellant : Harish N. Salve, Solicitor General,; Kapil Sibal, P.S. Mishra,;

Thomas, J.1. Leave granted.2. The question is short but the range of consideration got widened much. Answer to the question may be of advantage to some accused and disadvantage to some other accused who are involved...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 13 2011

Cellular Operators Association of India and Others Vs. Department of T ...

Court : Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TDSAT

Decided on : Apr-13-2011

Subject : Service Tax

Advocate for Appellant : For Petitioner: Mr. Ramji Srinivasan, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Manjul Bajpai, Advocate. For Respondent No.1: Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Advocate, For Respondent No.2 (BSNL): Mr. Maninder Singh, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Tej

S.B. SINHA INTRODUCTION Validity of an order/determination passed/issued by Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) vis-à-vis the Regulations framed by it is in question in this petition. BACKGROUND FACTS 2. The first petitioner is an Association...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 29 2004

Lacchman Singh Vs. State of H.P. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-29-2004

Subject : Property

Acts : Himachal Pradesh Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1972 - Sections 3, 6, 8, 9, 9(2) and 10; Himachal Pradesh Ceiling on Land Holdings Rules, 1973 - Rules 4, 6, 8, 9 and 10; Himachal Pradesh Tenancy and Land Reforms Act, 1972; Constitution of India - Article 136

Reported in : 2004(2)SCALE70; (2004)9SCC271

Advocate for Appellant : Naresh K. Sharma,; E.C. Agrawala,; Padam Dev Goverdhan,;

Shivaraj V. Patil J. 1. The Himachal Pradesh Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1972 (for brevity 'the Act') came into force on 22.11.1973. A draft statement was served on 24.3.1975 on the appellant by the Collector...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial