Advanced Search Results

Parmanand Patel (Dead) by Lr. and anr. Vs. Sudha A. Chowgule and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act - Sections 283(1); Hindu Succession Act, 1956; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 40, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR2009SC1593; JT2009(4)SC504; (2009)5MLJ157(SC); 2009(3)SCALE922; (2009)11SCC127:2009AIRSCW2496:2009(2)LHSC1054:2009(4)KCCRSN197.; (2009) 11 SCC127

Advocate for Appellant : Mukul Rohatgi,; Anil Divan,; G. Ganesh, Sr. Advs.,;

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.C.A. No. 11574 of 2009 @ S.L.P. (C) No. 17162 of 2006 2. Parmanand Patel, since deceased, was a very wealthy person. He floated several companies including the 5th respondent Company herein...

Sudarshan Gochhayat. Vs. State of OrissA.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Property Civil

Acts : Land Acquisition Act - 40(1), 4, 6,12, 3(1)(4), 5-A, 5-A(2), 40(1)(a), 3(1)(iii), 44-B, Chapter 7 ; Companies Act - 252, 3, 12, 13, 21, 22, 23, 25, 27, 29, 568, 570, 573, 617 Read With 2(23), 12(2)(b), 13(2), 27(2); Orissa Industrial Infrastructural Development Corporation Act - 15, 5-A(2); Land Acquisition (Companies) Rule - 4, 3(2), 4 3(1)(3); Government Land Settlement Rules 5, 115.

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.R.K.Rath; M/s. Kousik; M/s. Subir Palit; C.Mishra; A.Mishra;A.K.Mohana.

1. These petitions have been filed by the owners of the land acquired by the State Government in favour of the opposite party Anil Agarwal Foundation (hereinafter in short called as Foundation') for establishment of a...

Jayaram SwaIn and ors.Vs. State of OrissA.

Court : Orissa

Subject : PropertyConstitution

Acts : Land Acquisition Act - Sections 25,7, 12,147, 160(1)(aa), 166(2), 171(1), 177, 93, 209 (4A), 219, 255, 256, 257, 259, 263, 264(1), 285, 292, 299, 301, 3035-A(2); Companies Act - Sections 2, 3, 12, 13,21, 22, 23, 25, 27, 29, 568, 570, 573, 12(2) (b), 13(2), 27(2)617 ;Societies Registration Act - Section ;Orissa Industrial Infrastructural Development Act - Section 43; Universities Act14 ; Right to Information Act (RTI) - Rule 4.

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. R.K.Rath; M/s Kousik A. Guru; A.K.Mohanty; S.K.Mohapatra; M/s. Subir Palit, C.Mishra, A.Mishra; H.K.Ratsingh, Advs.

1. These petitions have been filed by the owners of the land acquired by the State Government in favor of the opposite party Anil Agarwal Foundation (hereinafter in short called as Foundation') for establishment of a...

Fomento Resorts and Hotels Ltd. and anr. Vs. Minguel Martins and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 3, 3(1), 4, 4(1), 5A, 5A(2), 6 to 37, 39, 40, 40(1), 41, 41(5) and 42; Goa, Daman and Diu Town and Country Planning Act, 1974 - Sections 2(10), 4, 8, 8(2), 17, 18, 19, 20, 22, 43(3), 44, 44(1), 44(3), 46, 49(1) and 49(2); Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974; Environment Protection Act, 1986; Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1961 - Sections 40(1); Transfer of Property Act - Sections 52; Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976; Himachal Pradesh Village Common Lands Vesting and Utilization Act, 1973 - Sections 3; Constitution of India - Articles 48A and 51A

Reported in : 2009(57)BLJR711; 2009(4)BomCR348; JT2009(1)SC470; 2009(1)SCALE758; (2009)3SCC571; 2009(1)LC411(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Anil B. Divan,; Indira Jaisingh and; Pallav Shishodia, Sr.

G.S. Singhvi, J.1. The above noted appeals are directed against order dated 25.4.2000 passed by Goa Bench of the High Court of Bombay in Writ Petition No. 330 of 1991 Shri Minguel Martins v. Sociedadee Fomento...

Kunj Behari Lal Butail and ors. Vs. State of H.P. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : H.P. Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1972 - Sections 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 26(1)(2)(3) and 51; Bihar Money Lenders Act, 1938; Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 27; Constitution of India - Article 19(1); Himachal Pradesh Ceiling on Land Holdings Rules, 1973 - Rule 3

Reported in : AIR2000SC1069; JT2000(2)SC307; 2000(1)SCALE691; (2000)3SCC40; [2000]1SCR1054

Advocate for Appellant : Anil B. Diwan,; V.C. Mahajan, Sr. Advs.,; Indra Sawhney,;

R. C. Lahoti, J.1. Leave granted.2. To consolidate and amend the laws relating to ceiling on land holdings in the State of Himachal Pradesh, the Legislative Assembly of Himachal Pradesh enacted Himachal Pradesh Ceiling on Land...

Ferro Alloys Corpn. Ltd. Vs. A.P. State Electricity Board and Another

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ElectricityConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14 and 226; Interest Act, 1978 - Sections 4(2); Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 2(4) and 24; Electricity Rules, 1956 - Rule 27; Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 1975; Orissa State Electricity Board General Conditions of Supply Regulations, 1981 - Regulations 7 and 20; Electricity Act, 1947 - Sections 57(2) and 71

Reported in : AIR1993SC2005; JT1993(3)SC82; 1993(2)SCALE593; 1993Supp(4)SCC136; [1993]3SCR199

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. R.N.Narasimhanmurthy, Mr. Anil B. Divan, Mr. Kailash Vasudev, Mr. G. Ramaswami, Mr. Gobind Mukhoty

ORDERS. Mohan, J.1. Leave granted.2. These civil appeals are directed against the judgment of the Division Bench of Andhra Pradesh High Court reported in Southern Steel Ltd. v. A.P. State Electricity Board, Hyderabad MR 1990 AP...

Smt. Krishnabai C. Kadam and Others Vs. Wellworth Developers and Other ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 16, 29 and 37; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Orders 6, 7 and 39, Rules 1, 2, 7 and 16; Income Tax Act, 1961; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 65

Reported in : AIR2001Bom9; 2000(4)ALLMR200; 2000(4)BomCR757; 2000(4)MhLj532

Advocate for Appellant : Janak Dwarkadas and ;P.K. Samdani, Advs. i/by ;Dhruve Liladhar & Co.

ORDERH.L. Gokhale, J. 1. This Chamber Summons has been taken out by defendant Nos. 1 to 4 in this suit seeking striking out of a part of the plaint and also seeking a direction to the...

Executive Engineer, Dhenkanal Minor Irrigation Division, Orissa, Etc. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 34; Interest Act, 1978; Interest Act, 1839; Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 61(2) and 80; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 3, 29 and 41; Sections 19A; Civil Procedure Act, 1933 - Sections 28, 29, 35A and 97A; Contract Act, 1956 - Sections 73; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 80; Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 61(2)

Reported in : AIR2001SC626; 2001(2)ALLMR(SC)260; (2001)3CALLT1(SC); 91(2001)CLT754(SC); JT2001(1)SC486; (2001)2MLJ128(SC); 2001(1)MPHT526; 2001(1)SCALE109; [2001]1SCR264; (2001) 2 SCC 721

Advocate for Appellant : Gobind Das, Sr. Adv. and; Raj Kumar Mehta, Adv

Pattanaik,J.I have gone through the two judgments of two of my Brother Judges, on the question of the jurisdiction of the Arbitrator to grant interest for the period prior to the reference. While Brother Justice Raju...

Singer India Ltd. Vs. Chander Mohan Chadha and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : TenancyCompany

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act - Sections 14(1); Foreign Exchange Regulation Act 1973 - Sections 28 and 29; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 391 and 394; ;Andhra Pradesh Building (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act - Sections 10; Sections 5 of Esso (Acquisition of Undertakings in India) Act 1974

Reported in : AIR2004SC4368; (2004)4CompLJ413(SC); 113(2004)DLT80(SC); JT2004(8)SC396; (2005)1MLJ184(SC); (2004)138PLR618; 2004(6)SCALE617; (2004)7SCC1

Advocate for Appellant : Anil B. Divan, Sr. Adv. in C.A. No. 387/2004,; Ashok Grover, Sr. Adv. in C.A. No. 388/2004,;

G.P. Mathur, J.1. This appeal, by Special Leave, has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 25.5.2001 of Delhi High Court whereby the Second Appeal preferred by the appellant was dismissed and the judgment and...

Senapathy Whitely Ltd. Vs. Karadi Gowda and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 11A; Constitution of India - Article 136

Reported in : [2000(85)FLR414]; (2000)ILLJ273SC; (1999)9SCC259

ORDER1. Leave granted.2. This is an appeal preferred by the Management of Senapathy Whitely Ltd. against the judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka in Writ Appeal No.3959 of 1997 dated September...