Advanced Search Results

Anil Shrivastava Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Dinesh Upadhyay

Anil Shrivastava versus State W.P.No.12904/2012 24/08/2012 Shri Dinesh Upadhyay, learned counsel for the petitioner. Issue notice to the respondents on payment of P.F within one week, returnable in four weeks. Considering the fact that the petitioner...

Jairam Das Wadhwani Vs. Anil Shrivastava Judgement Given By: Hon'ble S ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Rajesh Panjwani

C.P.No.2533/2013 (J.D.Wadhwani versus Anil Shrivastava and another) 02.01.2014 Heard Shri Rajesh Panjwani, learned counsel for the petitioner on the question of admission. The petitioner has filed this application alleging non- compliance and disobedience of the order...

Union of India (Uoi) Through General Manager, North Eastern Railway Vs ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 2008ACJ2533

U.K. Dhaon and Narayan Shukla, JJ.1. Heard Mr. Anil Shrivastava, the learned Counsel for the appellant and Mr. Jaspreet Singh and Mr. P.K. Singh learned Counsel for the respondents.2. The Union of India has preferred the...

Krishan Mohar Singh Dugal Vs. State of Goa

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CriminalNarcotics

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 20 and 50

Reported in : AIR1999SC3842; 2000(1)ALD(Cri)631; 2000CriLJ18; 1999(3)Crimes225(SC); 1999(66)ECC568; JT1999(8)SC115; 1999(6)SCALE415; (1999)8SCC552; 2000(1)LC310(SC)

ORDERNanavati, J.The appellants in these two appeals were tried before the N.D.P.S. Court Mapusa in Special Crime Case No. 42 of 1992 for committing the offence punishable under Section 20(b)(ii) of the N.D.P.S. Act. The trial...

Ramsiya Sharma Vs. Meera Devi

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 13(1)

Reported in : I(1995)DMC614

Advocate for Appellant : Anil Shrivastava, Adv.

A.S. Tripathi, J.1. This appeal is preferred against the judgment and decree dated 8th of Feb., 1993 passed by the 1st Additional District Judge of Bhind, whereby the suit of the plaintiff/appellant for dissolution of marriage...

Ashim K. Roy Vs. Bipinbhai Vadilal Mehta and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Company Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 405, 409, 482 and 561A

Reported in : AIR1997SC3976; 1997(2)ALD(Cri)678; [1998]91CompCas1(SC); JT1997(8)SC392; 1997(6)SCALE374; (1998)1SCC133; [1997]Supp4SCR446

Advocate for Appellant : R.K. Jain,; S. Sanjanwala and Anil Shrivastava, Advs

ORDERK. Venkataswami, J.1. These appeals arise out of a complaint filed by the appellant which was subsequently registered as Criminal Case No. 2627 89. Brief facts leading to the filing of these appeals are given below...

State of Arunachal Pradesh Vs. Damani Construction

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 11(6), 33, 33(1), 34 and 34(3); Limitation Act - Sections 5

Reported in : 2008(1)ALD8(SC); 2007(1)ARBLR399(SC); 2007(3)AWC2266(SC); (2007)2CALLT31(SC); JT2007(4)SC118; 2007(3)SCALE576; (2007)10SCC742; [2007] 3 SCR 416

Advocate for Appellant : Anil Shrivastava, Adv

A.K. Mathur, J.1. Leave granted in both the Special Leave Petitions.2. Since the question of law involved in both the appeals is common, they are disposed of by this common judgment. For the sake of convenience,...

Karmic Bioscience Private Limited Vs.........

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

$~C-17 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:24. 10.2019 + CO.PET. 20/2019 KARMIC BIOSCIENCE PRIVATE LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through Mrs. Isha Khanna, Standing Counsel ........ for OL. versus ........