Advanced Search Results
Satendra Prakash Agarwal Vs. State Bank of Indore, Bhopal and anr.
Madhya Pradesh
Aug-28-1991
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rule 6
1991(0)MPLJ951
Anoop Choudhary, Adv.
R.D. Shukla, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 27-1-1989 of District Judge, Bhopal passed in Civil Suit No. 109-A/ 87, whereby in an application of the plaintiff under Order 39, Rules...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr. (Mrs.) Sandhya JaIn Vs. Dr. Subhash Garg and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Oct-15-1999
Service
Madhya Pradesh Medical Education(Gazetted) Service Recruitment Rules, 1987 - Rules 5, 6, 13, 14 and 15; Constitution of India - Articles 16 and 309; Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985 - Sections 9
AIR2000SC29; JT1999(8)SC321; 2000(1)MPHT617; 1999(6)SCALE588; (1999)8SCC449; [1999]Supp4SCR12; 2000(2)SLJ92(SC); 2000(1)LC267(SC)
Harish N. Salve,; Sushil Kumar Jain and; A.P. Dhamija, Advs
G.B. Pattanaik, J.1. These appeals are directed against the Judgment dated 5.9.95 of the Madhya Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Indore Bench in O.A. No. 213 of 1995. The appellant in each of these appeals was respondent in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMahesh Balmiki @ Manna Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Supreme Court of India
Aug-27-1999
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 300, 302, 304, 324 and 326
AIR1999SC3338; 2000(1)ALD(Cri)108; 1999(2)ALT(Cri)339; 1999CriLJ4301; JT1999(6)SC279; 1999(5)SCALE237; (2000)1SCC319; 1999(2)LC1402(SC)
ORDERSyed Shah Mohammed Quadri, J.1. Leave is granted limited to the question of nature of offence.2. The appellant along with two others was tried for committing murder of one Satish (hereinafter referred to as 'the deceased')...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
J. Kodanda Rami Reddy Vs. State of A.P. and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Nov-11-2010
Arbitration
Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 8(2), 14(2), 30, 33
1.The first respondent (State of A.P.) entered into an agreement dated 22.6.1987 in regard to execution of the work "Ongole Water Supply Improvement Scheme with NS canals as a source" in pursuance of acceptance of appellant's...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Ramesh Nai and anr.
Madhya Pradesh
Oct-14-1974
Criminal
1975CriLJ713
P.K. Tare, C.J.1. This order shall govern the disposal of both the cases mentioned above. These are references under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 1898, made bv the Fourth Additional Sessions Judge, Jabalpur,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBibhudatta Mohanty Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Mar-20-2002
Service
AIR2002SC1503; [2002(93)FLR915]; JT2002(3)SC438; 2002LabIC1448; 2002(3)SCALE64; (2002)4SCC16; [2002]2SCR613; 2002(2)SCT545(SC); 2002(3)SLJ9(SC); (2002)2UPLBEC1288
Monoj K. Das and; Sibo Sankar Mishra, Advs
Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri, J.1. Leave is granted.2. These appeals are from the judgment and order of the Division Bench of the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack in O.J.C.No.8733 of 2000 dated September 12, 2000...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK.R. Deharia Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Feb-07-2002
Service
Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16 and 226; Service and Labour Law
[2002(93)FLR307]; JT2002(2)SC393; (2002)2UPLBEC1463
1. The legality of the impugned order of reversion of the appellant from the post of OS grade II by order dated 30th August, 1996 is the subject matter of challenge in this appeal. The brief...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskC.B.i., A.H.D., Patna Vs. Braj Bhushan Prasad and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Oct-05-2001
Criminal
Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000 - Sections 89 and 89(1); Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 3(1), 4, 4(2), 13 and 13(1); Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 5(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 178 to 180 and 181(4); Minnesota Constitution - Sections 1 - Schedule - Article 9; Negotiable Instruments Act - Sections 138
2001VIIIAD(SC)356; AIR2001SC4014; 2001CriLJ4683; JT2001(8)SC348; 2001(6)SCALE641; (2001)9SCC432
Harish N. Salve, Solicitor General,; Kapil Sibal, P.S. Mishra,;
Thomas, J.1. Leave granted.2. The question is short but the range of consideration got widened much. Answer to the question may be of advantage to some accused and disadvantage to some other accused who are involved...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCellular Operators Association of India and Others Vs. Department of T ...
Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TDSAT
Apr-13-2011
Service Tax
For Petitioner: Mr. Ramji Srinivasan, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Manjul Bajpai, Advocate. For Respondent No.1: Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Advocate, For Respondent No.2 (BSNL): Mr. Maninder Singh, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Tej
S.B. SINHA INTRODUCTION Validity of an order/determination passed/issued by Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) vis-à-vis the Regulations framed by it is in question in this petition. BACKGROUND FACTS 2. The first petitioner is an Association...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLacchman Singh Vs. State of H.P. and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Jan-29-2004
Property
Himachal Pradesh Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1972 - Sections 3, 6, 8, 9, 9(2) and 10; Himachal Pradesh Ceiling on Land Holdings Rules, 1973 - Rules 4, 6, 8, 9 and 10; Himachal Pradesh Tenancy and Land Reforms Act, 1972; Constitution of India - Article 136
2004(2)SCALE70; (2004)9SCC271
Naresh K. Sharma,; E.C. Agrawala,; Padam Dev Goverdhan,;
Shivaraj V. Patil J. 1. The Himachal Pradesh Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1972 (for brevity 'the Act') came into force on 22.11.1973. A draft statement was served on 24.3.1975 on the appellant by the Collector...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »