Advanced Search Results
Sau. Sushama W/O Pramod Taksande Vs. Shri Pramod S/O Ramaji Taksande
Mumbai
Mar-17-2009
Family
Hindu Marriage Act - Sections 13(B), 23, 23(1), 28 and 28(1); Right to Information Act (RTI); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 96 and 96(3) - Order 23, Rule 3 - Order 41, Rule 25
AIR2009Bom111; 2009(3)BomCR753; 2009(111)BomLR1804; 2009(4)MhLj81
R.D. Bhuibar, Adv.
B.P. Dharmadhikari, J.1. The appellant before this Court is wife and she challenges judgment dated 6.12.2008 delivered by the District Judge -I, Pandharkawada, affirming the judgment dated 6.10.2008 passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pandharkawada...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJolly Brothers Private Limited, a Company Incorporated Under the Provi ...
Mumbai
Apr-26-2007
Tenancy
Companies Act, 1956; Rent Control Act; Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1947 - Sections 13, 13(1), 13(2) and 13(3); Uttar Pradesh Cantonments (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1952 - Sections 14
2007(3)ALLMR736; 2007(4)BomCR171
Anjan De, Adv.
A.B. Chaudhari, J.1. By the present writ petitions, the petitioners have challenged the judgment and order dated 24.2.1995 in Revenue Appeal No. 4/71 (2)/94-95-Amravati, passed by the Additional Collector, Amravati, by which the Appellate Authority under...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKu. Saroj Pundlikrao Datir Vs. Dr. Prakash Nandurkar, Secretary, Satch ...
Mumbai
Aug-04-2009
Contempt of Court
Contempt of Courts Act - Sections 10, 12 and 20; Constitution of India - Article 215; M.E.P.S. Act - Sections 13
2009(5)BomLR13; 2009(6)MhLj235
Anjan De, Adv.
S.R. Dongaonkar, J.1. Heard Shri Anjan De, Advocate, for the petitioner, Shri Suresh Dhole, Advocate, for Respondent Nos. 1 & 2 and Shri P.D. Kothari, AGP, for Respondent Nos. 3 & 4. 2. The petitioner has...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Ku. Priyanka Kamlesh Shukla Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.
Mumbai
Feb-13-1996
Constitution
Admission to Medical Courses Rules - Rules 4.1.1, 7.0.1, 8.0.4.1, 8.2.1.1, 8.4.6 and 8.4.5
1996(5)BomCR556
Anjan De, Adv.
R.K. Batta, J.1. The petitioner passed XIIth Standard examination from Maharashtra State Board of Secondary and Higher Secondary Education, Nagpur Divisional Board in March 1993, securing 422 marks out of 600 marks. She had obtained 218...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMurtuzakhan Mahabobkhan Since Deceased Through L.Rs. Rashida Begum and ...
Mumbai
Apr-03-2002
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 38, Rule 5 and 5(1)
2002(4)ALLMR499; 2002(4)BomCR530; (2002)3BOMLR949; 2002(3)MhLj399
Anjan De, Adv.
D.D. Sinha, J.1. Heard Shri Anjan De, learned Counsel for the applicant, and Shri Naik, learned Counsel for the non-applicant.2. In the present revision, order dated 25-10-1994 passed by the 2nd Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMunicipal Council Vs. Sanjay Dhanraj Yenorkar
Mumbai
May-04-2007
Labour and Industrial
Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 10, 11, 28 and 33; Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995; Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 7; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 41, Rule 23A; Uttar Pradesh State Industrial Tribunal Standing Orders, 1951 - Rule 4C; Constitution of India - Article 227
2007(4)ALLMR700; 2008(2)BomCR910; 2007(4)MhLj258
Anjan De, Adv.
A.B. Chaudhari, J.1. Rule returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of parties.2. By the present petition, the petitioner has questioned the validity of judgment and order dated 15-4-2005 in Complaint U.L.P. No. 316/2000, passed by the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMahadeo Rama Vaidya and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.
Mumbai
May-06-2008
CivilLimitation
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 4(1), 6, 9, 12(2), 18, 23, 24, 51A and 54; Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation Act, 1961 - Sections 3(2), 32, 32(1), 32(2), 32(3), 33, 33(3), 33(5), 34, 34(1) and 34(2)
2008(5)ALLMR342; 2008(6)BomCR463; 2008(6)MhLj659
Anjan De and ;K. Satpute, Advs. in F.A. Nos. 961 to 965, 971, 1003, 1005, 1006 and 1007/2007 and ;M.M. Agnihotri, Adv. in F.A. No. 349, 350, 351, 352, 476/2008 and in C.Appln. No. 8595/2007 in F.A. ST
Dharmadhikari B.P., J.1. Parties had stated that all these Appeals under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as 1894 Act) are connected and can be decided together finally at the stage of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMrs. Cynthia MartIn Wd/O A.V. MartIn Vs. Prembehari S/O Makhanlal Yadu ...
Mumbai
Apr-30-1997
Property
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 9, 11, 47, 144 and 151 - Order 21, Rule 35 - Order 41, Rule 27; Maharashtra Slum-Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971 - Sections 2, 21, 22(1), 42 and 46; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 61
1997(3)ALLMR289; 1998(1)BomCR631; 1997(3)MhLj389
Anjan De, Adv.
ORDERV.S. Sirpurkar, J. 1. The Civil Revision was admitted and heard on 30th April, 1997. On that day, the civil revision was rejected. Following are the reasons for the rejection. It will be better to see...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGanesh S/O. Mahadeorao Thawre Vs. Central Hindu Military Education Soc ...
Mumbai
Jul-26-2007
Civil
Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Act, 1977 - Sections 2(12); Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 - Sections 9, 17, 22, 22A, 22(3) and 28; Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Rules, 1981 - Rule 36 and 36(2)
2008(1)ALLMR105; 2007(5)BomCR680; 2007(6)MhLj589
Anjan De, Adv.
R.C. Chavan, J.1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith and is heard by consent of the parties.2. Petitioner, Head Master of Bhonsla Military School, Nagpur, has challenged decision of respondent management to conduct an enquiry into...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShah Velji Narsee Vs. Vasantrai Umiyashankar Pandya and anr.
Mumbai
Mar-03-2003
CommercialCivil
Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 69(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 30, Rule 1
2003(4)ALLMR1054; 2004(2)BomCR352; 2003(3)MhLj979
Priya Sharma, Adv. holding for ;Anjan De, Adv.
V.M. Kanade, J. 1. This Second Appeal has been filed by the original plaintiff challenging the Judgment and Order passed by the 5th Additional District Judge, Amravati, who had confirmed the Judgment and Decree passed by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »